Thanks. It is encouraging. They are hiding behind the healthy vaccine effect whilst providing zero evidence to support this assumption. And in tandem admitting that given their data is utter crap. So why did they bother with such a waste of taxpayer money?
We dont recieve any help from students or other academics I'm afraid. As Bret Weistein said 'academia selects for cowardice'. And on the current climate no one listens never mind step forward.
I recommend you read v2 of our paper and look at the appendix on the healthy vaxx effect. We argue that jab rates amongst the moribund were likely to be very high. An unhealthy vaccine effect if you will.
Next read the section dealing with ethnic participation rates. They were high, much higher the some assume. Also pakistani heritage etc have a better life expectancy than we've been actually been told.
We use evidence to support our assertions but are happy to be contradicted by better explanations supported by good evidence. We await the ONS doing this. They have the resources. We knock our stuff out on a part time basis with zero funding.
One point to consider on the ONS skewering by media outlets is the misleading use of 'person years', which has become the pharmaceutical industry's new strawman for death counts, which they're currently using to obscure the actual mortality rates.
I had a pro-vaccine shill attack me with the ONS dataset quoting another Substack where they massage the numbers to make vaccinated mortality rates seem lower (via the use of 'person years') when, if you look at the analysis I performed, it shows 5 vaccinated died for every 1 unvaccinated death, with unvaccinated all cause deaths literally dropping off a cliff (falling from 52k to 1-2k, compared to the continual 20k-30k in vaccinated):
So even with the ONS data skewering, it still contradicts their assessment that the vaccines are beneficial. The fact ONS have stopped publishing since May 2022 shows they know it makes the vaccines look bad.
Essential reporting, and in such brevity. Though the authorities have already more than sufficiently discredited themselves globally, and though the struggle for public opinion is tiresome, further evidence like this remains of crucial importance.
Thank you for fighting the good fight up in Albion.
Thank you so much. This was greatly needed. Now, if those responsible for pushing the narrative with this data will retract it - publicly - then perhaps more people will wake up to what has been done on both sides of the pond.
Consider people in care homes vaccinated by flying cadres of vaccinations, with tight schedules and lots of work to do.
How many care homes at that time would have been careful enough to check for and obtain medical power of attorney for each and every patient?
So it is maybe plausible that people were vaccinated, died and given no paperwork existed with PoA permission were then retrospectively recategorised after the event to reduce legal risk
They are reluctant to admit having blood on their hands, not just because of their precious egos, but because it opens them up to massive legal consequences.
I’m sure a lot collaborators or at least those complicit in the Third Reich took denials of wrongdoing to their graves.
Father forgive them for they know not what they do.
If the healthy vaccinee effect explains the low deaths in the vaccinated in the first few weeks after vaccination then as many have pointed out it can't also be true that the non-covid mortality for example in the 70-79 age group suddenly increases in the unvaccinated in March 2021 just after first doses have occurred, to 5X the rate of the ever vaccinated rate. But that's what the ONS dataset at face value says. So it has to be wrong in some other way as this directly contradicts the healthy vaccinee hypothesis.. But this isn't covered in the UK statistics regulator reply.
Note also that ONS sneaked in a huge change in unvaccinated numbers in the 70-79 age group in particular between their deaths to 31st October 2021 and deaths to December 2021 datasets, but never explained they had done this. So it shows they have mis-categorised unvaccinated in the past even looking at the official data and changes.
For example the average unvaccinated 70-79 year old population in March 2021 in the ONS PHDA dataset of deaths to 31st October 2021 publication was 327,758 (=27,837 x 365/31) but this has now reduced to 171,316 (= 14,554 x 365/31) in the latest ONS to May 2022 publication. But these should essentially be the same unvaccinated people in these two datasets. So roughly for every 2 70-79 unvaccinated in the to 31st October publication at March 2021 (around the time of first vaccinations) the ONS have just moved one of those two into the vaccinated group in the subsequent publications. If you look at the total numbers in their dataset you can see that the total 70-79 population at March 2021 stays about the same while this change happens so it's a clear reallocation. of unvaccinated to vaccinated.
I contacted ONS about the change in March 2021 in the 70-79 age group between the to October 2021 and to December 2021 reports at the time (I emailed on 9th February 2022), to ask them to explain why such a major revision took place, but they've never responded to my email.
So the ONS have already in front of our eyes corrected a huge mis-allocation of the unvaccinated population. What other mis-allocations haven't they corrected for, and what other mis-allocations of deaths are occurring?
UK Statistics Regulator agrees with our recommendation to ignore any claims of vaccine safety based on ONS deaths by vaccination status data
Hi Gary
Thanks. It is encouraging. They are hiding behind the healthy vaccine effect whilst providing zero evidence to support this assumption. And in tandem admitting that given their data is utter crap. So why did they bother with such a waste of taxpayer money?
We dont recieve any help from students or other academics I'm afraid. As Bret Weistein said 'academia selects for cowardice'. And on the current climate no one listens never mind step forward.
Martin
I recommend you read v2 of our paper and look at the appendix on the healthy vaxx effect. We argue that jab rates amongst the moribund were likely to be very high. An unhealthy vaccine effect if you will.
Next read the section dealing with ethnic participation rates. They were high, much higher the some assume. Also pakistani heritage etc have a better life expectancy than we've been actually been told.
We use evidence to support our assertions but are happy to be contradicted by better explanations supported by good evidence. We await the ONS doing this. They have the resources. We knock our stuff out on a part time basis with zero funding.
David vs Goliath. David won.
Martin
Great work.. thank you..
They said to rely on the UKHSA? That’s hilarious given the UKHSA stopped reporting updated statistics last spring/summer. 🤦♂️
Thanks for dealing responsibly and competently with the data, regardless of the prestige of the organisation. Much appreciated.
One point to consider on the ONS skewering by media outlets is the misleading use of 'person years', which has become the pharmaceutical industry's new strawman for death counts, which they're currently using to obscure the actual mortality rates.
I had a pro-vaccine shill attack me with the ONS dataset quoting another Substack where they massage the numbers to make vaccinated mortality rates seem lower (via the use of 'person years') when, if you look at the analysis I performed, it shows 5 vaccinated died for every 1 unvaccinated death, with unvaccinated all cause deaths literally dropping off a cliff (falling from 52k to 1-2k, compared to the continual 20k-30k in vaccinated):
https://thedailybeagle.substack.com/p/moderna-shill-accidentally-confirms
So even with the ONS data skewering, it still contradicts their assessment that the vaccines are beneficial. The fact ONS have stopped publishing since May 2022 shows they know it makes the vaccines look bad.
Essential reporting, and in such brevity. Though the authorities have already more than sufficiently discredited themselves globally, and though the struggle for public opinion is tiresome, further evidence like this remains of crucial importance.
Thank you for fighting the good fight up in Albion.
Thank you so much. This was greatly needed. Now, if those responsible for pushing the narrative with this data will retract it - publicly - then perhaps more people will wake up to what has been done on both sides of the pond.
Consider people in care homes vaccinated by flying cadres of vaccinations, with tight schedules and lots of work to do.
How many care homes at that time would have been careful enough to check for and obtain medical power of attorney for each and every patient?
So it is maybe plausible that people were vaccinated, died and given no paperwork existed with PoA permission were then retrospectively recategorised after the event to reduce legal risk
Why has nobody made a FOIA request for the current ONS data by vaccination status and for their definition of what "unvaccinated" includes?
John Campbell should do a video about this.
Great thanks
Amazing work. Thank you. Sharing with everyone I know!
They are reluctant to admit having blood on their hands, not just because of their precious egos, but because it opens them up to massive legal consequences.
I’m sure a lot collaborators or at least those complicit in the Third Reich took denials of wrongdoing to their graves.
Father forgive them for they know not what they do.
The Narrative (tm) was always fraudulent, those who we're watching closely knew already early in 2020.
The faster the narrative crumbles, the better for humanity.
BUT, without accountability and the removal of those guilty of fraud and manipulation, it will all be for naught
Thank you for all your work here!
If the healthy vaccinee effect explains the low deaths in the vaccinated in the first few weeks after vaccination then as many have pointed out it can't also be true that the non-covid mortality for example in the 70-79 age group suddenly increases in the unvaccinated in March 2021 just after first doses have occurred, to 5X the rate of the ever vaccinated rate. But that's what the ONS dataset at face value says. So it has to be wrong in some other way as this directly contradicts the healthy vaccinee hypothesis.. But this isn't covered in the UK statistics regulator reply.
Note also that ONS sneaked in a huge change in unvaccinated numbers in the 70-79 age group in particular between their deaths to 31st October 2021 and deaths to December 2021 datasets, but never explained they had done this. So it shows they have mis-categorised unvaccinated in the past even looking at the official data and changes.
For example the average unvaccinated 70-79 year old population in March 2021 in the ONS PHDA dataset of deaths to 31st October 2021 publication was 327,758 (=27,837 x 365/31) but this has now reduced to 171,316 (= 14,554 x 365/31) in the latest ONS to May 2022 publication. But these should essentially be the same unvaccinated people in these two datasets. So roughly for every 2 70-79 unvaccinated in the to 31st October publication at March 2021 (around the time of first vaccinations) the ONS have just moved one of those two into the vaccinated group in the subsequent publications. If you look at the total numbers in their dataset you can see that the total 70-79 population at March 2021 stays about the same while this change happens so it's a clear reallocation. of unvaccinated to vaccinated.
I contacted ONS about the change in March 2021 in the 70-79 age group between the to October 2021 and to December 2021 reports at the time (I emailed on 9th February 2022), to ask them to explain why such a major revision took place, but they've never responded to my email.
So the ONS have already in front of our eyes corrected a huge mis-allocation of the unvaccinated population. What other mis-allocations haven't they corrected for, and what other mis-allocations of deaths are occurring?