The censorship never ends
YouTube removes interviews from Rome conference that were on Italian TV
Yesterday I posted this video with the title “Interview in Rome (mainly in Italian)” on my YouTube channel:
The video description said:
Some of the speakers (myself, Rob Roos, Alberto Donzelli and Wolfgang Wudarg) at the Rome Conference on pandemic management on 20 April were interviewed in this segment of the news on the Byoblu channel.
My write up of the conference is here: https://wherearethenumbers.substack.com/p/20-hours-in-rome-challenging-the
The Byoblu programme is here: https://www.byoblu.com/2024/04/20/tg-byoblu-24-20-aprile-2024-edizione-2000/
Byoblu is an Italian TV news channel.
Within a couple of hours it got removed as ‘medical misinformation’ and I got my second strike within 3 weeks (following this one).
This follows from the Twitter/X censorship that we reported yesterday of my report about the Rome conference.
It’s clear that some of us are still not going to be allowed to disseminate widely any criticism of the WHO or the covid vaccines.
There are many different actors involved with limiting speech. It's not just the social media companies.
Various groups likely have paid workers or consultants (along with some automated tools) whose jobs are to report certain people and certain topics. It's a concerted effort. And, as others have mentioned, how the censorship manifests may be different, depending on one's geographical location.
We know that celebrities, academics, scientists, etc. were paid to push the shots. When Mark Hamill tweets his support of Biden, he is likely doing so for financial gain. Things will continue to get worse this year.
When Musk bought Twitter I joined (my first "social media" account other than watching videos on YT). But, after he hired Linda V. I cancelled my account.
There are so many forces nudging our perceptions and the supposed reality that it is literally mind-boggling...
There is some good news here recently. While the power mad tyrants at the WHO (World Health Organization) still want control over all nations they have dropped section 13A (I'm going from memory so I may have that number wrong) that makes the treaty binding and so now it's non-binding mean nations can opt-out of any recommendations.
That said this also could be as Star Wars Admiral Ackbar said "It's a Trap!". Anyone who pays attention to national level governments knows that one their tactics is the "Foot in the door". This where when they are unable to get what they really want they go for something less that the public will either get on board with or at least won't push back against and later on in secrecy and with little to no press coverage they expand it either by re-defining terms or by claiming it means more then it does. The FBI, CIA, ATF, and the various departments all do it and the only way to stop them is when someone with enough resources can take the Feds to court. Often only state governments have the resources to do this.
The removal of the binding part could be a trick to get the people pushing back against this to back down and go back to sleep. The level of resistance to this WO treaty must be significant because the current set of globalists running this haven’t backed down recently from anything. They’ve been willing to risk self-exposure of their people and assets like the corporate news media; unlike past generations of globalists who when they saw something like this they’d take a few steps back and wait a decade or 2 for the public to go back to sleep. This generation has no problem with showing the public that they will have things their way regardless of what the peasants want. Perhaps their generations in in-breeding has finally created a generation of unintelligent globalists who can still do what they do only b/c of what previous generations built up? In any event be aware of this change to the treaty and don’t let it cause you to back off because they absolutely will try to expand the reach of the treaty if they can get the public onboard with some less scary version of it.