Why most studies into COVID19 risk factors may be producing flawed conclusions - and how to fix the problem
In a new paper we extend the recent work by Griffith et al which highlights how ‘collider bias’ in studies of COVID19 undermines our understanding of the disease risk and severity. This is typically caused by the data being restricted to people who have undergone COVID19 testing, among whom healthcare workers are over-represented. For example, collider …
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to Where are the numbers? by Norman Fenton and Martin Neil to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.