They are not doing the job we think they are being paid for. They are doing another job that is against public interest and serves big government/business fascism.
They Know don't they....Just NOT allowed to up to date the data by the higher up the chain evil doers. Everyone ( maybe 95% ) of them are Aiding & abetting to this catastrophe.
Imagine a world where the majority of the population is coerced into participating in a lottery which granted the participants society-wide access in exchange for a very small chance that they would be severely injured or die. Government paid the lottery creators a small fee for every participant, a portion of which was then recycled back into the pockets of the authorities/“experts” in government and the private sector. The experts only got paid if they encouraged/coerced/bullied people to participate in this lottery, and therefore over 90% advocated for lottery participation. The authorities also only get paid if they ignore any reports of harm from the lottery. That’s where we are.
Same here in America as Brownstone reported.. nothing to see who needs long term tracking.. besides CDC does say thanks for participating on their site where adverse events would be!!
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) V-safe website quietly stopped collecting adverse event reports with no reason or explanation. The V-safe website simply states: “Thank you for your participation. Data collection for COVID-19 vaccines concluded on June 30, 2023.” If you go there today, V-safe directs users to the FDA’s VAERS website for adverse event reporting, even though officials continually derided VAERS as “passive” and “unverified.”
Aug 28, 2023·edited Aug 28, 2023Liked by Norman Fenton
They've been doing this "smoke and mirrors" act from the start, presumably expecting that people wouldn't notice or be informed enough to blow the whistle on their antics, but thanks to you Norman, and Martin, and of course others who close followers of the story will know already, the game is up. So as you rightly said, the last resort (of the losing side) is to say "I'm not playing anymore, I'm taking my ball home". Well, the ONS can play or not play, but either way we know who won the game
Aug 29, 2023·edited Aug 29, 2023Liked by Norman Fenton
CDC has of course also stopped receiving Covid "vaccine" AE data into its V-Safe system.
Both of these actions (CDC and ONS) would be strange and irregular under any circumstances, but particularly so in the case of mRNA "vaccines" with already well-documented diverse AE issues reasonably hanging over them and, being an entirely novel technology, longer-term AEs are as yet unknown, although we do have some pointers, particularly in the areas of CV, neurological, fertlity and cancer.
You would think, therefore, that Governments would want to obtain and analyse any and all data over the long term in the interests of Public Health. The opposite appears to be the case. Why?
In recent Australian Senate hearings, Pfizer has gone out of its way, even in its written follow-up, NOT to answer the question "Do you understand the mechanism causing reported cases of vaccine-related myocarditis and pericarditis, yes or no?" I suspect, based on reported information, that the retisence on this and other AE issues is that such AEs (and the mechanisms by which they occcur, including autoimmune responses) are not restricted to Covid "vaccines" but will apply to ALL mRNA vaccines, which Big Pharma sees as "the future" for multiple "vaccines", in part perhaps because they cost virtually nothing to manufacture in bulk, so generate extremely high profit margins, especially in the US where there is no pricing constraint.
Even more worrying the latest ONS data appears to be "missing" around 7,000 all cause deaths for 2023. The deaths are missing disproportionately from the younger age group which is where other data shows the higher excess deaths are occurring.
It takes many many years to build a good reputation but this bunch of jokers have managed to not only discredit their own department but also the pharmaceutical industry and most importantly the NHS.
In Germany, the RKI ended the performance not with a whimper but with a bang ("Abschlussbericht"). In a hilarious pseudo-academic paper, they calibrated around 100 variables to a few hundred values (basically, weekly case rates for 16 states), and praised themselves for the efficacy of all the measures taken. I may write about the paper, but in German (I want to be able to appropriately rant).
They are not doing the job we think they are being paid for. They are doing another job that is against public interest and serves big government/business fascism.
Why do we have to fund them with tax dollars?
At a glance I would say it simply confirms what we have known for a long time, to wit, they’re a bunch of liars
"Murder is highly illegal and is punished severely, unless it is done by armies, governments and large international corporations"
Voltaire
They Know don't they....Just NOT allowed to up to date the data by the higher up the chain evil doers. Everyone ( maybe 95% ) of them are Aiding & abetting to this catastrophe.
Imagine a world where the majority of the population is coerced into participating in a lottery which granted the participants society-wide access in exchange for a very small chance that they would be severely injured or die. Government paid the lottery creators a small fee for every participant, a portion of which was then recycled back into the pockets of the authorities/“experts” in government and the private sector. The experts only got paid if they encouraged/coerced/bullied people to participate in this lottery, and therefore over 90% advocated for lottery participation. The authorities also only get paid if they ignore any reports of harm from the lottery. That’s where we are.
Same here in America as Brownstone reported.. nothing to see who needs long term tracking.. besides CDC does say thanks for participating on their site where adverse events would be!!
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) V-safe website quietly stopped collecting adverse event reports with no reason or explanation. The V-safe website simply states: “Thank you for your participation. Data collection for COVID-19 vaccines concluded on June 30, 2023.” If you go there today, V-safe directs users to the FDA’s VAERS website for adverse event reporting, even though officials continually derided VAERS as “passive” and “unverified.”
https://brownstone.org/articles/cdc-refusing-new-covid-vaccine-adverse-event-reports/
They've been doing this "smoke and mirrors" act from the start, presumably expecting that people wouldn't notice or be informed enough to blow the whistle on their antics, but thanks to you Norman, and Martin, and of course others who close followers of the story will know already, the game is up. So as you rightly said, the last resort (of the losing side) is to say "I'm not playing anymore, I'm taking my ball home". Well, the ONS can play or not play, but either way we know who won the game
I find it hard to believe someone has not come forward as a whistleblower. Surely there is at least one person in the ONS with integrity.
This appears a severe dereliction of duty. They need to produce reliable data for deaths in vaccinated and unvaccinated people.
Is the raw data available?
Which means that once caught out in a lie, better confess; otherwise it’s downhill from then on.
CDC has of course also stopped receiving Covid "vaccine" AE data into its V-Safe system.
Both of these actions (CDC and ONS) would be strange and irregular under any circumstances, but particularly so in the case of mRNA "vaccines" with already well-documented diverse AE issues reasonably hanging over them and, being an entirely novel technology, longer-term AEs are as yet unknown, although we do have some pointers, particularly in the areas of CV, neurological, fertlity and cancer.
You would think, therefore, that Governments would want to obtain and analyse any and all data over the long term in the interests of Public Health. The opposite appears to be the case. Why?
In recent Australian Senate hearings, Pfizer has gone out of its way, even in its written follow-up, NOT to answer the question "Do you understand the mechanism causing reported cases of vaccine-related myocarditis and pericarditis, yes or no?" I suspect, based on reported information, that the retisence on this and other AE issues is that such AEs (and the mechanisms by which they occcur, including autoimmune responses) are not restricted to Covid "vaccines" but will apply to ALL mRNA vaccines, which Big Pharma sees as "the future" for multiple "vaccines", in part perhaps because they cost virtually nothing to manufacture in bulk, so generate extremely high profit margins, especially in the US where there is no pricing constraint.
Even more worrying the latest ONS data appears to be "missing" around 7,000 all cause deaths for 2023. The deaths are missing disproportionately from the younger age group which is where other data shows the higher excess deaths are occurring.
SUM of Count of Deaths Year
Age group 2022 2023 Difference % Difference
18-39 3612 1906 -1706 -47%
40-49 5067 3758 -1309 -26%
50-59 13144. 11110 -2034 -15%
60-69 24674 23710 -964 -4%
70-79 51229 50325 -904 -2%
80-89 76019 76948 929 1%
90+ 49260 50778 1518 3%
Grand Total. 223005 218535 -4470 -2%
Jan-May Deaths All causes
Table 5 ONS Deaths by vaccination status, England
https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/datasets/deathsbyvaccinationstatusengland
It takes many many years to build a good reputation but this bunch of jokers have managed to not only discredit their own department but also the pharmaceutical industry and most importantly the NHS.
A couple of quick comments
1. They are doing their jobs, which is to coverup the truth.
2. Peasant's don't need no stinkin' data
3. The Asch Conformity experiment is alive and well. To learn more: "https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2022/04/this_scary_experiment_explains_two_years_of_covid_hell.html"
One word. WOW!
This behaviour by ONS says it all and more.
"Like a spoilt brat while losing the ONS decide to take their ball away and stop the game"
Exactly.
In Germany, the RKI ended the performance not with a whimper but with a bang ("Abschlussbericht"). In a hilarious pseudo-academic paper, they calibrated around 100 variables to a few hundred values (basically, weekly case rates for 16 states), and praised themselves for the efficacy of all the measures taken. I may write about the paper, but in German (I want to be able to appropriately rant).
https://www.rki.de/DE/Content/InfAZ/N/Neuartiges_Coronavirus/Projekte_RKI/StopptCOVID-Bericht.pdf?__blob=publicationFile