Where are the numbers? by Norman Fenton and Martin Neil

Where are the numbers? by Norman Fenton and Martin Neil

The bias in vaccine effectiveness studies is finally being noticed

Martin Neil's avatar
Norman Fenton's avatar
Martin Neil and Norman Fenton
Mar 29, 2023
∙ Paid

For over two years (since the start of the covid vaccine roll-out) we have been reporting on the fact that all the observational studies claiming to show vaccine effectiveness suffered from systematic flaws. The most recent summary was here:

Where are the numbers? by Norman Fenton and Martin Neil
How to create the illusion your vaccine is 90% effective
Spoiler: A major study claimed the covid vaccines are over 90% effective. But when you look at the details of the study you find that a whopping 37.2% of all vaccinated participants who were tested within 14 days of the first dose were confirmed as covid cases. None of these ‘cases’ were counted in the efficacy calculation. Also, out of the subset of 1…
Read more
3 years ago · 212 likes · 70 comments · Norman Fenton and Martin Neil

But, for the record, and at the risk of repeating ourselves, examples of our earlier articles which provide detai…

User's avatar

Continue reading this post for free, courtesy of Martin Neil.

Or purchase a paid subscription.
© 2026 Martin Neil and Norman Fenton · Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture