

Discover more from Where are the numbers? by Norman Fenton and Martin Neil
See 31 July 2023 update to this story.
A few weeks ago I was invited to present our work on Bayesian networks for the NHS Health and Care Analytics Conference 2023. This is a large and important conference chaired by Ben Goldacre (the author of the best seller 'Bad Science') - sold out with over 400 delegates and a similar number online.
The conference organisers tweeted about my presentation (screen shot below in case the tweet is deleted):
I was neither offered, nor asked for, any fee for doing this. In the last week I spent many hours preparing a presentation to ensure it properly addressed the conference theme and contained our latest research with examples of Bayesian network risk models for a range of chronic diseases (diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis and Alzheimers). The title, abstract and bio that were agreed and approved are provided at the bottom of this article. The talk was nothing to do with any work I have undertaken on covid or the vaccines.
On Tuesday (20 June 2023) - ironically just seconds after recording a video for Michael Shellenberg’s Censorship Files documentary - I received the following email from the person who had originally invited me to make the presentation. I have redacted the name of that person and the other recipients.
So, I was cancelled not for the content of my talk but because I had done other work raising concerns about covid vaccine safety.
After an immediate response that I sent on 20 June stating that I intended to make this public (for which there was no response), I sent the following more formal follow-up at 09.00 on 21 June :
Following on from my response yesterday, I would like to know more about how the decision was made to cancel my presentation and who initiated it and approved it (including if any of the recipients of the email approved the decision). Was there any attempt by any NHS staff to reverse the decision given that it is clear that my voice has been suppressed simply for raising safety concerns in the public interest? I am asking this because it has become a matter of public interest to publish this story of censorship. I would be grateful if you could reply within 24 hours as I intend to publish this tomorrow.
I also require a copy of all the communications referred to ("the conference committee have just been alerted to") by return under GDPR.
More than 24 hours have passed and I’ve still received no acknowledgement or reply.
Of course this is just the latest - albeit a particularly nasty - example of the censorship and cancellation I’ve suffered for the last three years.
As Martin noted on twitter:
Note that in censoring Norman they are also censoring research undertaken by young researchers who have not uttered a public word on the subject of vaccines. Also bear in mind the results of this research were largely funded by the public purse, hence the event committee are denying the NHS access to research results funded by another arm of government. The decision is not only unethical and irrational, it is deliberately vindictive.
Some relevant information on Ben Goldacre here and here.
Here is the title, abstract and bio that were agreed:
Title: Bayesian networks: what are they and why they work when ‘big data’ methods fail
Abstract
Misunderstandings about risk, statistics and probability often lead to flawed decision-making in many critical areas such as medicine, finance, law, defence, and transport. The ‘big data’ revolution was intended to at least partly address these concerns by removing reliance on subjective judgments. However, even where (relevant) big data are available there are fundamental limitations to what can be achieved through pure machine learning techniques. This talk will explain the successes and challenges in using causal probabilistic models of risk – based on a technique called Bayesian networks – in providing powerful decision-support and accurate predictions by combining minimal data with expert judgment. The talk will provide examples in chronic diseases.
The talk is targeted at anybody interested in quantifying and predicting risk.
Bio
Norman is Professor Emeritus of Risk at Queen Mary University of London (retired as Full Professor Dec 2022) and a Director of Agena, a company that specialises in artificial intelligence and Bayesian probabilistic reasoning. A mathematician by training with current focus on quantifying risk and uncertainty using causal, probabilistic models that combine data and knowledge (Bayesian networks). He has published 7 books and over 350 peer reviewed articles. His works covers multiple application domains including especially health and law/forensics (he has been an expert witness in major criminal and civil cases). Since 2020 he has been active in analysing data related to Covid risk.
Here’s a video I’ve done of this story:
Blasphemers begone
We have to face the fact that most people are devoted to Authority in all its guises. No amount of factual information will disturb this obsession. You can lead the Hordes to Data but you cannot make them Think.
Sort of reads like one of those babylon bee jokes.
Scientific expert on applying reasoning cancelled from conference for coming to different conclusion to the government...