152 Comments
Jul 29, 2023Liked by Martin Neil

It’s not a cheap trick, it’s a $100 billion per year trick.

https://www.statista.com/statistics/1104110/top-global-pharma-companies-by-vaccine-revenue/

There would be no vaccine industry without this trick.

Expand full comment
Jul 29, 2023Liked by Norman Fenton

I'm bookmarking this post. This is the key to demonstrating that Covid vaccine efficacy is an illusion and I thank you for finding examples of the mis-categorisation.

Expand full comment

So by definition all vaccine injuries falling within 1 or 2 or 3 weeks of the jab are not caused by the vaccine. Fair dinkum.

Expand full comment
Jul 30, 2023Liked by Norman Fenton

As I mentioned on a couple of other Substacks this cheap trick has a proud history going back to Pasteur who used a 14 day cut-off to avoid the embarrassment of having to explain why sickness increased immediately after administration of his wonder vax. And it’s debunking has an almost equally long history (there were honest, intelligent people questioning the narrative in those days too). So this is actually a 200-year-old debate. It takes quite a while, it would seem, to eliminate myths and fraud in the world of medicine. The cholesterol fraud is only 70 years old, so a way to go before that’s undone.

Expand full comment
Jul 29, 2023Liked by Martin Neil, Norman Fenton

I've lost count of how many published papers I have read concerning vaccine efficiency, but it is multiple dozens. I have yet to find one that didn't employ this "trick."

Thanks for documenting this.

Expand full comment

Way to keep a record of the data crimes, guys!

It's good to build up a rap sheet on the twisted activities of these hucksters.

Expand full comment
Jul 29, 2023Liked by Martin Neil, Norman Fenton

Enron accounting skills for science & Pharma funding!

Expand full comment

Great post- thank you and really helpful to have all these studies listed in one place. Shocking how many studies didn't even define the terms vaccinated and unvaccinated. Also shocking that each study seems to have different definitions for the two terms so that no two studies are alike.

Expand full comment
Jul 29, 2023Liked by Martin Neil, Norman Fenton

Prolific.....'their' goalposts are very flexible. How is the virus being detected in respiratory airways if it hasn't been identified as SARS-COV-2, or purified.? Is what is being detected in the respiratory systems definitively SARS-COV-2 or a 'flu-like illness? Not so much 'Where Are The Numbers' as 'Of What Are The(se) Numbers'? Well, maybe this is a sub section of the numbers work you have undertaken.

'They' can't really argue with 'numbers', or shouldn't, just as they are currently and repeatedly misrepresenting numbers 'celsius'. But, these faux fiery temperatures are being called out as fakes.

I applaud the WATN team because numbers are the way to show these medical (and climate) charlatans up.

Expand full comment
Jul 30, 2023Liked by Martin Neil

Yes this is a common, entirely disingenuous (at best!) practice. Either you had the jab (in which case you ARE vaccinated) or you didn't. Thay want to pretend it's possible to be "a little bit pregnant"?

Expand full comment
Jul 29, 2023Liked by Norman Fenton

Just such an intentional statistical manipulation by the people who are supposedly trying to protect us. Nauseating.

Expand full comment
Jul 31, 2023·edited Jul 31, 2023Liked by Martin Neil, Norman Fenton

Can you imagine the amount of information we as a species would have about this shot had the world just created a category of its own for those who were in the 14 or 21 day post vaccine window? If we would not have assigned them to either group but actually just tracked them? We had one chance to gather this info. Thai was at a time when our governments were apparently so “on it” that they did contact tracing!! Which was no small feat…. How easy would it have been comparatively? So easy and yet now we will never know. This was a crime against humanity.

Expand full comment

I live in San Diego County, and noticed that there was some funny business going on with their vaccine data when I saw that their data showed that 103.8% of the 65+ age group were vaccinated. By overstating the percentage of 65+ age group who were vaccinated they were also overstating the vaccine effectiveness. And, since most of the deaths occurred in this age group, this had a significant impact. I wrote about it a few months ago here: https://michaelfons.substack.com/p/san-diego-county-is-overstating-the

Expand full comment

Thank you the work that went into this important piece of evidence in the plandemic.

Expand full comment
Jul 30, 2023Liked by Norman Fenton

Norman and Martin, thank you for this confirmation of the depth of the data corruption. I have just listened to Michael Shellenberger and Bret Weinstein on the Dark Horse Podcast, where both refer to the importance of your revelations. Bret states:

“There may be an awakening, the deeper, you dig. Norman Fenton may be the very clear, early indication that something may be wrong in this Covid. space.”

It’s a great feeling to think that I have contributed in some tiny financial way to exposing this global crime.

Expand full comment
Jul 29, 2023Liked by Martin Neil

Tedious work. Thank you for slogging through it.

Expand full comment