In the last three years Paula Jardine has carried out a forensic historical analysis of how and why we got to where we are now with the covid ‘pandemic’ and the drive for universal vaccination. This includes how the World War 2 Manhatten project evolved into Operation Warpspeed to produce the covid mRNA vaccines.
The viral and vaccine world is full of trickery and deceit, I missed this completely prior to 2020. Our public health and politicians have been bought and sold and they act as buffers pretending to be trusted institutions but they have betrayed the very people they should have been representing by continuing the lies and deceitful practices of their owners. All of our institutions have been corrupted and are rotting from the inside.
This was a hugely informative interview-Paula's work has been very informative. One small correction-I believe it's important to reiterate that the licensing authority in the UK for the mRNA (and now we know Plasmid DNA!) products is not the MHRA but the Secretary of State for Health, and in N. Ireland, the Minister for Health. In the UK, this function seems to have been delegated by Matt Hancock to the Parliamentary Undersecretary of State for Technology, Innovation and Health Sciences, Lord Bethall, and in NI the EUA authorisations were signed by Robin Swann, an Ulster Unionist MLA and openly proud Freemason. The Pfizer/BioNTech BNT162b2vaccine only ever had emergency use authorisation under regulation 174 of the Human Medicines Regulations 2012-that is it was an UNLICENSED product. 40 million doses were purchased by the UK government, and it seems most were injected including to children and pregnant women. Likewise in Europe, the Licensing Authority was not, as was generally reported, the European Medicines Agency, but the European Commission. In April 20212, the GMC wrote to all doctors in a document called "Good Practice in Prescribing Medicines and Devices", which falsely stated that the MHRA and not the Minister was the licencing authority. The GMC said in paragraph 105-"....Prescribing unlicensed medicines may be necessary in the following instances...there is a serious risk to public health and the MHRA has temporarily authorised the sale or supply of an unlicensed medicine such as a vaccine...". This was false representation on the part of the GMC, the body who has suspended doctors, (and yes, I have a conflict of interest to declare here!) for pointing some of these unsavoury truths.
What do you think of the Nuremberg hearing scheduled for November 9 in Costa Rica. The case is Interest of Justice vs Caja Costarricense Seguro Social. Dr. Michael Yeadon is the chief scientist for Interest of Justice. The group is underfunded. Experts can testify by video. Please check out Interest of Justice Substack and website.
Excellent work, always concerned, but I am seeing clearer now.
The WHO new Health ( Power Grab) Regulations 2024 are not mentioned but fit in. WHO is significantly funded by US, who as the video says has the long term bio-Manhattan project. So the UK Govt knows it place and will quietly acquiesce and we will get over vaccinated as we are over medicated, for the benefit of other people's profit.
Time for exercising Informed Consent when pushed to be vaccinated, bearing in mind that the information available is likely to be strongly biased.
Oct 15, 2023·edited Oct 15, 2023Liked by Martin Neil
THANK YOU to both of you for this truly outstanding contribution towards understanding what has befallen us. With my gratitude, and for those who don't do video, a first excerpt transcribed:
Anatomy of the sinister Covid project: Norman Fenton interviews Paula Jardine
(Revealing the historical context of covid and the mass vaccine drive)
Paula Jardin "is a writer/researcher who has just completed the graduate diploma in law at ULaw. She has a history degree from the University of Toronto and a journalism degree from the University of King’s College in Halifax, Nova Scotia."-- Source:https://brownstone.org/articles/manhattan-project-biomedical-security-state-part-1/
[music]
0:09
NORMAN FENTON: So yeah, welcome everybody. It's the 12th of October 2023 and I'm absolutely delighted to have Paula Jardine with me today because Paula has done some of the most remarkable research on the origins, in particular the historical perspective and the ongoing covid project, many of the complicated and troubling issues surrounding that and the vaccine program.
And although you did a six-part series really covering this in the Conservative Woman website* I don't think that enough people are aware of your work. It merits far more people to be aware of it, and hopefully today I can give you the opportunity to explain, hopefully in relatively lay terms, to more people, what was really behind this and in particular that historical perspective.
But before we get on to that, if you can just give it a brief introduction as to your background and why you came to be looking at this material.
PAULA JARDINE: Yeah, so I go right back to the beginning. I have a history degree, studied history at the University of Toronto, and I specialized in imperial history, and nationalist reaction movements was my area of interest. But I hadn't really done anything as a historian. I trained as a journalist afterwards. Hadn't worked as a journalist or done anything historical until all the covid stuff happened. And then I sort of found myself in a position where I knew something was wrong, and I started just researching for my own interest first, and I was getting a bit frustrated that some of what I knew was happening wasn't in the public domain. And I was frustrated, and then it just occurred to me one day, well, you're a trained journalist, do something about it!
And I, I just happened to have a combination of the research skills and, and the writing skills and a, a background that equipped me to understand things from a slightly different perspective. And it moved things away from a lot of the scientific debate, which I sort of felt was becoming very bogged down because you had two very entrenched sides and, and it was quite technical arguments. And it was difficult to to cut across for a lot of ordinary people. So that was kind of my starting point, was like, how do I find some ground here that opens people's eyes up to, to some of what was going on. So that's where it started.
NORMAN FENTON: OK, so tell me about the Manhattan Project.** I mean people, most people I guess will be aware that the Manhattan Project was the World War II nuclear development project. So explain what it's got to do, what has any of that got to do now with covid and the vaccine program?
3:19
PAULA JARDINE: Well, what I discovered is that since about 2005, in the aftermath of 9-11, there's been a small group of people from the biodefense community who have had aspirations for what they termed and, and were calling openly from about 2005, a Manhattan Project for biodefense. And the Bush Administration had a very aggressive doctrine that they introduced in about 2004, which technically speaking violates the 1975 Convention on Biological Weapons. And they had this idea that you needed to defend against bioterrorism by doing your own bioweapons research and then developing countermeasures, so vaccines and therapeutics, to defend against this hypothetical threat. And it was part of what the Bush Administration defense doctrine called Full Spectrum Dominance.
So thus we have things like this project to go out and find viruses anywhere that the US military might want to be planning for future operations. Just as a preventative measure. You know, some of it is, is quite right out of the the science fiction pages of something like Dr. Strangelove.*** When you look at it and you, it just doesn't make any sense at all. You, you're talking about throwing billions of dollars at research for products that don't have a natural market and therefore there's no need for them. But there is this aspiration to have them inside American government. And it's been enshrined in their policy via a series of presidential directives.
5:14
So back in 2015, what I uncovered in the research, was that this idea of a Manhattan Project had been kicked off again. So if you remember the, it was 2014 when the Obama Administration imposed a moratorium on the gain of function research, and all of a sudden in 2015 they're talking about this Manhattan Project again and wanting to have prototype vaccines for 28 different classes of known biological pathogens and rapid response vaccine platforms like the mRNA and DNA vaccines that could be tweaked and rolled out within a matter of weeks on the general public.
In 2015 there's a man named Dr. Robert Kadlec who is really the the principal architect of US 21st century biodefense policy. And he was the Director of Biosecurity Policy for the Homeland Security Department in the Bush Administration from just shortly after 9-11 I think he immediately was called in. He'd been a bioweapons inspector in Iraq in the 1990s, he was a US Air Force surgeon. And a lot of this policy that we're seeing now has its origin is policy that he developed back then. But by 2011 he'd gone to work as—
NORMAN FENTON: Just, just to clarify that. Do you think that there was a genuine concern arising out of the fear of somebody like Saddam Hussein to actually use bioweapons against the US? Was that the motivating factor, or, or was it something else?
Big Pharma might, once again, become credible if and when they accept LIABILITY for all injuries and DEATHS that occur following the use of their depopulating medicines and injected poisons!
The jab, at best, could come from a spoiled batch, or a placebo, (if such a thing ever really existed since Covid was created and deliberately released) they might have dodged the bullet.
The more likely scenario is that every person that received any/all of the pretend 'VACCINES' will now endure permanent 'Genetically Modified' inherent problems, a shorter life expectancy, the return of previously historical illnesses, turbo cancers, and a general vulnerability to all future virus born illnesses and diseases.
The poisonous injection is meant to do all of the above, is PERMANENT and hereditary!
That's what is being proven with every day that this NO LIABILITY injection is allowed to be peddled by those that mean us harm!
At 53:00 Norman asks “What should we be on the lookout for?” but I can’t make out Paula’s reply, something like “arepa” virus. I’ve seen John Campbell expose fearmongering about a Pirola virus but that doesn’t seem to fit. Transcript?
A fascinating interview. Covid seemed to ramp up once the vaccine campaigns began, so my guess would be the vaccines as the main source of the illness. Prior to that perhaps they put something into the ventilation system of the New York subway, perhaps flu vaccines in 2020 had an ingredient.
James Giordano talking to the army recruits suggests something like this, as does Karen Kingston, and Jessica Hockett talking to Jonathan Couey.
The viral and vaccine world is full of trickery and deceit, I missed this completely prior to 2020. Our public health and politicians have been bought and sold and they act as buffers pretending to be trusted institutions but they have betrayed the very people they should have been representing by continuing the lies and deceitful practices of their owners. All of our institutions have been corrupted and are rotting from the inside.
Phenomenal show incredible research gems.. kudos & thanks! <3
This was a hugely informative interview-Paula's work has been very informative. One small correction-I believe it's important to reiterate that the licensing authority in the UK for the mRNA (and now we know Plasmid DNA!) products is not the MHRA but the Secretary of State for Health, and in N. Ireland, the Minister for Health. In the UK, this function seems to have been delegated by Matt Hancock to the Parliamentary Undersecretary of State for Technology, Innovation and Health Sciences, Lord Bethall, and in NI the EUA authorisations were signed by Robin Swann, an Ulster Unionist MLA and openly proud Freemason. The Pfizer/BioNTech BNT162b2vaccine only ever had emergency use authorisation under regulation 174 of the Human Medicines Regulations 2012-that is it was an UNLICENSED product. 40 million doses were purchased by the UK government, and it seems most were injected including to children and pregnant women. Likewise in Europe, the Licensing Authority was not, as was generally reported, the European Medicines Agency, but the European Commission. In April 20212, the GMC wrote to all doctors in a document called "Good Practice in Prescribing Medicines and Devices", which falsely stated that the MHRA and not the Minister was the licencing authority. The GMC said in paragraph 105-"....Prescribing unlicensed medicines may be necessary in the following instances...there is a serious risk to public health and the MHRA has temporarily authorised the sale or supply of an unlicensed medicine such as a vaccine...". This was false representation on the part of the GMC, the body who has suspended doctors, (and yes, I have a conflict of interest to declare here!) for pointing some of these unsavoury truths.
What do you think of the Nuremberg hearing scheduled for November 9 in Costa Rica. The case is Interest of Justice vs Caja Costarricense Seguro Social. Dr. Michael Yeadon is the chief scientist for Interest of Justice. The group is underfunded. Experts can testify by video. Please check out Interest of Justice Substack and website.
You are the best of humankind.. Thank you for all your hard work.
Marvelous work of incredible value. It needs an urgent tight synopsis and widespread publication.
Excellent, such a memory and attention to detail! Thank goodness for researchers like this lady... amazing work 👏
Excellent work, always concerned, but I am seeing clearer now.
The WHO new Health ( Power Grab) Regulations 2024 are not mentioned but fit in. WHO is significantly funded by US, who as the video says has the long term bio-Manhattan project. So the UK Govt knows it place and will quietly acquiesce and we will get over vaccinated as we are over medicated, for the benefit of other people's profit.
Time for exercising Informed Consent when pushed to be vaccinated, bearing in mind that the information available is likely to be strongly biased.
Glad others see this as clearly as I do.
THANK YOU to both of you for this truly outstanding contribution towards understanding what has befallen us. With my gratitude, and for those who don't do video, a first excerpt transcribed:
Anatomy of the sinister Covid project: Norman Fenton interviews Paula Jardine
(Revealing the historical context of covid and the mass vaccine drive)
Norman Fenton, posted October 12, 2023
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EDpgDqh1_X8
See also: https://wherearethenumbers.substack.com/p/anatomy-of-the-sinister-covid-project
TRANSCRIPT - BRIEF EXCERPT
TRANSCRIBER'S NOTES:
Norman Fenton is Professor Emeritus of Risk, Queen Mary University of London. His webpage is https://www.normanfenton.com and his Substack is https://wherearethenumbers.substack.com/
Paula Jardin "is a writer/researcher who has just completed the graduate diploma in law at ULaw. She has a history degree from the University of Toronto and a journalism degree from the University of King’s College in Halifax, Nova Scotia."-- Source:https://brownstone.org/articles/manhattan-project-biomedical-security-state-part-1/
[music]
0:09
NORMAN FENTON: So yeah, welcome everybody. It's the 12th of October 2023 and I'm absolutely delighted to have Paula Jardine with me today because Paula has done some of the most remarkable research on the origins, in particular the historical perspective and the ongoing covid project, many of the complicated and troubling issues surrounding that and the vaccine program.
And although you did a six-part series really covering this in the Conservative Woman website* I don't think that enough people are aware of your work. It merits far more people to be aware of it, and hopefully today I can give you the opportunity to explain, hopefully in relatively lay terms, to more people, what was really behind this and in particular that historical perspective.
But before we get on to that, if you can just give it a brief introduction as to your background and why you came to be looking at this material.
PAULA JARDINE: Yeah, so I go right back to the beginning. I have a history degree, studied history at the University of Toronto, and I specialized in imperial history, and nationalist reaction movements was my area of interest. But I hadn't really done anything as a historian. I trained as a journalist afterwards. Hadn't worked as a journalist or done anything historical until all the covid stuff happened. And then I sort of found myself in a position where I knew something was wrong, and I started just researching for my own interest first, and I was getting a bit frustrated that some of what I knew was happening wasn't in the public domain. And I was frustrated, and then it just occurred to me one day, well, you're a trained journalist, do something about it!
And I, I just happened to have a combination of the research skills and, and the writing skills and a, a background that equipped me to understand things from a slightly different perspective. And it moved things away from a lot of the scientific debate, which I sort of felt was becoming very bogged down because you had two very entrenched sides and, and it was quite technical arguments. And it was difficult to to cut across for a lot of ordinary people. So that was kind of my starting point, was like, how do I find some ground here that opens people's eyes up to, to some of what was going on. So that's where it started.
NORMAN FENTON: OK, so tell me about the Manhattan Project.** I mean people, most people I guess will be aware that the Manhattan Project was the World War II nuclear development project. So explain what it's got to do, what has any of that got to do now with covid and the vaccine program?
3:19
PAULA JARDINE: Well, what I discovered is that since about 2005, in the aftermath of 9-11, there's been a small group of people from the biodefense community who have had aspirations for what they termed and, and were calling openly from about 2005, a Manhattan Project for biodefense. And the Bush Administration had a very aggressive doctrine that they introduced in about 2004, which technically speaking violates the 1975 Convention on Biological Weapons. And they had this idea that you needed to defend against bioterrorism by doing your own bioweapons research and then developing countermeasures, so vaccines and therapeutics, to defend against this hypothetical threat. And it was part of what the Bush Administration defense doctrine called Full Spectrum Dominance.
So thus we have things like this project to go out and find viruses anywhere that the US military might want to be planning for future operations. Just as a preventative measure. You know, some of it is, is quite right out of the the science fiction pages of something like Dr. Strangelove.*** When you look at it and you, it just doesn't make any sense at all. You, you're talking about throwing billions of dollars at research for products that don't have a natural market and therefore there's no need for them. But there is this aspiration to have them inside American government. And it's been enshrined in their policy via a series of presidential directives.
5:14
So back in 2015, what I uncovered in the research, was that this idea of a Manhattan Project had been kicked off again. So if you remember the, it was 2014 when the Obama Administration imposed a moratorium on the gain of function research, and all of a sudden in 2015 they're talking about this Manhattan Project again and wanting to have prototype vaccines for 28 different classes of known biological pathogens and rapid response vaccine platforms like the mRNA and DNA vaccines that could be tweaked and rolled out within a matter of weeks on the general public.
In 2015 there's a man named Dr. Robert Kadlec who is really the the principal architect of US 21st century biodefense policy. And he was the Director of Biosecurity Policy for the Homeland Security Department in the Bush Administration from just shortly after 9-11 I think he immediately was called in. He'd been a bioweapons inspector in Iraq in the 1990s, he was a US Air Force surgeon. And a lot of this policy that we're seeing now has its origin is policy that he developed back then. But by 2011 he'd gone to work as—
NORMAN FENTON: Just, just to clarify that. Do you think that there was a genuine concern arising out of the fear of somebody like Saddam Hussein to actually use bioweapons against the US? Was that the motivating factor, or, or was it something else?
...continued...
Big Pharma might, once again, become credible if and when they accept LIABILITY for all injuries and DEATHS that occur following the use of their depopulating medicines and injected poisons!
The jab, at best, could come from a spoiled batch, or a placebo, (if such a thing ever really existed since Covid was created and deliberately released) they might have dodged the bullet.
The more likely scenario is that every person that received any/all of the pretend 'VACCINES' will now endure permanent 'Genetically Modified' inherent problems, a shorter life expectancy, the return of previously historical illnesses, turbo cancers, and a general vulnerability to all future virus born illnesses and diseases.
The poisonous injection is meant to do all of the above, is PERMANENT and hereditary!
That's what is being proven with every day that this NO LIABILITY injection is allowed to be peddled by those that mean us harm!
Mick from Hooe (UK) Unjabbed to live longer!
At 53:00 Norman asks “What should we be on the lookout for?” but I can’t make out Paula’s reply, something like “arepa” virus. I’ve seen John Campbell expose fearmongering about a Pirola virus but that doesn’t seem to fit. Transcript?
A fascinating interview. Covid seemed to ramp up once the vaccine campaigns began, so my guess would be the vaccines as the main source of the illness. Prior to that perhaps they put something into the ventilation system of the New York subway, perhaps flu vaccines in 2020 had an ingredient.
James Giordano talking to the army recruits suggests something like this, as does Karen Kingston, and Jessica Hockett talking to Jonathan Couey.
8 MEPs writes to the EMA - EUAs given illegally, the covid chemical concoctions must be removed from use:
https://marceldegraaff.nl/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Letter-suspension-marketing-authorizations-_231005_093400.pdf
Therefore, it is imperative that immediate action is taken to suspend the following marketing authorizations:
- Conditional Marketing Authorisation Pfizer (Comirnaty) dated 21 December 2020.
- Conditional Marketing Authorisation Moderna (Spikevax) dated 6 January 2021
- Renewal of Marketing Authorisation Pfizer (Comirnaty-tozinameran) dated 31 August 2023
- Renewal Marketing Authorisation Moderna (Spikevax-elasomeran) dated 15 September 2023
We kindly request an acknowledgment of receipt and anticipate a comprehensive response to this request at your earliest convenience.
Sincerely,
Marcel de Graaff (Member of the European Parliament)
Gilbert Collard (Member of the European Parliament)
Francesca Donato (Member of the European Parliament)
Joachim Kuhs (Member of the European Parliament)
Mislav Kolakušić (Member of the European Parliament)
Virginie Joron (Member of the European Parliament)
Ivan Vilibor Sinčić (Member of the European Parliament)
Bernhard Zimniok (Member of the European Parliament)