In August 2023 we published this article describing Cheryl Grainger’s tenacious attempts to get MHRA to release the data it has been holding for 3 years now about the 2000 pregnant women who were vaccinated in the first half of 2021 who the MHRA were supposed to have been monitoring. The MHRA refused to release the data, citing exemption under Section 22 of the FOI Act; this exemption applies when a ‘future’ report is ‘planned’ to be issued containing the relevant information. They provided no date for when this ‘future’ report might be published. Consequently Cheryl wrote the following letter of complaint to the Information Commissioner's Office:
It’s not in the public interest to know that post-market surveillance probably shows these things are harming pregnant mothers or pregnancies... why? Because then you (a) wouldn’t take our so-called vaccines and (b) you might sue or at the very least vote out the govt/NHS for the harm caused.
But even worse... here is a slap on the wrist with a wet bus ticket for not telling the requestor to sod-off in a timely manner.
Why do we let these bureaucrats continue to lord it over us? The most harmful thing to our personal health and well-being at the moment is the government, politicians and bureaucrats who all claim to be protecting us.
The MHRA, like the ONS before them, have shown themselves not to be working in the best interests of the public they serve (or are supposed to serve).
Congrats to Ms Grainger for her sterling efforts, the official reply from the MHRA was little short of a disgrace
If this is the level of "expertise they have ... "Sometimes, reactions can be part of the condition being treated rather than being caused by the vaccine" then what hope is there?
The issue was vaccinations of pregnant women not "treating" a pre-existing Covid condition, so their comments are complete nonsense (Vaccines don't "treat conditions" anyway, they're designed to hopefully prevent them or at least used to be designed that way)
I’ve also asked the University of Auckland via OIA/FOI for the data they collected then suddenly stopped collecting, from vaccinated pregnant women in NZ.
I’m Canadian. My daughter in law was jabbed whilst pregnant and breast fed. Kevin McKernan genomics guy found the contaminated plasmid DNA in breast milk. I have been an anxious mess over all this deceit. My granddaughter has been slow. Her walking was delayed. She’ll be three in July and doesn’t speak well at all for a three year old. She was hospitalized with severe RSV last year. She was born with, as the doctor’s proclaimed a hernia that’s the largest they’ve ever seen on a baby. My son and daughter in law finally have an appointment at McMaster this Thursday April 11/24 to schedule surgery. It’s conspicuous that governments worldwide are hiding data or passively collecting data. Extreme in their denial of serious side effects. Where are they getting their science information? From pharma, who fund our overseeing health agencies? The shots were rushed to market but no diagnostic tests exist for injuries. Dr. Phillip Buckhaults molecular biologist and cancer geneticist at the university of South Carolina verified the discovery of the contaminated plasmid DNA in the vials and spoke to the senate in a hearing in South Carolina. He just received his IRB approval and is now testing unidentified tissue samples sent to his lab from around the world. I’m sure not many pathologists know this. With all the censorship going on I would be surprised if this information ever sees the light of day. Too much at stake for the very wealthy, influential and powerful investors that includes big pharma.
At risk of further distancing myself from family members who have produced children over the past few yrs, I cannot ask any of them about their vaxx status nor adverse events. I do know one baby, now 15 months old screamed her whole first year as in severe colic. She vomited curdled breast milk, now has delayed speech and walking. The family put the screaming down to teething, but I note they took the baby to urgent care on two occasions, they were obviously concerned.
In my immediate circle in the last year - 4 pregnancies:
The first, said by doctors to be going very well, miscarried after 4 months;
Second, said to be going very well then the mother got shingles & pre-eclampsia & gave birth over a month early;
Third, thought by doctors to start well then the mother was rushed to hospital for emergency surgery with an ectopic pregnancy. The embryo & Fallopian tube were removed.
The fourth - in month 4 - is going well so far.
Guess which 3 women had 3 injections & which woman had NONE....
Commercial interest… published according to scheduled - but the schedule is secret and it has already been 2.5 years with numerous pregnant women being injected.
The efforts being made on our behalf by Cheryl Grainger and yourselves are much appreciated by those of us who are banging our heads against the wall of the system every day. The mRNA vaccine platforms are at the ready for population level bio-engineering so of course they can not be challenged. British oligarchs are at the fore front of this industry but the metaverse is a global project.
'A new mRNA cancer vaccine being trialled in the UK could herald the “dawn of a new age” of treatments for the disease, a scientist has suggested'.
It’s all just criminal. Pregnant women and their unborn babies should never been given unsafe or dangerous anything nor should anyone else. Not releasing data is proof they have much to hide. What has happened during Covid is a completely unethical response. We no longer can trust anything, especially from our federal agencies. They are supposed to protect us, and instead they protect Big Pharma, their financially lifeline. What a mess…..🙄
1) ICO decision point 23: The MHRA stated that it: “remains fully committed to publishing the data from Yellow Card Vaccine Monitor and sharing this with the public, and we consider that the time needed for full analysis and the preparation of appropriate scientific commentary, which will then be scrutinised both internally and through external peer review, is of greatest public interest, as it ensures thorough scientific rigour is maintained and applied throughout.”
Yet Dr June Raine has already admitted what that "time needed" is all about, they won't understand benefit/risk until years in the future when they should have known it already, implicating current harms and a lack of precautionary principle. Look at this video.
2) Table 7 indicates drop out rates were high for the 2nd dose, particularly apparent amongst the elderly who should have been 2nd dose vaccinated by then. Why?
3) The remit of the YCVM report was inappropriate. It was centered around the demographics who received an injury, instead of the injuries received from any demographic. Case in point, they failed to distinguish between serious and non-serious reactions
4) Same interim-only release happened with the V- Safe pregnancy data also known as the Shimabukuro paper. Did I misinterpret this article that it will be released by end 2025? How many other major pregnancy papers had final outcomes denied/held back?
I say "Thank God for the peer review standard for the data release on the results of the Covid shots in pregnant women". Obviously, the results must be so good they need the calmer minds of the peer review process to curb the enthusiasm of the overly exultant authors. Only a fool or a conspiracy theorist would think otherwise.
Besides, the peer review process is the universally acknowledged Gold Standard (as in quality, not as in money) for prudent decision making! And everybody knows during Covid, whether releasing data or releasing experimental gene therapies on billions of people, including pregnant women, everything has been done to the highest Gold Standards ( again - quality, not money). Besides what is more important, prudently releasing the Covid shots or prudently releasing the Covid pregnancy data?
Why, in the USA, the Pfizer booster shots were so extensively studied, they were not publicly released, or mandated, until the results of testing on 8 rats was complete. If the unanimous agreement of 8 rats doesn't signify the epitome of the peer review process, what does?
Besides, everyone knows that the UK government is conducting the most honest, open, and thorough review of the government's Covid actions in the world. Isn't that review being conducted by a Peer of the Realm? Isn't that literally a Peer Review? Isn't that Peer Reviewed a kind of a Gold Standard (again - quality, not in money).
So hooray for the peer (or Peer) review process standard! We shouldn't demand anything less. Or do I smell a rat?
It has been interesting to watch how people here reacted to the recent airing of the Mr Bates vs The Post Office show on TV. It blows me away how many people won't be outraged or even acknowledge anything until the idiot box tells them to.
It's such a hard road to awaken people without access to that medium. But I admire everyone who keeps trying. Thank you.
This is not the first time the MHRA has been pinned to the wall for not doing its job.
I suspect dragging its heels in this instance is in line with June Raine’s recent commitment to the organisation becoming an “enabler”, serving the perceived ‘greater good’ by defending and protecting the reputation of the mRNA platform at almost any cost.
History will likely show this myopic stance served the reputational and commercial interests of the medical and pharmaceutical establishment rather than patient’s health. We can only hope that it does not require a scandal on the scale of the Thalidomide debacle to make the point.
I love it...
It’s not in the public interest to know that post-market surveillance probably shows these things are harming pregnant mothers or pregnancies... why? Because then you (a) wouldn’t take our so-called vaccines and (b) you might sue or at the very least vote out the govt/NHS for the harm caused.
But even worse... here is a slap on the wrist with a wet bus ticket for not telling the requestor to sod-off in a timely manner.
Why do we let these bureaucrats continue to lord it over us? The most harmful thing to our personal health and well-being at the moment is the government, politicians and bureaucrats who all claim to be protecting us.
What do the Feds always say about privacy? If you have nothing to hide...
The MHRA, like the ONS before them, have shown themselves not to be working in the best interests of the public they serve (or are supposed to serve).
Congrats to Ms Grainger for her sterling efforts, the official reply from the MHRA was little short of a disgrace
If this is the level of "expertise they have ... "Sometimes, reactions can be part of the condition being treated rather than being caused by the vaccine" then what hope is there?
The issue was vaccinations of pregnant women not "treating" a pre-existing Covid condition, so their comments are complete nonsense (Vaccines don't "treat conditions" anyway, they're designed to hopefully prevent them or at least used to be designed that way)
I’ve also asked the University of Auckland via OIA/FOI for the data they collected then suddenly stopped collecting, from vaccinated pregnant women in NZ.
I’m Canadian. My daughter in law was jabbed whilst pregnant and breast fed. Kevin McKernan genomics guy found the contaminated plasmid DNA in breast milk. I have been an anxious mess over all this deceit. My granddaughter has been slow. Her walking was delayed. She’ll be three in July and doesn’t speak well at all for a three year old. She was hospitalized with severe RSV last year. She was born with, as the doctor’s proclaimed a hernia that’s the largest they’ve ever seen on a baby. My son and daughter in law finally have an appointment at McMaster this Thursday April 11/24 to schedule surgery. It’s conspicuous that governments worldwide are hiding data or passively collecting data. Extreme in their denial of serious side effects. Where are they getting their science information? From pharma, who fund our overseeing health agencies? The shots were rushed to market but no diagnostic tests exist for injuries. Dr. Phillip Buckhaults molecular biologist and cancer geneticist at the university of South Carolina verified the discovery of the contaminated plasmid DNA in the vials and spoke to the senate in a hearing in South Carolina. He just received his IRB approval and is now testing unidentified tissue samples sent to his lab from around the world. I’m sure not many pathologists know this. With all the censorship going on I would be surprised if this information ever sees the light of day. Too much at stake for the very wealthy, influential and powerful investors that includes big pharma.
At risk of further distancing myself from family members who have produced children over the past few yrs, I cannot ask any of them about their vaxx status nor adverse events. I do know one baby, now 15 months old screamed her whole first year as in severe colic. She vomited curdled breast milk, now has delayed speech and walking. The family put the screaming down to teething, but I note they took the baby to urgent care on two occasions, they were obviously concerned.
In my immediate circle in the last year - 4 pregnancies:
The first, said by doctors to be going very well, miscarried after 4 months;
Second, said to be going very well then the mother got shingles & pre-eclampsia & gave birth over a month early;
Third, thought by doctors to start well then the mother was rushed to hospital for emergency surgery with an ectopic pregnancy. The embryo & Fallopian tube were removed.
The fourth - in month 4 - is going well so far.
Guess which 3 women had 3 injections & which woman had NONE....
.....You guessed correctly.
Commercial interest… published according to scheduled - but the schedule is secret and it has already been 2.5 years with numerous pregnant women being injected.
Shameful response indeed
The efforts being made on our behalf by Cheryl Grainger and yourselves are much appreciated by those of us who are banging our heads against the wall of the system every day. The mRNA vaccine platforms are at the ready for population level bio-engineering so of course they can not be challenged. British oligarchs are at the fore front of this industry but the metaverse is a global project.
'A new mRNA cancer vaccine being trialled in the UK could herald the “dawn of a new age” of treatments for the disease, a scientist has suggested'.
The Independent.4.2.24
It’s all just criminal. Pregnant women and their unborn babies should never been given unsafe or dangerous anything nor should anyone else. Not releasing data is proof they have much to hide. What has happened during Covid is a completely unethical response. We no longer can trust anything, especially from our federal agencies. They are supposed to protect us, and instead they protect Big Pharma, their financially lifeline. What a mess…..🙄
Please appeal!!
1) ICO decision point 23: The MHRA stated that it: “remains fully committed to publishing the data from Yellow Card Vaccine Monitor and sharing this with the public, and we consider that the time needed for full analysis and the preparation of appropriate scientific commentary, which will then be scrutinised both internally and through external peer review, is of greatest public interest, as it ensures thorough scientific rigour is maintained and applied throughout.”
Yet Dr June Raine has already admitted what that "time needed" is all about, they won't understand benefit/risk until years in the future when they should have known it already, implicating current harms and a lack of precautionary principle. Look at this video.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/bQfgtqgGk7yL/
2) Table 7 indicates drop out rates were high for the 2nd dose, particularly apparent amongst the elderly who should have been 2nd dose vaccinated by then. Why?
3) The remit of the YCVM report was inappropriate. It was centered around the demographics who received an injury, instead of the injuries received from any demographic. Case in point, they failed to distinguish between serious and non-serious reactions
4) Same interim-only release happened with the V- Safe pregnancy data also known as the Shimabukuro paper. Did I misinterpret this article that it will be released by end 2025? How many other major pregnancy papers had final outcomes denied/held back?
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2104983
And this post just this moment released also seems most pertinent...? https://open.substack.com/pub/trusttheevidence/p/crossed-harms?r=qp4x9&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post
I say "Thank God for the peer review standard for the data release on the results of the Covid shots in pregnant women". Obviously, the results must be so good they need the calmer minds of the peer review process to curb the enthusiasm of the overly exultant authors. Only a fool or a conspiracy theorist would think otherwise.
Besides, the peer review process is the universally acknowledged Gold Standard (as in quality, not as in money) for prudent decision making! And everybody knows during Covid, whether releasing data or releasing experimental gene therapies on billions of people, including pregnant women, everything has been done to the highest Gold Standards ( again - quality, not money). Besides what is more important, prudently releasing the Covid shots or prudently releasing the Covid pregnancy data?
Why, in the USA, the Pfizer booster shots were so extensively studied, they were not publicly released, or mandated, until the results of testing on 8 rats was complete. If the unanimous agreement of 8 rats doesn't signify the epitome of the peer review process, what does?
Besides, everyone knows that the UK government is conducting the most honest, open, and thorough review of the government's Covid actions in the world. Isn't that review being conducted by a Peer of the Realm? Isn't that literally a Peer Review? Isn't that Peer Reviewed a kind of a Gold Standard (again - quality, not in money).
So hooray for the peer (or Peer) review process standard! We shouldn't demand anything less. Or do I smell a rat?
It has been interesting to watch how people here reacted to the recent airing of the Mr Bates vs The Post Office show on TV. It blows me away how many people won't be outraged or even acknowledge anything until the idiot box tells them to.
It's such a hard road to awaken people without access to that medium. But I admire everyone who keeps trying. Thank you.
This is not the first time the MHRA has been pinned to the wall for not doing its job.
I suspect dragging its heels in this instance is in line with June Raine’s recent commitment to the organisation becoming an “enabler”, serving the perceived ‘greater good’ by defending and protecting the reputation of the mRNA platform at almost any cost.
History will likely show this myopic stance served the reputational and commercial interests of the medical and pharmaceutical establishment rather than patient’s health. We can only hope that it does not require a scandal on the scale of the Thalidomide debacle to make the point.
Absolutely abhorrent and unconscionable. I hope this gets picked up by gb news and dr. Campbell and other alternative news sources.