This is why you win the argument very time, proper science with data behind every statement, no sweeping statements like "we really know", only lying politicians use lines like this. And most refreshing is admitting what you don't know. Like a breath of fresh air, great work.
I don’t think either thing exists other than as a name to call a collection of symptoms, which are actually bodily functions to detox the lymphatic system.
odd timing that the powers that be waited till the year sfter Kary Mullis died , he being the Nobel winner for the invention of the pcr test , also very same guy who stated , specifically and emphatically , that the pcr test was NOT designed to test for an active viral load , as by it's very design of magnified cellular data , would dredge up anything and everything in the bloodstream regardless of the age of the data , with no definitive way to differentiate
Jun 9, 2023·edited Jun 9, 2023Liked by Jonathan Engler
"We really know" - Ridiculous. Almost disqualifies them from any serious discussion.
I've been working on COVID data for 18 months now and still feel like I know nothing. So much uncertainty, it's insane. One just has to learn to take uncertainty into account at all times. It's everywhere.
I think we need a death survey (a bit like Clare Craig originally proposed) and estimate all the causes of death in 4 categories probably by age group and by year. Is this something you guys can do? I expect it will show how little C-19 itself was a problem and how badly the government overreacted and how damaging those actions were.
NORMAL BACKGROUND LEVEL DEATHS
AVOIDABLE EXCESS DEATHS - DUE TO GOVERNMENT COVID MEASURES
"Suicides" - due to depression, frustration, isolation etc.
"Hospital evacuation deaths" - caused by patients moved into care homes without testing
"Preventable C-19 deaths" - due to restricted treatment protocols (e.g. banning Ivermectin)
"False C-19 deaths" with false positive PCR test i.e. they didn't have C-19
"C-19 deaths" where C-19 was not the real cause i.e. 'with' not 'from' C-19
"Midazolam deaths" - due to DNR and other life ending treatments
"Remdesivir deaths" - from the precription of Remdesivir
"Jab induced C-19 deaths" - due to post vax suppressed immune system
"Really Know" is code for I don't know shit. How many times have we been told we really know, like if you take the vaccine you won't get sick or die or transmit the virus and it safe too. How many lies does it take to wake up?
Under the interferon theory, those with arthritis, nephritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, HSV, hep, diabetes, cancer and autoimmune afflictions should rarely catch cold or the flu. NOT. The exact mechanism of viral interference aka superinfection resistance is unknown. What you seek may be found in RNAi, altered gene expression, mutated viral proteins, swarms and persistence. Since your on the same team, Cullen, Neil, Engler and yourself should join forces on this issue. Meanwhile, sloppy "hitmen" are pitting you against one another... https://dailysceptic.org/2023/06/08/how-we-know-flu-really-did-disappear-in-2020-and-2021/
Given whats emerged, highly likely. Rotten to the core .
One thing is for sure, all trust in Government and its agencies has gone for good.
I have had a number of dealing with OFCOM and indeed the MHRA over the last three years and I can only conclude they are, or facilitate, the biggest disinformation spreaders of all.
The PCR test that drove EVERYTHING is meaningless bullshit, easily manipulated for the desired result. If there was something out there , which there probably wasn't, then the EVIL authorities (via the corrupt to the core World Health Organisation) certainly don't know what it is. A bit like EVERY germ theory derived 'virus'
The only thing SARS-CoV-2 out competed was the brain capacity of the majority of the population.
I read the article this morning with some dismay. Sadly this is the feeling I have on an increasing regularity when reading the DS.
This is why you win the argument very time, proper science with data behind every statement, no sweeping statements like "we really know", only lying politicians use lines like this. And most refreshing is admitting what you don't know. Like a breath of fresh air, great work.
What is the point of testing?
Apart from being another money-making racket?
And creating manufactured crises to fear-monger and control the population…
I don’t think either thing exists other than as a name to call a collection of symptoms, which are actually bodily functions to detox the lymphatic system.
odd timing that the powers that be waited till the year sfter Kary Mullis died , he being the Nobel winner for the invention of the pcr test , also very same guy who stated , specifically and emphatically , that the pcr test was NOT designed to test for an active viral load , as by it's very design of magnified cellular data , would dredge up anything and everything in the bloodstream regardless of the age of the data , with no definitive way to differentiate
"We really know" - Ridiculous. Almost disqualifies them from any serious discussion.
I've been working on COVID data for 18 months now and still feel like I know nothing. So much uncertainty, it's insane. One just has to learn to take uncertainty into account at all times. It's everywhere.
I agree with the criticisms here of DS, but it's still way better than anything in MSM - that's the appropriate comparison in my view
I think we need a death survey (a bit like Clare Craig originally proposed) and estimate all the causes of death in 4 categories probably by age group and by year. Is this something you guys can do? I expect it will show how little C-19 itself was a problem and how badly the government overreacted and how damaging those actions were.
NORMAL BACKGROUND LEVEL DEATHS
AVOIDABLE EXCESS DEATHS - DUE TO GOVERNMENT COVID MEASURES
"Suicides" - due to depression, frustration, isolation etc.
"Hospital evacuation deaths" - caused by patients moved into care homes without testing
"Preventable C-19 deaths" - due to restricted treatment protocols (e.g. banning Ivermectin)
"False C-19 deaths" with false positive PCR test i.e. they didn't have C-19
"C-19 deaths" where C-19 was not the real cause i.e. 'with' not 'from' C-19
"Midazolam deaths" - due to DNR and other life ending treatments
"Remdesivir deaths" - from the precription of Remdesivir
"Jab induced C-19 deaths" - due to post vax suppressed immune system
"Vax deaths" - jab induced myocarditis, blood clots, nervous damage etc.
"Nosocomial infections" - deaths from disease caught in hospital
"Lockdown deaths" - due to loneliness , poverty etc.
"Vaccine hesitancy deaths" - lack of normal vaccination due to mistrust
"Neo-natal vax deaths" - miscarriages, still births and baby deaths
"Iatrogenic deaths" - intubation etc.
"<21 days vax deaths" - miscategorised as unvaxed <14/21 days after jab
"NHS neglect deaths" - from over concentration on C-19
UNAVOIDABLE EXCESS DEATHS INCORRECTLY ATTRIBUTED TO C-19
"Flu deaths" - C-19 attributed deaths actually from flu
UNAVOIDABLE EXCESS DEATHS CORRECTLY ATTRIBUTED TO C-19
"Real C-19 deaths"
"Falsely unattributed C-19 deaths" - false negative PCR diagnoses
TOTAL DEATHS
I wonder if Will Jones will change his mind when he sees what the CDC was telling clinical labs to do/not do? Probably not.
"Really Know" is code for I don't know shit. How many times have we been told we really know, like if you take the vaccine you won't get sick or die or transmit the virus and it safe too. How many lies does it take to wake up?
.
They're In Trouble Now.
There Is Nothing In The Air.
- Not With Gain Of Function.
That's The Hoax.
- And You Figured It Out.
.
Neil, Engler - Left this at Eugyppius - https://www.eugyppius.com/p/after-three-years-of-studiously-ignoring/comment/17121069
Under the interferon theory, those with arthritis, nephritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, HSV, hep, diabetes, cancer and autoimmune afflictions should rarely catch cold or the flu. NOT. The exact mechanism of viral interference aka superinfection resistance is unknown. What you seek may be found in RNAi, altered gene expression, mutated viral proteins, swarms and persistence. Since your on the same team, Cullen, Neil, Engler and yourself should join forces on this issue. Meanwhile, sloppy "hitmen" are pitting you against one another... https://dailysceptic.org/2023/06/08/how-we-know-flu-really-did-disappear-in-2020-and-2021/
Given whats emerged, highly likely. Rotten to the core .
One thing is for sure, all trust in Government and its agencies has gone for good.
I have had a number of dealing with OFCOM and indeed the MHRA over the last three years and I can only conclude they are, or facilitate, the biggest disinformation spreaders of all.
Thank you, thank you, O Skeptic!
The PCR test that drove EVERYTHING is meaningless bullshit, easily manipulated for the desired result. If there was something out there , which there probably wasn't, then the EVIL authorities (via the corrupt to the core World Health Organisation) certainly don't know what it is. A bit like EVERY germ theory derived 'virus'