Dr Lynn-Fynn-derella has posted a twitter thread announcing that the attempt to defame Dr Paul Marik, and have his 2017 article on the use of Vitamin C in sepsis retracted, has failed.
The case demonstrated the extent to which those determined to protect the flawed ‘official’ covid narrative would go to try to delegitimise any prominent researchers who were challenging that narrative.
Here is the original article we wrote (that was used in the case) explaining why Sheldrick’s claims were wrong:
Excellent news. This double-blind RCT of sepsis for Vitamin C (done completely independently of Dr. Marik) showed that Vitamin C prevented more than 1 in 3 sepsis deaths- and the results would have very likely been better if they had used Dr. Marik's full protocol instead of only Vitamin C alone. Of course, JAMA omitted this statistically significant mortality benefit from mention in the abstract.
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2752063
Of course it is easy to design RCTs to fail and there were plenty of those done, but a very recent meta-analysis of 24 RCTs on Vitamin C for sepsis still shows important mortality benefits, as well as a huge benefit in reducing organ dysfunction. https://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijclp/2023/6733465/
The war on Vitamin C-based protocols for sepsis is eerily similar to the war on ivermectin-based protocols for COVID.
I stand with Paul Marik!!