More on MHRA's refusal to release the data on covid vaccine adverse reactions in pregnant women
And new censorship of this story
Following on from this article, on 12 April I spoke with Debbi Evans and Cheryl Grainger at UK Column about the MHRA's continued refusal to release their data on covid vaccine adverse reactions in the pregnant women they were monitoring in 2021. I also brought up the related issue of UKHSA’s data on adverse outcomes of pregnant women which lumped together women vaccinated prior to - but not during - pregnancy with unvaccinated women; as covered here this means that the two negative pregnancy outcomes suffered by Olympic gold medallist Laura Kenny would have been lumped with the unvaccinated even though she was vaccinated shortly before the first of those pregnancies. Here is the part of the UK Column programme with my interview:
This video is also on rumble.
The full UK Column Programme is here. It is also very interesting to note that YouTube banned the video of this programme on the basis of ‘medical misinformation’ and gave UK Column a strike.
That is exactly what happened to when I posted my video talking about these issues.
This is not new, I am absolutely sure they have playing this same game for as long as vaccines have been developed. Covid turned a spotlight on the corrupted practices of the authorities and with independent people like Professor Fenton scrutinising the numbers we can see their desperate attempts to hide the damage that is being inflicted on populations. Unfortunately they try to isolate his information making it very difficult to share with the wider population.
🇦🇺💉Australian Government: ‘COVID-19 vaccination decision guide for women who are pregnant, breastfeeding or planning pregnancy’, Version 8.8, 12 January 2024: https://www.health.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-01/covid-19-vaccination-shared-decision-making-guide-for-women-who-are-pregnant-breastfeeding-or-planning-pregnancy.pdf
In the section ‘Are COVID-19 vaccines safe in pregnancy’ (page 5), reference is made to an early US study, ‘Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons’ by Shimabukuro TT et al. (ref. 17), which was based on some 35,000 women surveyed over a two and a half month period, from 14 December 2020 to 28 February 2021: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2104983
Other studies in the ‘Further reading’ list of the government’s latest PDF document on this matter appear to be out of date.
I’m disgusted.