The Lancet heavily redact their response to our subject access request for internal correspondence relating to rejection of our letter about Pfizer study

What have they got to hide?

Norman Fenton

Mar 14, 2023

∙ Paid

266

There has been a remarkable development to the story previously reported here:

Where are the numbers? by Norman Fenton and Martin Neil

The Lancet has become a laughing stock

17 January 2023 Update: We have now written a full, consolidated report of our experience here. In summary: On 6 May 2021 The Lancet published a blatantly flawed study of the effectiveness of the Pfizer covid vaccine on the population of Israel, claiming it was 95% effective…

2 years ago · 627 likes · 239 comments · Martin Neil and Norman Fenton

Following that fiasco, I submitted a subject access information request to Elsevier (who publish The Lancet) asking for all internal correspondence between editors and reviewers relating to the submission (and ultimate rejection) of our letter.

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to Where are the numbers? by Norman Fenton and Martin Neil to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.