The scandal of the EU/Pfizer contract is even worse than reported by the Daily Sceptic
We reported about this in October 2022
Interesting article in the Daily Sceptic today reveals that in April 2021 the Pfizer EU contract contained the statement:
“The Participating Member State further acknowledges that the long-term effect and efficacy of the Vaccine are not curently known and that there may be adverse effects of the Vaccine that are not currently known”.
The article shows that this paragraph (along with other incriminating material) has now been redacted in the version posted by the European Commission. The fact that such clauses were ever in the contract and that the EU is now trying to cover them up is, of course, a very important story.
But, for the record, in October 2022 (after a tip-off from colleagues in Slovenia) we already published this information about the Pfizer contract (our article included a scanned pdf of all versions of the contract). Our colleagues had received the document following an FOI request to the Slovenian Government. Note also that, whereas the Daily Sceptic article refers to the version of the document dated April 2021, the Slovenian document dated 28 Sept 2021 (when so much more was known about the vaccine adverse effects) contains exactly the same wording:
So, it’s great that the excellent Daily Sceptic is reporting on this. But remember: you read it here first over 10 months ago!
Update: This article contains links to many countries’ draft contracts with Pfizer.
The DS asks if people had known that there was a clause in the contract stating that the efficacy and long term safety of the vaccine were still not known, would they have rushed to get jabbed? I think the answer is yes, they would have. Because it was common knowledge in Dec 2020 that the newly developed novel gene-based 'vaccine' could not possibly have been tested for long term safety; it was rushed to market in the space of less than 12 months and efficacy and safety trials were conducted over just a few short months. The mass vaccination campaign WAS the long term safety and efficacy trial. But people still queued up to get jabbed and proudly posted selfies of themselves 'doing the right thing'. By Sept 2021, it was pretty obvious, if not exactly widely publicly known, that the 'vaccine' was useless at preventing transmission, even that it probably enhanced your susceptibility to infection. Anyone could have discovered this information within minutes, but people still queued to get their boosters and eagerly encouraged their kids to get jabbed prior to going back to school or college.
The violation of medical ethics here is too outrageous for words. To administer a vaccine where we can't vouch for it's safety and efficacy is bad enough, but to mandate that people receive such a vaccine just to be able to go about their normal daily activities is beyond the pale.