It is Sioux tribal wisdom that when your horse dies you should dismount. However, here at the Lancet we have been exploring new ways of dealing with that situation....
Our estimates for the 16–74 years and 75 years and older age groups show that being unvaccinated (strictly maximum dose deficit) was associated with similar or lower hazard ratio for severe COVID-19 outcomes compared with being vaccinated but having a vaccine deficit of at least one dose. This association could be due to vaccine waning and the fact that the most recent dose for those with a vaccine deficit frequently occurred many months before the study start date. The association could also be due to an uncontrolled selection effect for healthier individuals being more likely to be unvaccinated.
Since the jabs destroy the immune system, it make sense that the vaccinated are more DISEASED and likely to meet with an early grave. Which is the ENTIRE POINT of the jabs.
Is there any real reason, other than narrative control (don't count early deaths from the vaccine in the vaccinated column), why the definition of vaccinated doesn't kick in for some State defined period (2 week in the US)? What happens to the study if anyone getting the vaccine is identified as vaccinated before they leave the doctor's office, if they do?
It's hard for them to cover their asses when it comes to the dangers of the bioweapon death jab when "real" people are dropping dead right in front of "real" humans; the number of people that I know who died suddenly from the death jab eight; the number of people that I know that died from COVID ZERO!!! It's time to start charging these people (Bill Gates, Joe Biden, and the rest) with murder or conspiracy to murder!
I've witnessed the same except only 3 deaths. But I've witnessed myocarditis, clots, and cancers in family, friends, neighbors, and my wife's colleagues. Those who didn't take the bioweapon to intentionally murder is doing well. Even the unjabbed people I know who had covid, whatever it was, are doing fine.
I feel sorry and pray for the people who still have the blinders on! I used to get frustrated with them, but now I understand. I understand how Big Pharma and their doctors deceived them!
Subject line; My condolences re your illness and death
Lancet editorial staff-
I saw your recent article discussing vaccine hesitancy.
Have you asked yourself why this would be?
The simple fact that people are dropping dead or maimed post Covid vaccination is so painfully obvious now, except to you, apparently.
No amount of Big Pharma Shill money can regain the respect and trust of the people. You have signed not only your own death warrent, but that of all of Big Pharma and the medical industry. How does that money taste?
You have to ask, was it mere happenstance for the government that media coverage of this report seems to have been conveniently timed to coincide Andrew Bridgen's excess deaths debate ?
I remember when they said that not only were the unvaccinated primarily people of no education - but also more unhealthy than normal.
It seems now that contrary to all the usual statistics that shows that people with no or little education is less healthy than others - now "we" are suddenly the most healthy...
The internal inconsistencies in their argumentation these "highly educated" experts are able to conjure with a straight face is amazing...
I remember them saying this about the education but not the unhealthy part. LOL!
I did see a graph that broke down who took the vaccine based on their indoc... education. Those who had a HS diploma were the least likely to take it along with those who had a PhD. Those with a bachelors and masters were most likely to take it.
I know my brother's wife who has a PhD took it. Her mom took it and died. He never graduated HS since he went into the Marines when he was 16. My mom signed his release. He did get his GED later in life and made it through 2 semesters of college before quitting. For some reason, he knew better than to take it.
Who incidentally were also the ones that continuously has been off by factors of 50-100 when promoting beneficial effects of mandates and lockdowns amongst many other events.. Check John Hopkins working paper on lockdowns.
"Undervaccinated" that's funny. My own data shows that the REASON most people refuse MORE jabs, is because they've suffered badly, and/or WITNESSED someone else suffer badly (or even DIE) after getting vaccinated.
It's OBVIOUS that the primary event that causes people to refuse more jabs is EXPERIENCE with the jabs, thus producing more "undervaccinated" people. And even people who take 30 jabs per year could end up being classified as "undervaccinated" or even "unvaccinated" because the CDC keeps approving more weird vaccines and placing them on their recommended list of jabs. If someone misses even ONE of their jabs, they get labelled "unvaccinated" or "under-vaccinated."
In their eyes, EVERYONE is ALWAYS "undervaccinated."
The measure always seems to be "vaccination" not actual health. Aside, from the cold hard fact that covid 'vaccines are in fact not vaccines like previous iterations of live-attenuated, inactivated virus antigens etc.. but actually transfections (a wholly different biological mechanism), the recurring theme in all of this is that medical establishment doesn't actually seem to care whether people are provably healthier with vaccines (of any kind). That is just assumed to be true and never ever questioned.
“The data that were used in this study are highly sensitive and are not available publicly” is all you need to know to not bother reading in detail. I remember the Lancet paper on how useless hydroxychloroquine was based on data so sensitive that it could not even be found. Otherwise the confounding factors that could be roughly classed as healthy use bias I would think swamp any of the results of analysis.
Surely there is more to life than being vaccinated or not vacinated (however defined)? In between vaccine boosters my wife and I have caught covid at least twice that we know of (home test confirmed). Most recently she caught it (despite having Autumn 23 booster) and failed to infect me with it (Autumnn 23 booster declined). Nature seems to be doing a better job than pharma.
Can you explain how1200 adverse reactions occurred in such a small number... they increased the number participating in phase two and three to thin out the adverse ratio but even then 40,000 divided by 1200 reactions equates to a 1:33 chance of illness or death... then to open up the control group and inject them fudged them numbers yet again... surely this is criminal malfeasance at such a high level when you consider how many people got hoodwinked into taking such a bad product.
Shoot the lot of them and mostly that demonic twisted little gnome Blair after his recent outrage - we’re getting close to another pandemic lying toad 🐸
It is Sioux tribal wisdom that when your horse dies you should dismount. However, here at the Lancet we have been exploring new ways of dealing with that situation....
Your horse didn’t die. It was just underbreathing.
Did you notice this snippet?
Our estimates for the 16–74 years and 75 years and older age groups show that being unvaccinated (strictly maximum dose deficit) was associated with similar or lower hazard ratio for severe COVID-19 outcomes compared with being vaccinated but having a vaccine deficit of at least one dose. This association could be due to vaccine waning and the fact that the most recent dose for those with a vaccine deficit frequently occurred many months before the study start date. The association could also be due to an uncontrolled selection effect for healthier individuals being more likely to be unvaccinated.
https://nakedemperor.substack.com/p/lancet-study-confirms-unvaccinated
I have added the link to your substack. Many thanks for that.
Great, thanks!
Murderers
Since the jabs destroy the immune system, it make sense that the vaccinated are more DISEASED and likely to meet with an early grave. Which is the ENTIRE POINT of the jabs.
Yes, they are more diseased and more deceased.
Is there any real reason, other than narrative control (don't count early deaths from the vaccine in the vaccinated column), why the definition of vaccinated doesn't kick in for some State defined period (2 week in the US)? What happens to the study if anyone getting the vaccine is identified as vaccinated before they leave the doctor's office, if they do?
It's hard for them to cover their asses when it comes to the dangers of the bioweapon death jab when "real" people are dropping dead right in front of "real" humans; the number of people that I know who died suddenly from the death jab eight; the number of people that I know that died from COVID ZERO!!! It's time to start charging these people (Bill Gates, Joe Biden, and the rest) with murder or conspiracy to murder!
I've witnessed the same except only 3 deaths. But I've witnessed myocarditis, clots, and cancers in family, friends, neighbors, and my wife's colleagues. Those who didn't take the bioweapon to intentionally murder is doing well. Even the unjabbed people I know who had covid, whatever it was, are doing fine.
I feel sorry and pray for the people who still have the blinders on! I used to get frustrated with them, but now I understand. I understand how Big Pharma and their doctors deceived them!
Agreed, especially B. Gates!
I think old Joe is too clueless to know fully what’s going on.
Many former D voters have tumbled to the reality of Joe's walking deadness. Cf. "Christian Scientist with appendicitis."
Wrote this to the Lancet (editorial@lancet.com) just now.
Subject line; My condolences re your illness and death
Lancet editorial staff-
I saw your recent article discussing vaccine hesitancy.
Have you asked yourself why this would be?
The simple fact that people are dropping dead or maimed post Covid vaccination is so painfully obvious now, except to you, apparently.
No amount of Big Pharma Shill money can regain the respect and trust of the people. You have signed not only your own death warrent, but that of all of Big Pharma and the medical industry. How does that money taste?
The vaccine game is up.
Sincerely,
J. Sauriol Portland, OR.
I am so proud of you. Love to you
Good for you!
We need to put pressure on these shills.
I’ve written to numerous covid villains since 2021. Only one ever responded. (Praising the injections).
I’ve also written to some of the covid good guys since 2021. Almost all have replied.
Conclusion: the villains are defensive; the good guys aren’t!
You have to ask, was it mere happenstance for the government that media coverage of this report seems to have been conveniently timed to coincide Andrew Bridgen's excess deaths debate ?
Highly sensitive data? Bless it, sensitive to what exactly? The light of day? 🤣
Bolted, stable, horse, door.......rearrange this to obtain the answer.
Here is another sentence.. join in the correct order and you get a free body bag.
Toxic ... Nurse.... Needle ... Arm .. Vaccine .. reaction... CPR... Jabs .. Uses...tries...Bad.... into..of ...
Congratulations.. you win a death certificate devoid of cause .. and one body bag.
I remember when they said that not only were the unvaccinated primarily people of no education - but also more unhealthy than normal.
It seems now that contrary to all the usual statistics that shows that people with no or little education is less healthy than others - now "we" are suddenly the most healthy...
The internal inconsistencies in their argumentation these "highly educated" experts are able to conjure with a straight face is amazing...
I remember them saying this about the education but not the unhealthy part. LOL!
I did see a graph that broke down who took the vaccine based on their indoc... education. Those who had a HS diploma were the least likely to take it along with those who had a PhD. Those with a bachelors and masters were most likely to take it.
I know my brother's wife who has a PhD took it. Her mom took it and died. He never graduated HS since he went into the Marines when he was 16. My mom signed his release. He did get his GED later in life and made it through 2 semesters of college before quitting. For some reason, he knew better than to take it.
https://www.imperial.ac.uk/news/177249/early-death-health-linked-socioeconomic-status/
Who incidentally were also the ones that continuously has been off by factors of 50-100 when promoting beneficial effects of mandates and lockdowns amongst many other events.. Check John Hopkins working paper on lockdowns.
Thank you for reporting.
"Undervaccinated" that's funny. My own data shows that the REASON most people refuse MORE jabs, is because they've suffered badly, and/or WITNESSED someone else suffer badly (or even DIE) after getting vaccinated.
It's OBVIOUS that the primary event that causes people to refuse more jabs is EXPERIENCE with the jabs, thus producing more "undervaccinated" people. And even people who take 30 jabs per year could end up being classified as "undervaccinated" or even "unvaccinated" because the CDC keeps approving more weird vaccines and placing them on their recommended list of jabs. If someone misses even ONE of their jabs, they get labelled "unvaccinated" or "under-vaccinated."
In their eyes, EVERYONE is ALWAYS "undervaccinated."
Well said.
Thanks.
The measure always seems to be "vaccination" not actual health. Aside, from the cold hard fact that covid 'vaccines are in fact not vaccines like previous iterations of live-attenuated, inactivated virus antigens etc.. but actually transfections (a wholly different biological mechanism), the recurring theme in all of this is that medical establishment doesn't actually seem to care whether people are provably healthier with vaccines (of any kind). That is just assumed to be true and never ever questioned.
“The data that were used in this study are highly sensitive and are not available publicly” is all you need to know to not bother reading in detail. I remember the Lancet paper on how useless hydroxychloroquine was based on data so sensitive that it could not even be found. Otherwise the confounding factors that could be roughly classed as healthy use bias I would think swamp any of the results of analysis.
Educated idiots.
Yet another self-contradictory article from the censored, er sorry peer-reviewed, medical press. This is the standard we love! :-)
Surely there is more to life than being vaccinated or not vacinated (however defined)? In between vaccine boosters my wife and I have caught covid at least twice that we know of (home test confirmed). Most recently she caught it (despite having Autumn 23 booster) and failed to infect me with it (Autumnn 23 booster declined). Nature seems to be doing a better job than pharma.
Please stop “boosting” ASAP. You are ONLY boosting your chances to die.
Vaccines are barbaric, disease-causing murder weapons.
Pfizer enrolled 360 in to two cohorts for phase 1... https://www.pfizer.com/news/press-release/press-release-detail/pfizer_and_biontech_dose_first_participants_in_the_u_s_as_part_of_global_covid_19_mrna_vaccine_development_program
Can you explain how1200 adverse reactions occurred in such a small number... they increased the number participating in phase two and three to thin out the adverse ratio but even then 40,000 divided by 1200 reactions equates to a 1:33 chance of illness or death... then to open up the control group and inject them fudged them numbers yet again... surely this is criminal malfeasance at such a high level when you consider how many people got hoodwinked into taking such a bad product.
Shoot the lot of them and mostly that demonic twisted little gnome Blair after his recent outrage - we’re getting close to another pandemic lying toad 🐸
Read Sasha Latypova Due Diligence and Art and Katherine Watt's Bailiwick News then you'll understand 👍