204 Comments
author
Oct 30, 2023·edited Oct 30, 2023Pinned

See long form tweet on the article and re-tweet please.

https://twitter.com/MartinNeil9/status/1718979868937867636

Expand full comment
Oct 30, 2023Liked by Jessica Hockett, Jonathan Engler, Martin Neil

Fraud and malfeasance on stilts! Just goes to show that we, the stubborn, reviled and ostracised refuseniks were right to resist all the blandishments, nudgings, propaganda,'do your bit' and the utterly ridiculous pieces of body armour which rendered much of society into zombies: masks, gloves, vizors, plastic pinnies.

As to Fauci-he could be described as an ELF - an Evil Little F....er.😈

Thanks as always to our excellent authors; carry on exposing

Expand full comment

You link to Fauci et al’s paper published earlier year this year that admits the respiratory jabs are rubbish, how are they still being pressed upon people around the world?!

FYI see my email to them below: https://vaccinationispolitical.files.wordpress.com/2023/04/the-biggest-crime-in-history.the-influenza-and-sars-cov-2-vaccine-scam.pdf

Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 9:45 PM

The biggest crime in history...the influenza and SARS-CoV-2 vaccine scam

For the attention of:

David M. Morens

Jeffery K. Taubenberger

Anthony S. Fauci

David Morens, Jeffery Taubenberger and Anthony Fauci, you admit influenza and SARS-CoV-2 vaccine products are rubbish in your article Rethinking next-generation vaccines for coronaviruses, influenzaviruses, and other respiratory viruses. Cell Host & Microbe 31, 11 January 2023.

You say: "As of 2022, after more than 60 years of experience with influenza vaccines, very little improvement in vaccine prevention of infection has been noted. As pointed out decades ago, and still true today, the rates of effectiveness of our best approved influenza vaccines would be inadequate for licensure for most other vaccine-preventable diseases."

Really?!?!?! So what is this, just out and out fraud?

And now we've been inflicted with the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine racket, products you admit "elicit incomplete and short-lived protection against evolving virus variants that escape population immunity"...but you also say "the rapid development and deployment of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines has saved innumerable lives and helped to achieve early partial pandemic control".

Based upon what evidence do you make that fanciful claim for efficacy?!

How have you gotten away with this utter bullshit for so long?

Because the scientific and medical establishment is captured by the lucrative Church of Vaccination, and incapable of calling out the gross exploitation of mass populations of people with defective and unnecessary products!

How many billions of people, including children, have been misled into having these unnecessary and worse than useless medical interventions?

How many billions of dollars have been squandered on the influenza and SARS-CoV-2 vaccines scam?

And these unnecessary and worse than useless products have been mandated in many instances, mandated medical interventions trashing the legal and ethical obligation for voluntary informed consent. And the medical 'profession' went along with this travesty.

The imposition of these medical interventions, and the resulting medical, economic and social damage, is the biggest crime in history, and it's time for the perpetrators to be brought to account.

Sincerely

Elizabeth Hart

Independent researcher investigating vaccine products and conflicts of interest in vaccination policy

vaccinationispolitical.net

Expand full comment
Oct 30, 2023Liked by Jessica Hockett, Jonathan Engler

Isn't it a miracle that humans managed to arrive to mid 20th century without much intervention from medical bodies and that deaths from childhood illnesses were neglible before any vaccines appeared? This mainly due to stopping kids doing long shifts down mines and factories, up chimneys, living in squalor, bad or no sanitation and poor nutrition, how many kids still live in Africa and other 3rd world areas. Wouldn't it be far more effective if these objectives met?

Expand full comment

"Novavax is a protein subunit vaccine, based on the spike protein, which was available in August 2020 but did not get approval from the FDA. Although it is protein based it will stay in the deltoid muscle injection site. "

Bullshit! No shots stay there. Not even the pre COVID shots.

Whatever other toxic crap is in the shot, it will migrate.

Same with the other vector shots like Astra zeneca, Johnson, and sputnik V.

The numerous choices are false choices and so far nobody has demonstrated that the mRNA even works.

Big clue, even before covid, before "spike protein" , moderna had issues with the lipids during their cancer gene therapy.

Expand full comment
Oct 30, 2023·edited Oct 30, 2023Liked by Jessica Hockett, Martin Neil

Great article. I do not a have a chance right now to watch the full video (will do later) but read the synopsis. It is good to know that there are individuals of the professional calibre and unquestionable expertise of Norman Pieniazek who can talk about everything wrong with the "covid pandemic". What is still a mystery to me is what happened with people like him - and hundreds of thousands of medical doctors and health care professionals who do not have a fraction of Doctor Pieniazek's credentials, but certainly KNEW - who chose to remain "quiet" and allowed this great disgrace to happen. Anyone with basic knowledge about medicine should have known many of the concepts you summarize in your article about respiratory diseases, the absurdity of nasopharingeal PCRs, mRNA "vaccines", NPIs to "control epidemics"... etc.

I can relate to your mention of Doctor Inglesby, who is the author of a seminal article about the futility of "NPIs" in scenarios of epidemics, pointing to the high societal costs related to them - for which they must be avoided. It has always been a mystery to me how this person became an important participant in the infamous "Event 201" and later became an advocate for all the official narrative.

Expand full comment
Oct 30, 2023Liked by Jessica Hockett, Martin Neil

So far I have read only your summary (thank you for it) but clearly this is another tremendous piece of work.

Expand full comment
Oct 30, 2023Liked by Martin Neil

Excellent journalism. Key points:

•”tele-health”/no stethoscope/missed pneumonia

•PCR = “you will find whatever you want to find”

Entrapment of society via medical protocols.

Expand full comment
Oct 30, 2023Liked by Martin Neil

Let's say we accept the premise that they cannot directly edit a virus to become more dangerous. What about serial passage, where the researchers simply allow the most demonstrably virulent strains to keep spreading? No guesswork is needed.

I don't know why this doesn't get mentioned when bioweapons are being discussed since there was work done in ferrets with an avian influenza that led to the GoF ban. Also, iirc sars-cov-2 showed an afinity for mink or some other animal close to ferrets and some farms had to cull them in Europe.

Plus there was an illicit, covert Chinese lab recently discovered in a warehouse filled with ace-2 humanized mice. Could those be used to serial passage sars-cov-2 and were abandoned as the project came to an end?

Expand full comment

"The issue with ‘infectious clones’ is that ‘you do not know what to create’ because there are millions of sequences of coronavirus so there is no ‘clonality’ and each one has 30 thousand nucleotides and there are combinatorically infinite changes you could potentially need to consider when creating a coronavirus5. It therefore isn’t possible to know what to change, via Gain of Function (GoF), to make the virus behave in more dangerous ways."

I think of infectious clones as a family of hypotheses, and one of those is that the clones are just there to create PCR positivity. That's it and that's all.

Another one is that CoV clones of a certain type may have been noted to react with some bacteria (bacteriaphage) in a way that created the "desired" illness.

Expand full comment

The covid gene therapies are not bioweapons? There was no tampering with the virus? DOD not involved with the plandemic? Millions of people found to have cardiac, neuro, pulmonary, circulatory problems post covid vaxx. Excess mortality in young people elevated in all countries that vaxxed. Vertigo, sepsis, heart attacks, blood clots, strokes, turbo cancers, all figments of our imagination? I have to admit, I am confused.

Expand full comment

Restriction on antibiotics a huge cause of deaths in elderly covid pts. Those with hx of COPD, autoimmune disease, other lung illness such as chronic bronchitis were red flags for antibiotic treatment. We did know who should have received antibiotics. Sadly, medical negligence led to the deaths of many elderly.

Expand full comment
Oct 30, 2023Liked by Jessica Hockett, Jonathan Engler

Thank you so much for the written summary.

A small adjustment for ease of future cross reference, the Department of Health and Human Services is HHS.

And although it makes no appearance here, the Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services will be abbreviated CMS, not CMMS. I mention it only because CMS knows exactly how many old people and poor people got the shots, and when they got the shots, and whether they suffered disability or death and when. CMS has the elusive "merged" database for tens of millions of US citizens. Kaiser sits on another merged database for millions. DoD sits on yet another one.

Expand full comment
Oct 31, 2023Liked by Martin Neil

Thank yall so very much for choosing to record this!!!!

I must say the wisdom & knowledge of our older generation is SO IMPORTANT for current generations to learn from!!!!!

Everyone of you are so educated and knowledgeable but the knowledge and wisdom of NORMAN and many like him is what we are missing these days in communications so thank you to all of you and a very huge appreciation of mine goes out to Norman !!!!!

Expand full comment

At time 21:22, Pieniazek said: "The origin of the virus, in the paper that - Fan Wu I think was the name of the first author - these people had of course at the Wuhan institute all fantastic instruments, you know sequencers that they could get from various institutes." However the sequencing was done in Shanghai and most authors of the paper were affiliated with the Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center. Eddie Holmes said that the samples were sent from Wuhan to Shanghai by train (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5u94foNmpKE&t=17m54s).

At time 26:07, Pieniazek described the sequencing of Wuhan-Hu-1 by Wu et al. like this: "You put some kind of a master sequence into the instrument, and then you do sequence it and check what matches the sequence. Because it's very difficult to assemble something from scratch. The pieces are small and there's so many combinations that it's very difficult. So they - as they say - they had all kinds of bat origin viruses. I don't think this kind of work would be permitted in the United States." However actually Wu et al. used MEGAHIT to do de-novo assembly for the metagenomic short reads, and the first 30,474-base version of Wuhan-Hu-1 they published was the contig they got from MEGAHIT (and it accidentally even included 618-base segment of the human genome at the 3' end, which is a common type of assembly error in metagenome-assembled genomes). I posted instructions here on how you can run MEGAHIT yourself to reproduce the de-novo assembly from Wu et al.'s metagenomic reads: https://mongol-fi.github.io/hamburgmath.html. Wu et al. wrote: "Of the 384,096 contigs assembled by Megahit, the longest (30,474 nucleotides (nt)) had a high abundance and was closely related to a bat SARS-like coronavirus (CoV) isolate - bat SL-CoVZC45 (GenBank accession number MG772933) - that had previously been sampled in China, with a nucleotide identity of 89.1% (Supplementary Tables 1, 2)." (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2008-3) But ZC45 wasn't used as any kind of a "master sequence" during the assembly but it was just the closest match for the de-novo assembled contig.

At time 31:30, Engler talked about how Corman-Drosten used samples of SARS1 to test their PCR protocol because they didn't have samples of SARS2 available, and then he said: "Somebody found the sequences - maybe before it was published - somebody, in one of these journals or something - a preprint server - got the sequence from the Chinese before it was published - sent it to him. And then to create plausible deniability about how they came up with it, they made up this story about validating it against SARS and everything." However Corman-Drosten's primes and probes were designed to match both SARS2 and SARS1, so how could their story have been that they didn't know the genome of SARS2 when they designed the protocol? They needed to know what the genome was in order to choose primers which matched it. In Corman-Drosten's paper, they wrote that they designed the protocol based on Wuhan-Hu-1 and a few other early sequences from GISAID.

At time 42:24, Pieniazek said: "My wife actually was on the committee that was naming - created the naming scheme for HIV. And this is such a scam. But you know it from England, from those WhatsApp messages, that let us invent a new variant to scare..." The WhatsApp messages by Matt Hancock were sent on December 13th 2020 UTC. When he asked "When do we deploy the new variant" and he wrote that "We frighten the pants off everyone with the new strain", I believe he was talking about when they would roll out the news story about the Alpha variant (https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/03/04/project-fear-covid-variant-lockdown-matt-hancock-whatsapp/). News stories about the variant were published on December 22nd UTC by The Guardian and BBC, which was 9 days after the WhatsApp messages were posted (https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/dec/22/new-variant-coronavirus-genomic-sars-cov-2-pandemic, https://www.bbc.com/news/health-55413666). The Alpha variant was also known as the "UK variant" or "Kent variant" since it was first found in Kent and it first became widespread in southern England. Alpha was already fairly widespread on December 13th, but it had not yet become a big news story, and the Alpha name wasn't introduced until May 2021. Wikipedia says: "The first case was likely in mid-September 2020 in London or Kent, United Kingdom.[90] The variant was sequenced in September.[91] As of 13 December 2020, 1,108 cases with this variant had been identified in the UK in nearly 60 different local authorities." (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SARS-CoV-2_Alpha_variant#Spread_in_UK) The oldest tweet I found which mentioned the variant identifier B.1.1.7 was posted on December 15th UTC (https://twitter.com/search?q=%22b.1.1.7%22+until%3A2020-12-17&f=live).

---

You wrote: "Before reporting on GenBank they published a preprint identifying the genetic sequences[3], which was appropriated and found its way into the hands of Corman and Drosten, who then decided to exploit it for personal gain (via commercial PCR testing), fabricating a story about validating it against SARS-1."

However the sequence was published first on the Virological.org forum on January 11th UTC and at GenBank on January 12th in an unknown timezone, and the preprint of the paper was only published at bioRxiv on February 2nd in an unknown timezone and as an "accelerated preview" by Nature on February 3rd in an unknown timezone:

- 2020-01-05: The first version of Wuhan-Hu-1 was submitted to GenBank (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MN908947.1).

- 2020-01-07: The Wu et al. paper was received by Nature (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2008-3#article-info).

- 2020-01-11 01:05:33 UTC - Eddie Holmes published the genome of Wuhan-Hu-1 on the virological​.org forum (https://virological.org/t/novel-2019-coronavirus-genome/319). On GISAID there's another early SARS2 sequence called IPBCAMS-WH-01/2019 whose publication date is listed as only 4 minutes earlier (https://twitter.com/Florin_Uncovers/status/1644132093260169216).

- 2020-01-12: The first 30,474 base-version of Wuhan-Hu-1 was published at GenBank (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MN908947.3?report=girevhist). The first version had two assembly errors, because the 3' UTR accidentally included a 598-base segment of human DNA and the 5' UTR accidentally included a 24-base segment from another part of the SARS2 genome.

- 2020-01-13: A preliminary version of Corman-Drosten's paper was published (or at least the preliminary version was dated January 13th) (https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/protocol-v2-1.pdf).

- 2020-01-14: The second 29,875-base version of Wuhan-Hu-1 was published at GenBank (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MN908947.3?report=girevhist). The 598-base piece of human DNA was removed, but the 3' end of the genome was missing the poly(A) tail and 11 bases before the poly(A) tail, and the assembly error in the 5' end was not yet fixed.

- 2020-01-17: The current 29,903 base-version of Wuhan-Hu-1 was published at GenBank (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MN908947.3?report=girevhist). The 5' and 3' UTRs were both fixed, and there's a single nucleotide change in the nucleocapsid gene.

- 2020-01-23: Corman-Drosten's paper was published by EuroSurveillance (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6988269/).

- 2020-01-25: The BioProject for Wu et al.'s raw reads was registerered at the SRA (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/?term=PRJNA603194).

- 2020-01-27: Wu et al.'s raw reads were published at the SRA (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/?term=SRR10971381).

- 2020-02-02: A preprint of the Wu et al. paper was published at bioRxiv (https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.01.24.919183v2).

- 2020-02-03: Wu et al. paper was published as an "accelerated preview" by Nature (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2008-3). Until some time between February 29th and March 3rd, the paper included a note which said: "This is an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. Nature Research are providing this early version of the manuscript as a service to our customers. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting and a proof review before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply." (http://web.archive.org/web/20200203131759/https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2008-3)

(I'm not sure about the timezone of some of these dates.)

Expand full comment
Oct 30, 2023Liked by Jonathan Engler

Having read the summary, and posts blt, the Hallett Inquiry is so far adrift from reality that it might as well be happening on another planet....the planet called Big Pharma on which one approved narrative will hold sway for however long it is drawn out. It is as much of a pretence as the 2 year fear campaign to convince the public they'd keel over if they didn't stay 6' apart, wear a mask and take at least 3 jabs. It's mystifying why more people didn't see the many holes in the claptrap from politicians and medical advisors....Still, hopefully, once bitten twice shy, and with the info provided by WATN and guests there is plenty of 'ammo' to counter clown speak

Expand full comment