Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Tareq I. Albaho, PhD's avatar

While the numbers appear to speak for themselves, they generate further questions:

- How was a covid diagnosis established? I presume by PCR? How many cycles? There is another factor to take into account.

- What treatment did patients with covid diagnosis receive? Were they put on ventilators and refused anything else?

Although as it stands the data is damning enough, it can only get worse if the above factors have not been considered?

Expand full comment
Robert Dyson's avatar

The challenge is to find the data that does not support the thesis in the book. I have read articles by Steve Kirsch for some years where he begs people to show he's wrong, even offering a cash incentive of $ millions.

Anyway, “Always get your vaccine and health information from trusted sources, such as the NHS or World Health Organisation (WHO)”. https://www.nhs.uk/vaccinations/why-vaccination-is-important-and-the-safest-way-to-protect-yourself/

So, NHS & WHO, get yourself a cash boost from Steve Kirsch – and shut down Fenton & Neil et al.

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?