A second discussion with ex-CDC scientist Norman Pieniazek
A second discussion with ex-CDC scientist Norman Pieniazek
Dr Norman Pieniazek is a molecular biologist, geneticist, epidemiologist with 147 publications in virology and parasitology. Before he retired, he spent 24 years working at the Center for Disease Control (CDC) in the USA. He has also spent time abroad including time working in Spain and Poland.
We first interviewed Norman in October 2023 (here) and at the end of that meeting we agree to do a second round of conversation.
We had a list of topics to discuss, including:
Is there any evidence of a “novel” virus?
Virus PCR sequencing
Novelty/materiality of inserts
Phylogenetic trees
Can infections in the lung be affected by mucosal tissue injections?
Immune system compartmentalisation)
Under what conditions does viremia occur?
Same for sepsis
Clones and Variants
Flu shots – do they work?
The video can be viewed here:
The conversation took place on Skype, but unfortunately, we accidentally left the document we were sharing on screen, and this means our faces are compartmentalised within tiny boxes for much of the video. Hence, we recommend you simply listen and treat it like a radio broadcast.
 | A guest post by
|
 | A guest post by
|
A second discussion with ex-CDC scientist Norman Pieniazek
Dr Norman Pieniazek is a wonderful mix of incredible knowledge, common sense and straight talking, he has a razor-sharp mind! This video should be shown in every TV set for the masses to watch and realise how they have been tricked and deceived. I do hope you can do more videos with him, I am going to watch it again and take notes this time, thank you all.
The doctor says (at about 3:30) that they know the sequence of the virus. They do not. They use software to piece together various fragments of DNA into what they decide is the genome of the virus. It's bad science and they know it because they come up with new genomes every time they do it (can you say "variants").
Then they make a PCR "test" that finds a piece of this theoretical virus and we are off to phony pandemic world ...
If you track down the original "Corman-Drosten" paper about how they made PCR for Covid it says very clearly that they had no samples of the virus. So, there was no way for them to validate the "test". https://www.covid19reader.com/did-faulty-science-lead-to-lockdowns-examining-the-drosten-paper/
It boils down to: "We say there is a new virus and the test confirms it." But the test does no such thing, as the Nobel Laureate inventor of PCR made clear. https://www.covid19reader.com/kary-mullis-nobel-laureate-and-science-skeptic/