A short summary of the stages of academic censorship we’ve been subjected to since starting to write papers that challenge the ‘official’ covid narrative.
See also:
The Lancet has become a laughing stock
14 March 2023 Update: Having asked for all internal correspondence about our letter via a subject access information request we got this astonishing response. 17 January 2023 Update: We have now written a full, consolidated report of our experience here
Retrospective censorship: the new punishment for covid dissidents
Delegitimising dissent Those who wish to silence and cancel those who raise concerns about the ‘official covid narrative’ (especially those questioning the ’safe and effective’ vaccines) are resorting to new, more inventive ways, to attack us. Not content to simply ensure that dissenting research papers on covid data never get published, they are now try…
The barriers to academic publication for work that challenges the ‘official narrative’ on Covid-19
Our paper about the “1 in 3 people with Covid-19 have no symptoms” claim has had (at time of writing this) 4093 reads since we posted it on researchgate on Friday, and 336,755 impressions to the tweet about it. The video summaryhas been watched by 7,422 people in 2 days.
Watch with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to Where are the numbers? by Norman Fenton and Martin Neil to watch this video and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.
