Yes, there are real doubts about the climate change agenda. The pandemic taught us just how manipulated science communication can be and has caused me (and many others I suppose) to start to question whether we may have been manipulated/misled on other science-related issues. However, in my opinion, the best explanation for the elites pushing the "we must do something about climate change" line is the awareness of the inevitability of fossil fuel availability decline and the desire to suppress awareness of this in the broader community while maintaining control and even attempting to move towards ameliorative measures. We are past the peak rate of global coal production, at or past the peak rate of oil production, and near the peak rate of natural gas production. This means that we are actually already in a state of net energy decline globally (i.e. the energy that is left over to run the economy after the energy required to procure the energy is subtracted). This fact - about which we can do nothing - is in direct opposition to the idea of eternal economic growth and human "progress" so markets want nothing to do with it. We saw them suppressing this information many years ago:
and they are still doing it. It used to be that, every time the oil price went up, people started talking about the idea of "peak oil" (which actually means the peak RATE of oil production, it does not mean that oil is about to disappear tomorrow). But, now that we are actually at/past the peak rate, the topic is verboten in the mainstream media and strongly opposed when raised in alternative media forums. That, in itself, tells us a lot.
One M.Sc. study out of Uppsala estimated that an entire third of all fossil fuel energy globally goes to production, distribution, and preparation of food. Declining fossil fuel production threatens food production for the world's billions - an idea too terrifying for most people to accept - i.e. causes cognitive dissonance.
If i understand it correctly, the outcome is LOWER odds for certain neonatal damage after vaccination during pregnancy, which completely baffles me. I miss the capacities to check for any possible flaws in this study, but maybe you are willing to shine your light on it? Thanks in advance!
To watch this video, i am required to create an account on ADH TV and i do not feel like doing that. Would be nice if the video would be also uploaded on Rumble!
I loved your opinions.
I would like to watch this but I don't want to download an app to do it.
Can you post the transcript?
Yes, there are real doubts about the climate change agenda. The pandemic taught us just how manipulated science communication can be and has caused me (and many others I suppose) to start to question whether we may have been manipulated/misled on other science-related issues. However, in my opinion, the best explanation for the elites pushing the "we must do something about climate change" line is the awareness of the inevitability of fossil fuel availability decline and the desire to suppress awareness of this in the broader community while maintaining control and even attempting to move towards ameliorative measures. We are past the peak rate of global coal production, at or past the peak rate of oil production, and near the peak rate of natural gas production. This means that we are actually already in a state of net energy decline globally (i.e. the energy that is left over to run the economy after the energy required to procure the energy is subtracted). This fact - about which we can do nothing - is in direct opposition to the idea of eternal economic growth and human "progress" so markets want nothing to do with it. We saw them suppressing this information many years ago:
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2009/nov/09/peak-oil-international-energy-agency
and they are still doing it. It used to be that, every time the oil price went up, people started talking about the idea of "peak oil" (which actually means the peak RATE of oil production, it does not mean that oil is about to disappear tomorrow). But, now that we are actually at/past the peak rate, the topic is verboten in the mainstream media and strongly opposed when raised in alternative media forums. That, in itself, tells us a lot.
One M.Sc. study out of Uppsala estimated that an entire third of all fossil fuel energy globally goes to production, distribution, and preparation of food. Declining fossil fuel production threatens food production for the world's billions - an idea too terrifying for most people to accept - i.e. causes cognitive dissonance.
Norman, would this be something for you to chew through? https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2814537 (Neonatal Outcomes After COVID-19 Vaccination in Pregnancy, published February 6th, 2024).
If i understand it correctly, the outcome is LOWER odds for certain neonatal damage after vaccination during pregnancy, which completely baffles me. I miss the capacities to check for any possible flaws in this study, but maybe you are willing to shine your light on it? Thanks in advance!
When I try to link to it, there is a black error page. Is it being blocked?
To watch this video, i am required to create an account on ADH TV and i do not feel like doing that. Would be nice if the video would be also uploaded on Rumble!