In episode #179 ‘Science Strong and Fragile’ Bret Weinstein and Heather Heying discuss in depth our substack article on ‘the illusion of vaccine efficacy’ (starting at 31:30). The episode is available on your favourite podcast platforms, including Rumble, Spotify and Apple podcasts.
On the childhood vaccine topic, are you familiar with the book "Turtles All The Way Down"? It covers all the official literature, and shows among other things how none of the vaccines on the schedule were tested against a true saline placebo.
The chapter on polio is particularly fascinating / damming
I wonder how rare this is, and in this case is it to provide a 'see we do use saline when appropriate'. Two years ago I wrote to friends about how I saw what was going on with covid and did note that the two week shift would mess up the data for the statistics but did not note the crucial artefact that you work out. I have worked with PDEs, very little statistics. I cannot believe that the statisticians who did the efficacy analysis did not know this effect so have to assume it was deliberate. If any say they did not realise this, they should be out of a job immediately.
Weinstein and Heying admit to struggling to get their mind round the effect but as, Norman has shown, it is equivalent to something simple to understand - using a cases figure that is two/three weeks (depending on the chosen period) out of date - during that period the number of people vaccinated has clearly increased so the cases/vaccinated person is artificially low. This means it is very easy to correct for it. Just use the vaccinated population from 2/3 weeks before the cases data. Has anyone done this? Do we know the ONS has not done it?
Also worth noting that the size of the effect is a function of the difference in the vaccinated population in the current week and the vaccinated population 2/3 weeks ago. So it will vary a great deal depending on the speed of roll out for the population in question.
This is a true story. I watched an hour long interview with Tim Ballard, the subject of this movie, and Jim Caviezel. Tim quit his job as a Department of Homeland Security Special Agent so that he could literally, 'save the kids'.
He is 'The Real Deal'. Jim Caviezel is the actor who plays him in this movie.
These men are literally doing 'God's Work', Tim, by performing this work, and Jim by shining a light on this literal EVIL that is among us. For instance, at my workplace, two men were fired and incarcerated within the last 6 months for child pornography. That happened because they were 'incautious' enought to watch it on a government computer. Think of how many are watching on their private computers, and don't get caught. This is a huge problem worldwide, and our country is a primary contributor to this (no other word for it but)…….. Pure Evil.
We have a moral obligation to do what we can to fight against this….
Please help.
Please take a material step and stand up for goodness, on this Independence Day.
This is good that your analysis is getting media exposure!
The third party who was commenting in the Dark Horse podcast (off camera, but with sound) at minute 54:00 gave a remarkably succinct synopsis by saying that, if the observation period was 8 weeks post-jab, then it is as if those vaccinated would actually be observed for 6 weeks, while the unvaccinated would be observed for 10 weeks.
Less simply said, this is because the first two weeks post-jab creates short-lived "phantom" subjects -- ie., those who've been jabbed, but whose infections are counted in the unjabbed group. Like actual phantoms, they are not tied to the human bodies that they originated from.
I think it was Einstein who derided quantum entanglement as being "spooky action at a distance." The COVID data-massaging is a type of spooky infection occuring at a distance from the jabs.
On the childhood vaccine topic, are you familiar with the book "Turtles All The Way Down"? It covers all the official literature, and shows among other things how none of the vaccines on the schedule were tested against a true saline placebo.
The chapter on polio is particularly fascinating / damming
https://www.amazon.com/Turtles-All-Way-Down-Vaccine/dp/9655981045
Oddly, a new vaccine for RSV for the 60+ years does use saline as a placebo in the control group - https://www.fda.gov/media/167805/download
I wonder how rare this is, and in this case is it to provide a 'see we do use saline when appropriate'. Two years ago I wrote to friends about how I saw what was going on with covid and did note that the two week shift would mess up the data for the statistics but did not note the crucial artefact that you work out. I have worked with PDEs, very little statistics. I cannot believe that the statisticians who did the efficacy analysis did not know this effect so have to assume it was deliberate. If any say they did not realise this, they should be out of a job immediately.
And here is important parts of “Turtles all the Way Down” being read by Joel Smalley
https://metatron.substack.com/p/turtles-all-the-way-down-vaccine-6ad#details
https://metatron.substack.com/p/turtles-all-the-way-down-vaccine-5c4#details
I absolutely love the dark horse podcast!!!! Thanks so much for directing people to their awesome discussions.!!!!
That episode started really slowly but was good once it got going. I made the mistake of starting at the beginning instead of 31:30.
Weinstein and Heying admit to struggling to get their mind round the effect but as, Norman has shown, it is equivalent to something simple to understand - using a cases figure that is two/three weeks (depending on the chosen period) out of date - during that period the number of people vaccinated has clearly increased so the cases/vaccinated person is artificially low. This means it is very easy to correct for it. Just use the vaccinated population from 2/3 weeks before the cases data. Has anyone done this? Do we know the ONS has not done it?
Also worth noting that the size of the effect is a function of the difference in the vaccinated population in the current week and the vaccinated population 2/3 weeks ago. So it will vary a great deal depending on the speed of roll out for the population in question.
Both the Weinstein bros are total frauds. Wake the fuck up.
Please…… Help Fight Against the Sale of Children for the Purpose of Sex Trafficking and Child Pornography
1. Watch this entire trailer……
2. Go see this movie when it opens on July 4th, and………
3. Consider Paying it Forward
The Sound of Freedom
https://www.angel.com/pay-it-forward/sound-of-freedom
This is a true story. I watched an hour long interview with Tim Ballard, the subject of this movie, and Jim Caviezel. Tim quit his job as a Department of Homeland Security Special Agent so that he could literally, 'save the kids'.
He is 'The Real Deal'. Jim Caviezel is the actor who plays him in this movie.
These men are literally doing 'God's Work', Tim, by performing this work, and Jim by shining a light on this literal EVIL that is among us. For instance, at my workplace, two men were fired and incarcerated within the last 6 months for child pornography. That happened because they were 'incautious' enought to watch it on a government computer. Think of how many are watching on their private computers, and don't get caught. This is a huge problem worldwide, and our country is a primary contributor to this (no other word for it but)…….. Pure Evil.
We have a moral obligation to do what we can to fight against this….
Please help.
Please take a material step and stand up for goodness, on this Independence Day.
Thank you, Elizabeth
Thanks Gents!
This is good that your analysis is getting media exposure!
The third party who was commenting in the Dark Horse podcast (off camera, but with sound) at minute 54:00 gave a remarkably succinct synopsis by saying that, if the observation period was 8 weeks post-jab, then it is as if those vaccinated would actually be observed for 6 weeks, while the unvaccinated would be observed for 10 weeks.
Less simply said, this is because the first two weeks post-jab creates short-lived "phantom" subjects -- ie., those who've been jabbed, but whose infections are counted in the unjabbed group. Like actual phantoms, they are not tied to the human bodies that they originated from.
I think it was Einstein who derided quantum entanglement as being "spooky action at a distance." The COVID data-massaging is a type of spooky infection occuring at a distance from the jabs.
Gimme a break. They stole the content from John Cullen. Give credit where credit is due.