Fact check: "The covid vaccine is safe for pregnant women"
There's been a lot of genuine misinformation and confusion - from both sides of the argument - about the extent of safety concerns of the covid vaccine in pregnancy. While anybody with any level of capacity for rational thought knows by now that there is (and never was) any need for women to get vaccinated before or during pregnancy, many still assume that the vaccine likely does no harm to them. This important article not only clears up a lot of the misinformation and confusion, but also shows that there was enough information from Pfizer in June 2021 for regulators to know it should have stopped allowing the vaccine to be given to pregnant women then:
This twitter thread on NHS data also reveals alarming safety signals:
Those who continue to push hard for vaccinating pregnant women claim that, irrespective of any safety signals that might have been present in the Pfizer trial data, there have been multiple large-scale observational studies since that demonstrate safety. However, these studies are generally flawed in one way or another. For example, in March 2022 we identified a fundamental problem with the UKHSA data that was suggesting no safety concern - in this a bias was introduced from the fact that women vaccinated prior to pregnancy were included in "no doses in pregnancy". Here is a short video we produced at the time explaining the bias:
But there is an even more fundamental bias that confounds all the published observational studies claiming the vaccine is safe (or in some cases even beneficial) in pregnancy. The problem is that the vaccinated women in those studies primarily had their vaccines in later stages of pregnancy when they had already passed the most dangerous (first trimester) period for miscarriages. In other words, these studies are subject to survivor bias. A very simple graphical explanation of this bias is demonstrated here:
This video by Retsef Levi provides a very thorough explanation of the problem explaining why these so-called reassuring studies are anything but.
And never forget the curious case of the spike in neonatal deaths in Scotland in 2021-22. The ‘experts’ ruled out any possible link to the vaccination programme …but did so “without checking” the vaccination status of the mothers who lost their babies:
Judging by the PHS statement it seems more likely they did check (it would be incomprehensibe if they did not) and refused to reveal that information as it “had the potential to be used to harm vaccine confidence at this critical time”:
Verdict: The covid vaccines were approved without any safety data on pregnant women and as soon as such data were available to Pfizer they knew it was not safe. The many observational studies claiming safety simply reveal the embarrasing incompetence (and/or conflict of interests) of their authors.
Update from Arkmedic:
I thank Norman for pulling this together.
Obviously, his is the correct verdict.
But there’s a point almost everyone has missed.
For 60 years, since thalidomide, we have NEVER administered experimental medical treatments to pregnant women.
It’s pretty much THE reddest of red lines.
I knew this from my R&D experience.
I bet all midwives & doctors knew this, too.
I expect the majority of nurses did, too.
The general public knows it.
Recall in saner days asking whether a paracetamol tablet was safe in pregnancy?
And the caution about unpasteurised milk?
Avoiding alcohol and cigarette smoking?
But it’s fine to inject pregnant women with a new technology gene based material with no prior clinical experience?
Right-O.
Here’s something you won’t want to read but I’m afraid you need to know it, in order to be steeled for whatever is coming next.
These injections were DESIGNED to injure, maim & kill. There’s no possibility that my clever peers in the vaccines division didn’t know these three utterly incontestable facts.
1. Choice of spike protein as immunogen. Spike is the only part of the family of coronaviruses known to be acutely toxic to mammals. They’re biologically active, prompting blood coagulation and activating immune complement, among other nasty effects. Spike also contains many short sequences which bear sufficient similarities to human proteins that it was likely that it would cause autoimmune reactions.
All four leading companies chose spike. I believe that’s collusion & not coincidence.
2. Choice of lipid nanoparticles (LNP) formulations to wrap these mRNA sequences in. This not only prompts the injected material to distribute stealthily around the body (when it’s needed only in the lymph nodes). Worse still, there are published peer reviewed journal articles showing that formulations of this type accumulate in organs including the ovaries. This was actually confirmed in the case of the Pfizer product.
3. Worst of all, the use of gene-based technology at all. When the cells in your body take up & transcribe the mRNA into proteins, those cells mark themselves as displaying NON-SELF products. Your immune system knows that means infection or an aberration like cancer. That immune system launches attacks upon that cell with the intention of killing it. Those autoimmune reactions vary in intensity and effectiveness. This is certain to happen with all such mRNA “vaccines”.
You may have heard that your government has agreed to buy sufficient new “vaccines” to be able to inject you a further ten (10) times. Guess what they’re going to do those doses?
The initial “covid19 vaccines” products itself were horribly variable because they didn’t bother to manufacture them properly. All a bit of a rush, of course.
The next wave “vaccines” won’t be any better, thankfully. Had they been consistently made, far more injuries and deaths would already have occurred.
If anyone in industry would like to contest that they didn’t know these things between the idea and injecting 6 billion people, do let me know. I don’t expect any replies from that direction.