As an aging doc who has been around the profession for 50+ years, the COVID BioWar on Humankind really forced me to examine the entire vaccine field. Honestly, I have concluded that 99.9% of these are about as effective as medieval indulgences. I can find none - nada - zero - that have been adequately tested for safety and effectiveness. All of the "legacy" vaxxx (polio, DPT, tetanus, etc.) are deeply flawed and suspect. The entire field appears to be a construct for $, power/control, and depopulation. TPTB have been masterful in promoting and enforcing these toxins while ignoring simple boosts to immunity like nutrition and hygiene. Hopefully, this entire madness will go the way of the Dodo.
I too have been on the same path and as a consequence have lost all faith in the NHS. It is incredible that all those vaccine safety and efficacy affirmers simple refuse to examine the history or data. They would rather engage in name calling. Very grown up!
They are hopelessly brain-washed and will willfully line up to board cattlecars for their "showers". Terribly sad. The Ruling Psychopathy has mastered propaganda over the centuries.
I was hoping to have him state that....he would not be resident in Germany if he did so. Free speech in action, even if it does expose supreme lunacy - exactly as it is supposed to do.
Thank you for having the humility to consider that the industry of which you were a part for so long could possibly be wrong in their insistence that "vaccines have saved millions of lives."
May 2, 2023·edited May 2, 2023Liked by Martin Neil
You two, the good Doctor Kendrick and a growing band of like minded medics - sadly my GP practice Doctors ( and their practitioner colleagues) are not so like minded and one immutable reason why I am deeply deeply sceptical...as YGSs
Greetings Sir. Shame that this fellows research & findings took 40 years before publishing. Could have saved a lot of lives if this had been more widely reported.
Awesome article. Any talk of environmental influences on autism rates without even mentioning the vaccines is censored because of concerns it will lead people to study the impact of vaccines. The same is true for any assessments of race and sex prevalence differences and especially of questioning the number of vaccines and the ages and order in which they are administered.
Thank you for your honesty. I have come to the same conclusions albeit I am not as well learned on the studies. Do you have written work proving your findings on the other Vaccines. If yes, you could share it. It would be much appreciated.
Gilead... I appreciate your sincerity and interest in this topic. I do not maintain any posts regarding research. I debated how to answer your query for a couple of days and will have to simply encourage YOU to do your own research, develop your own hypotheses, and arrive at your own conclusions I have learned over the years that the masses are not persuaded by endless regurgitation of absolute;y proven facts, but instead are driven by the herd manipulators. No matter the truth of one's convictions about a subject, the Ruling Psychopathy of today controls the narrative. "They" know well how to manage the perception of billions of people and many (at least 80%, IMO) will freely and unquestioningly follow the objects of their ill-placed faith into oblivion. At root, this is a spiritual issue as people are always looking for their next savior. Today, the collective government of the monolithic Western Five Eyes (5 Ayes) dictatorship (for, this is it truly is) are viewed as the Savior-of-the-Age by their citizens. Not only does the majority of this block accept never-ending war on the "other", but they even accept the techno-totalitarian tyranny of a small group of multi-generational, anti-Humankind, fascistic psychopaths. Sadly, Schwab's prediction that "you will own nothing and be happy" will work fine for too many of our fellow Humans.
Thank you. None of us wanted to believe it, but it is true...our governments have been scamming us. Counting vaccinated people of less than 14 or 21 days as unvaccinated makes no sense unless you deliberately want to deceive. Shameful! It would be very easy to have a 3rd group in addition to vaccinated and unvaccinated groups.
Of course, those in government scam because that is what government is...
More importantly, though, are all those outside of the scam machine like "doctors" indulging in utter and entirely unsupported bullsh*t, particularly regarding injectable junk. Then add in all the "geniuses" among us who work for the companies that make this junk. Add to that all the "great" salespeople who sell the junk to doctors and hospitals. That's a lot of people -- and many of these people are the fathers, mothers, sisters, brothers, cousins of all the adolescents disguised as grownups who remain incredulous over the devastation this crap has caused despite the mountains of evidence that disproves their little fantasies.
But you do have to get off your ass and turn off the tube and read.
We’ve known for well over 150 years the concept of vaccination is a fraud concept.
And the criminals that pose as our elected officials are in on the take and are raking in millions, and will NEVER stop the madness that is called vaccination.
And neither will doctors who are being PAID handsomely for jabbing and lying to their trusting patients.
If you’ve been jabbed then your death will be influenced by and/or directly caused by said jab.
People should quit thinking it’s coincidence. That’s propaganda talk.
And yet the populace of today (being dumbed down by design) have their heads buried in the sand and believe the corrupt media’s story of blaming these deaths on everything else under the sun except the obvious. What a pity.
And those “doctors” who are shilling for the medical cartel, the pharmafia and allopathic medicine should hang their heads in shame.
They know the truth, but have sold their soul to the company because their payment on their yacht, McMansion, and Jag is due.
Pitiful. Sickening, pathetic and pitiful.
And to those in the media, you drug pushing pieces of corporate shit: I hope you have a great answer come your judgment day.
I would love to add Dr. Paul Thomas to the list. A pediatrician who lost his license relatively recently for talking about how kids in his practice were healthier when they were not jabbed versus the jabbed kids.
The statistics are not even massaged. It's straight fraud. The people vaccinated less than 3 weeks previously were counted as vaccinated when the total number of vaccinated was reported, but counted as unvaccinated when an infection showed up. This is not "massaging". It's straight fraud.
Of course, for the actual covid injections as opposed to placebo, the illusion gets an additional “booster” (sorry but couldn’t resist) by virtue of the increased propensity of the injected to become infected during the period when they then become classed as unvaccinated.
And there’s a double booster if that infection then reduces the propensity to become infected later - once classed as vaccinated.
EXCELLENT WORK. I first pointed out that the delay tactic lead to amplified efficacy right after the first clinical trials. Including the patients during that time led to 75% efficacy, not 95%. The trials were fraud. Period. I want to interview you both on Unbreaking Science, please email executiveproducer@unbreakingscience.com
Prof NF, May I suggest you get in touch with Neil Oliver again - he fears no one and if the interview happens that will be a test for OFCOM ......"bring it on".
I think GB News CEO and editors have done for Steyn, neutered Farage - not hard - and must have their sights on NO.....hope you get the gig before all of that; thanks for enlightening this avowed non statistician, once again.
It’s looks clear now everything that the ONS produced should have had a warning attached that read something like ‘This data has not been properly analysed and verified, it can’t be used to draw conclusions about vaccines’.
Instead, we had the media producing articles making claims about how good the vaccines were, the articles included ‘The ONS says .....’ or ‘According to the ONS .......’
Even doctoring up the numbers as they did here the best they can supposedly prove was efficacy of 2 to 3 months waning afterwards , that is a simple business 101 “create a need and then fill that need for profits ”maybe you have to be on a lifelong booster to prevent infection absolute ridiculous of any understanding of vaccines efficacy but this again is not a vaccine it’s an injectable gene therapy.
1) It is important to clarify that the phenomenon of each groups' population sizes changes over time is only applicable to population level data. That aspect of this bias would not occur in a cohort study which would have both group sizes be fixed. I see some people citing your research erroneously in that regard. However other aspects of these biases would still be functioning. And also, in the event of acute negative efficacy, vaccine-caused covid cases would still be censored from the vaccine group (albeit not shifted into the unvaccinated group, as would happen in population level analysis).
2) It would be nice to do another simulation of a cohort study, since those are the ones people really cite which show the cyclical pattern of waning and boosting with new vaccines.
3) One aspect you made me realize just now is that not only do the vaccinated have higher natural immunity due to the requirement to be healthy before vaccination, but for a second reason as well. In the first two weeks after vaccination, you have a chance to develop natural immunity, without getting a counted case of covid! The unvaccinated are not afforded this opportunity. This issue becomes worse if vaccines have an acute negative efficacy. In population level data, this would in essence cause covid to be assigned to the unvaccinated, but the natural immunity be kept for the vaccinated! In a fixed-population-size cohort study, this would cause censoring of covid cases in the vaccinated, but would not "censor" the natural immunity they gained. But as stated, if infection rate is low, this bias may not matter a ton.
There was no doubting the scam very early on. As soon as they were classifying a Covid death as: anyone dying who tested positive 21 days prior, the writing was on the wall.
It is not surprising to me, people are evil and have orchestrated this atrocity. What has been surprising is how many people have been prepared to willingly, often vehemently, play a role in implementing it.
Thanks for the terrific analysis. It gives me both a tool to utilise in countering this madness, and, reassurance in the spark of decency remaining in humanity. Cheers
And if real-world effectiveness is not to your liking, you change the estimator. I noticed that there seems to be quite some nonchalant use of Cox regression going on (but "very recently vaccinated" is never considered as explanatory variable).
As you sort of acknowledge in your May 6 update, this spurious vaccine effectiveness ONLY results if you shift the infections by 2 weeks but not the number vaccinated/uvaccinated (i.e. denominators).
When both are shifted, the correct 0% VE results.
You state that "The answer is that, while those infected within 21 days are classified as unvaccined in observational trials, those who are not infected are generally treated as vaccinated" -- can you list even one vaccine effectiveness study in which this is the case?
The ONS VE study you link does not do this -- it defines vaccinated as >14d after shot, and uses a Cox Regression model using time-varying covariate for vaccine status (thus vaccine status, the denominators, change over time as well).
Most good VE studies use time-varying vaccination status and measure infection rate not as simple "# vaccinated who were infected/# vaccinated", but use person-years to model differing amount of time in each vaccine status for each individual. These studies are exempt from the spurious effect you illustrate here no matter what time frame after shot they use for "fully vaccinated", since both events and time at risk (denominator) are matching.
The only studies affected by this phenomenon you point out are those that use mismatched time frames for events and denominators. I'm not aware of any out of the many dozens of VE studies that have been published so far (perhaps over 100 by now) -- are you aware of any and if so, link them here?
Or are you just pointing out a hypothetical phenomenon, but not sure whether it really impacts any of the real VE studies that have been published to date?
I'd really appreciate Normans's response to these questions. I noticed you also asked these questions on Mathew Crawford's article about this very topic.
Dear Professor Fenton, could you please respond to Professor Morris on these points? Is it true there are no actual VE studies that perpetrate the gross fraud you're purporting to expose here?
As an aging doc who has been around the profession for 50+ years, the COVID BioWar on Humankind really forced me to examine the entire vaccine field. Honestly, I have concluded that 99.9% of these are about as effective as medieval indulgences. I can find none - nada - zero - that have been adequately tested for safety and effectiveness. All of the "legacy" vaxxx (polio, DPT, tetanus, etc.) are deeply flawed and suspect. The entire field appears to be a construct for $, power/control, and depopulation. TPTB have been masterful in promoting and enforcing these toxins while ignoring simple boosts to immunity like nutrition and hygiene. Hopefully, this entire madness will go the way of the Dodo.
I too have been on the same path and as a consequence have lost all faith in the NHS. It is incredible that all those vaccine safety and efficacy affirmers simple refuse to examine the history or data. They would rather engage in name calling. Very grown up!
They are hopelessly brain-washed and will willfully line up to board cattlecars for their "showers". Terribly sad. The Ruling Psychopathy has mastered propaganda over the centuries.
Like Edward Bernays says, "like taking candy from a baby.". So does dog shit taste better than candy? https://www.amazon.com/Propaganda-Master-Doctor-Convinces-Tastes/dp/194485536X/ref=sr_1_13?crid=26FL0QZK4R7RJ&keywords=edward+bernays+book+propaganda&qid=1683043398&sprefix=Edward+ber%2Caps%2C142&sr=8-13
Don't want to leave out the mark in history that Dr. Morris Fishbein also made for propaganda too. Then there is Quack Watch Dr. Stephan Barrett.
It is ironic that you write about brain washing as you cite a fake atrocity you have been brain washed into believing.
Let me guess... Azov Battalion?
BTW, you know nothing of my beliefs. I have studied WWI and WWII history for most of my life and can hold my own in that arena.
In your studies of WWII, did you include this as well?
A piece of gruesome, little known, historical context...
The Childhood Origins of World War II and the Holocaust
https://psychohistory.com/books/the-origins-of-war-in-child-abuse/chapter-6-the-childhood-origins-of-world-war-ii-and-the-holocaust/
Yes. Am familiar with this. There is much validity to this, IMO.
May I suggest you state unequivocally what you mean....
He is suggesting that the industrial extermination of millions of "undesirables" by the Third Reich regime did not happen.
I would suggest re-reading his post. He is noting that both sides in the debate show evidence of being 'brainwashed". It's a fair point.
I was hoping to have him state that....he would not be resident in Germany if he did so. Free speech in action, even if it does expose supreme lunacy - exactly as it is supposed to do.
Thank you for having the humility to consider that the industry of which you were a part for so long could possibly be wrong in their insistence that "vaccines have saved millions of lives."
You two, the good Doctor Kendrick and a growing band of like minded medics - sadly my GP practice Doctors ( and their practitioner colleagues) are not so like minded and one immutable reason why I am deeply deeply sceptical...as YGSs
Greetings Sir. Shame that this fellows research & findings took 40 years before publishing. Could have saved a lot of lives if this had been more widely reported.
VACCINATIONS?
https://ia601302.us.archive.org/12/items/MurderByInjection.EustaceMullins/Murder%20by%20Injection.%20Eustace%20Mullins.pdf
Yes. Had forgotten about Mullins. A warning voice from the past
Thanks. Will read this.
You may like another read here:
https://substack.com/browse/recommendations/post/118207357
Awesome article. Any talk of environmental influences on autism rates without even mentioning the vaccines is censored because of concerns it will lead people to study the impact of vaccines. The same is true for any assessments of race and sex prevalence differences and especially of questioning the number of vaccines and the ages and order in which they are administered.
Very well said
Thank you for your honesty. I have come to the same conclusions albeit I am not as well learned on the studies. Do you have written work proving your findings on the other Vaccines. If yes, you could share it. It would be much appreciated.
Sincerely
Gilead... I appreciate your sincerity and interest in this topic. I do not maintain any posts regarding research. I debated how to answer your query for a couple of days and will have to simply encourage YOU to do your own research, develop your own hypotheses, and arrive at your own conclusions I have learned over the years that the masses are not persuaded by endless regurgitation of absolute;y proven facts, but instead are driven by the herd manipulators. No matter the truth of one's convictions about a subject, the Ruling Psychopathy of today controls the narrative. "They" know well how to manage the perception of billions of people and many (at least 80%, IMO) will freely and unquestioningly follow the objects of their ill-placed faith into oblivion. At root, this is a spiritual issue as people are always looking for their next savior. Today, the collective government of the monolithic Western Five Eyes (5 Ayes) dictatorship (for, this is it truly is) are viewed as the Savior-of-the-Age by their citizens. Not only does the majority of this block accept never-ending war on the "other", but they even accept the techno-totalitarian tyranny of a small group of multi-generational, anti-Humankind, fascistic psychopaths. Sadly, Schwab's prediction that "you will own nothing and be happy" will work fine for too many of our fellow Humans.
Thank you. None of us wanted to believe it, but it is true...our governments have been scamming us. Counting vaccinated people of less than 14 or 21 days as unvaccinated makes no sense unless you deliberately want to deceive. Shameful! It would be very easy to have a 3rd group in addition to vaccinated and unvaccinated groups.
Of course, those in government scam because that is what government is...
More importantly, though, are all those outside of the scam machine like "doctors" indulging in utter and entirely unsupported bullsh*t, particularly regarding injectable junk. Then add in all the "geniuses" among us who work for the companies that make this junk. Add to that all the "great" salespeople who sell the junk to doctors and hospitals. That's a lot of people -- and many of these people are the fathers, mothers, sisters, brothers, cousins of all the adolescents disguised as grownups who remain incredulous over the devastation this crap has caused despite the mountains of evidence that disproves their little fantasies.
I hate to be redundant but...
I’ve said this so many times already and I’ll say it again...and again:
When will people do historical research and find out that anytime you inject anything into your body, you’re on a highway to hell.
NEVER in the history of mankind has injecting poisons into your body given you better health.
Quite the opposite. They’ve ALL maimed and killed. Read and learn the history of this barbaric act:
The Poisoned Needle: Suppressed Facts About Vaccinations https://a.co/d/cfvx9Q6
Dissolving Illusions: Disease, Vaccines, and The Forgotten History https://a.co/d/coVuit4
- George William Winterburn, PhD, MD, The Value of Vaccination: A Non-partisan Review of Its History and Results, 1886
- History and Pathology of Vaccination, Edgar R. Crookshank, 1889
- Charles Creighton, Jenner and Vaccination. A Strange Chapter of Medical History, 1889
https://officialbrendanmurphy.substack.com/p/5-huge-historical-vaccine-frauds
There are many others, they’re just a few.
Finding the truth isn’t that hard
But you do have to get off your ass and turn off the tube and read.
We’ve known for well over 150 years the concept of vaccination is a fraud concept.
And the criminals that pose as our elected officials are in on the take and are raking in millions, and will NEVER stop the madness that is called vaccination.
And neither will doctors who are being PAID handsomely for jabbing and lying to their trusting patients.
If you’ve been jabbed then your death will be influenced by and/or directly caused by said jab.
People should quit thinking it’s coincidence. That’s propaganda talk.
And yet the populace of today (being dumbed down by design) have their heads buried in the sand and believe the corrupt media’s story of blaming these deaths on everything else under the sun except the obvious. What a pity.
And those “doctors” who are shilling for the medical cartel, the pharmafia and allopathic medicine should hang their heads in shame.
They know the truth, but have sold their soul to the company because their payment on their yacht, McMansion, and Jag is due.
Pitiful. Sickening, pathetic and pitiful.
And to those in the media, you drug pushing pieces of corporate shit: I hope you have a great answer come your judgment day.
I would love to add Dr. Paul Thomas to the list. A pediatrician who lost his license relatively recently for talking about how kids in his practice were healthier when they were not jabbed versus the jabbed kids.
https://rumble.com/v23e5lw-vaxxed-vs-unvaxxed-dr.-paul-thomas-and-dr.-james-lyons-weiler-put-cdc-vacci.html
https://www.amazon.com/Vaccine-Friendly-Plan-Effective-Health-Pregnancy/dp/1101884231/ref=sr_1_3?crid=31LYG7077P5OJ&keywords=Dr.+Paul+Thomas&qid=1683045207&sprefix=dr.+paul+thomas%2Caps%2C125&sr=8-3
I don't know you music man but I love you.
Here too.
VACCINATIONS?
https://ia601302.us.archive.org/12/items/MurderByInjection.EustaceMullins/Murder%20by%20Injection.%20Eustace%20Mullins.pdf
Great work Norm, well massaged statistics are a liars best friend!
The statistics are not even massaged. It's straight fraud. The people vaccinated less than 3 weeks previously were counted as vaccinated when the total number of vaccinated was reported, but counted as unvaccinated when an infection showed up. This is not "massaging". It's straight fraud.
For the U.S., tack on a bit of Healthy User Bias, and the illusory VE can indeed reach over 90%.
Nicely done, Norman.
Of course, for the actual covid injections as opposed to placebo, the illusion gets an additional “booster” (sorry but couldn’t resist) by virtue of the increased propensity of the injected to become infected during the period when they then become classed as unvaccinated.
And there’s a double booster if that infection then reduces the propensity to become infected later - once classed as vaccinated.
EXCELLENT WORK. I first pointed out that the delay tactic lead to amplified efficacy right after the first clinical trials. Including the patients during that time led to 75% efficacy, not 95%. The trials were fraud. Period. I want to interview you both on Unbreaking Science, please email executiveproducer@unbreakingscience.com
OK - will email
Please do! So many would love to see/hear this conversation!
Prof NF, May I suggest you get in touch with Neil Oliver again - he fears no one and if the interview happens that will be a test for OFCOM ......"bring it on".
He knows who I am and if he is brave enough to interview me I'm sure he will eventually ask!
I think GB News CEO and editors have done for Steyn, neutered Farage - not hard - and must have their sights on NO.....hope you get the gig before all of that; thanks for enlightening this avowed non statistician, once again.
Dr Jack, could you point me to the video or blog post re your "delay tactic lead..."
I'd like to add it to your page for completeness and historical purposes....
https://totalityofevidence.com/dr-james-lyons-weiler/
Thanks for this.
It’s looks clear now everything that the ONS produced should have had a warning attached that read something like ‘This data has not been properly analysed and verified, it can’t be used to draw conclusions about vaccines’.
Instead, we had the media producing articles making claims about how good the vaccines were, the articles included ‘The ONS says .....’ or ‘According to the ONS .......’
The 21 days classification also hid vaccine injuries in with covid data
Correct
Thanks so much for this work.!
Imagine if "journalists" had access to the internet and could find your work...
Even doctoring up the numbers as they did here the best they can supposedly prove was efficacy of 2 to 3 months waning afterwards , that is a simple business 101 “create a need and then fill that need for profits ”maybe you have to be on a lifelong booster to prevent infection absolute ridiculous of any understanding of vaccines efficacy but this again is not a vaccine it’s an injectable gene therapy.
A science of garbage in will get you garbage out!
Excellent summary and explanation.
1) It is important to clarify that the phenomenon of each groups' population sizes changes over time is only applicable to population level data. That aspect of this bias would not occur in a cohort study which would have both group sizes be fixed. I see some people citing your research erroneously in that regard. However other aspects of these biases would still be functioning. And also, in the event of acute negative efficacy, vaccine-caused covid cases would still be censored from the vaccine group (albeit not shifted into the unvaccinated group, as would happen in population level analysis).
2) It would be nice to do another simulation of a cohort study, since those are the ones people really cite which show the cyclical pattern of waning and boosting with new vaccines.
3) One aspect you made me realize just now is that not only do the vaccinated have higher natural immunity due to the requirement to be healthy before vaccination, but for a second reason as well. In the first two weeks after vaccination, you have a chance to develop natural immunity, without getting a counted case of covid! The unvaccinated are not afforded this opportunity. This issue becomes worse if vaccines have an acute negative efficacy. In population level data, this would in essence cause covid to be assigned to the unvaccinated, but the natural immunity be kept for the vaccinated! In a fixed-population-size cohort study, this would cause censoring of covid cases in the vaccinated, but would not "censor" the natural immunity they gained. But as stated, if infection rate is low, this bias may not matter a ton.
There was no doubting the scam very early on. As soon as they were classifying a Covid death as: anyone dying who tested positive 21 days prior, the writing was on the wall.
It is not surprising to me, people are evil and have orchestrated this atrocity. What has been surprising is how many people have been prepared to willingly, often vehemently, play a role in implementing it.
Thanks for the terrific analysis. It gives me both a tool to utilise in countering this madness, and, reassurance in the spark of decency remaining in humanity. Cheers
International Guidelines for Certification and Classification (Coding) of COVID-19 as Cause of Death. 20 April 2020
Section 4 bottom of page 8.
“Therefore, always apply these instructions, whether they can be considered medically correct or not.”
https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/classification/icd/covid-19/guidelines-cause-of-death-covid-19-20200420-en.pdf?sfvrsn=35fdd864_2&download=true
Robert Kennedy Jr explains the corrupt vaccine safety system -
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/members-only/vaccine-safety-project-video/
And if real-world effectiveness is not to your liking, you change the estimator. I noticed that there seems to be quite some nonchalant use of Cox regression going on (but "very recently vaccinated" is never considered as explanatory variable).
https://cm27874.substack.com/p/bivalent-intransparent-ambivalent
As you sort of acknowledge in your May 6 update, this spurious vaccine effectiveness ONLY results if you shift the infections by 2 weeks but not the number vaccinated/uvaccinated (i.e. denominators).
When both are shifted, the correct 0% VE results.
You state that "The answer is that, while those infected within 21 days are classified as unvaccined in observational trials, those who are not infected are generally treated as vaccinated" -- can you list even one vaccine effectiveness study in which this is the case?
The ONS VE study you link does not do this -- it defines vaccinated as >14d after shot, and uses a Cox Regression model using time-varying covariate for vaccine status (thus vaccine status, the denominators, change over time as well).
Most good VE studies use time-varying vaccination status and measure infection rate not as simple "# vaccinated who were infected/# vaccinated", but use person-years to model differing amount of time in each vaccine status for each individual. These studies are exempt from the spurious effect you illustrate here no matter what time frame after shot they use for "fully vaccinated", since both events and time at risk (denominator) are matching.
The only studies affected by this phenomenon you point out are those that use mismatched time frames for events and denominators. I'm not aware of any out of the many dozens of VE studies that have been published so far (perhaps over 100 by now) -- are you aware of any and if so, link them here?
Or are you just pointing out a hypothetical phenomenon, but not sure whether it really impacts any of the real VE studies that have been published to date?
I'd really appreciate Normans's response to these questions. I noticed you also asked these questions on Mathew Crawford's article about this very topic.
https://wherearethenumbers.substack.com/p/the-very-best-of-cheap-trick
Dear Professor Fenton, could you please respond to Professor Morris on these points? Is it true there are no actual VE studies that perpetrate the gross fraud you're purporting to expose here?
Prof Martin Neil, Twitter, 29 July 2023:
"How widespread is the (mal)practice of miscategorising vaccination status?
We have uncovered twenty-five papers and official reports where vaccination status was deliberately. miscategorised.”
https://twitter.com/MartinNeil9/status/1685356144246616064
Thanks for taking the time to point us towards these indirect responses. Still hoping for a direct response at some stage.
I suppose none of the listed papers uses the cheap tricks Prof. Fenton uses in his analysis.