It is almost as if there was no virus spreading....
Did Prof Michael Levitt discover there was no pandemic?
Nobel laureate in chemistry, Prof Michael Levitt gave a wide-ranging interview on 20th February 2020 where he described his analysis of the data available up to that point from China and the Diamond Princess cruise ship, almost a month before March 11th when a pandemic was declared by the WHO.
A summary transcript (non-verbatim) is very revealing:
Outside Wuhan-Hubei the fatality rate is 0.2% similar to flu
The cases outside Hubei, peaked at the same time than the case inside Hubei, and that's strange, because if you think about that... it's almost like there has been no spreading.
All those workers going home over the Chinese New Year holidays didn't spread it.
Cases outside Wuhan-Hubei were much lower. Why?
We all have coronaviruses and influenza viruses in our nasal passages: you could just have a few virus particles and who knows if that makes you sick.
High rate, 20%, infected on Diamond Princess cruise ship. Yet fatality rate was 2% in Wuhan. Why was there such a big difference? The new DNA PCR testing.
Two people in their 80s died on the Diamond Princess cruise ship, one death on ship of pneumonia. Probably bacterial given the propensity of the elderly to develop secondary post-viral bacterial infections.
Covid doesn't look so terrible. News not reporting actual trends and numbers.
What happened in Wuhan is like a natural disaster not like a viral outbreak.
Anxiety leads to increased susceptibility. Fear makes us physiologically vulnerable to infections.
Cities close to Wuhan-Hubei had death rate more similar to Hong Kong than Wuhan. This makes little sense.
Worst case scenarios are not productive and do not reflect the data.
So far data seems to be either very accurate or fabricated with great cleverness.
Median age of death is over 70. Not comparable to SARS or MERS.
Reports of bioweapon theories are nonsense.
Are we going to find a vaccine? Despite having flu vaccine people die of flu.
In the West many people don't vaccinate, and this is a risk and people should not be allowed to travel by train plane etc and put people at risk.
We all share a responsibility. Strict measures in China and HK probably did contribute to good outcome.
Best preventative measures don’t help much. Masks certainly don't help. Clean hands help.
You should build up natural immunity to make your own vaccine.
What is very revealing about this is that Prof. Levitt clearly does not believe that this event had the attributes and characteristics one would associate with a pandemic. There being no clear evidence of viral spread, and this coupled with large differences in fatality and infection rates, point to the origin event being more similar to a natural disaster than a pandemic. He also thinks talk of bioweapons as nonsense.
Likewise, he correctly identifies the role of PCR testing and bacterial pneumonia in inflating covid infection and fatality rates.
Only when it comes to preventative measures does he become inconsistent, strongly advocating vaccines on the one hand whilst advocating natural immunity on the other.
He was clearly very authoritarian in his call for the freedom of movement of the unvaccinated to be restricted, and for vaccination to be mandatory, presaging future events once the ‘vaccines’ had been launched in late 2020.
Was Prof. Levitt a soothsayer, correctly identifying nearly all of the issues that would undermine the pandemic narrative, and doing so before it was even declared?
For more information on Prof. Levitt’s modelling of the ‘pandemic’ visit the website “The World Hostage: Day 1446” set up by Heather Renkel:
Based on my long and ongoing study of the New York City mass casualty event of spring 2020, I support Dr Levitt’s early observation that there didn’t seem to be any “spread” of a novel coronavirus.
No evidence of any such thing in the Big Apple’s “10 World Trade Center Disasters” death spike.
Plenty of evidence of mass euthanasia, iatrogenic policies, fraud, and the biggest cover-up operation in U.S. history.
I would be happy to meet with Dr Levitt and show him exactly what I mean and why.
He correctly points out the flu vaccines don't work (or prevent flu deaths) ... and then he calls for mass vaccination with a Covid vaccine. That IS inconsistent ... but, otherwise, he makes great points showing that this virus was NOT "lethal." The key point is that this virus HAD to be perceived as unusually deadly to roll-out the lockdowns and then the alleged 'life-saving" vaccines.
The PCR tests were the key to the whole operation .... and then the sudden, inexplicable massive spike in "Covid deaths" in certain big cities like NYC. (One strongly suspects the overwhelming majority of alleged "Covid" deaths weren't caused by Covid but by iatrogenic protocols and unnecessary panic).
Basically, our government probably made a new virus in a lab (but one that wasn't deadly), made and approved the fraudulent PCR tests that massively inflated "cases," and then produced 95 percent of the deaths, which they could attribute to Covid. See what happened? Our trusted officials controlled all the key parts of the Faux Pandemic ... (and they apparently control the mainstream media, their propaganda division).