The FDA are liars. It has been clear for over 2 years that the shots are unnecessary in children, ineffective in any case, and very, very dangerous. It is not possible to explain their malfeasance as incompetence.
(in the full-length video the transcript starts at 8:58)
TRANSCRIPT
DR. CHRIS SHOEMAKER: I'm proud of my last name but I'm also proud of the fact that almost all of my patients and almost all of the mothers and fathers of my patients, you know, call me Dr. Chris. So I can be called either, there are my two names, Chris is my first name, Shoemaker is my last name, and it's a real honor to be here with everybody.
Well, ah, in the very near future I'd like to ask a wonderful man to come forward and stand with me. His name is Dan Hartman. He's here in the crowd. I would welcome him coming up to be with me in the next couple of minutes or seconds. And it is at this time that we will put a face to the sadness of what vaccine injury is.
Vaccine injury, when given to people who don't need it, and no one under the age of 18 needed this shot, no one. And they were all likely to have bad things happen because their immune system is so strong at that age. That's the reason that Denmark has canceled the shot for the future. If this dear gentleman and family had been living in Denmark, to be honest, his son would be alive because there is no mandating of the shot for children in Denmark. They could get them, but they were not mandated for activities, social, physical education or otherwise.
Smart people other there in Denmark. Morons over here in Canada. Morons! Who don't know that you should not vaccinate babies and children.
[clapping]
And I pass the microphone to my dear friend Dan Hartman. God bless you, Dan.
DAN HARTMAN: Thank you, Doctor Chris.
DR. CHRIS SHOEMAKER: Great honor. [inaudible]
DAN HARTMAN: My boy loved hockey. It was his whole life. He was playing ever since he was a little kid. It's all he ever thought about. It was his love and passion. To keep playing hockey, he had to get a vaccine. Sean's biggest fear in life was needles. He was terrified of them. And if he would have had the choice, he wouldn't have taken a needle.
On August 25th, he got vaccinated. On August 29th he went to the hospital, to emergency. He had brown circles around his eyes, he was vomiting, had a very sore shoulder, and a rash. And the doctor sent him home with the medical equivalent of Advil. He didn't do a d-dimer test,* he didn't do a tropanin test.** I filed a complaint against this doctor with the CPSO*** for not doing his job. Two little blood tests that he could have done that might have saved my son's life. They found him not guilty.
So he went to hockey on August, on September 26th. Went to play hockey with his friends. On the morning of September 27th he was, he was found dead on the floor beside his bed. My perfectly healthy son, who had no underlying conditions, was gone.
They did an autopsy and the cause of death was unascertained. Sorry, we don't know why he died.
I want to know why my son isn't here. He was perfectly healthy. There was nothing wrong with him. He faced his biggest fear, which was needles, and it took his life. And I want someone to tell me the damned truth, why my son isn't alive anymore.
This man next to me has been a doctor for over 45 years, he's worked in emergency for 25 years, so when you needed his help, you went and saw a man like this. You trusted him. So now the world needs to trust what he's saying because he's just trying to help. And that's what a doctor does.
My days are absolute torture now. I just cry 15 times a day. And it's hard to even exist. I want the truth about these vaccines.
Every other country in the world is admitting to vaccine deaths. Not Canada. I haven't heard of one.
Is that what we're going to do? We're just going to pretend it's not killing anybody? Really?
If someone could say, I'm sorry, Mr. Hartman, your son died from the vaccine, then I can grieve my son. But not until that day.
Thank you, doctor.
[clapping]
DR. CHRIS SHOEMAKER [taking the microphone]: Based on the medical history, I can say to you, your son was killed by the vaccine. Immediate symptoms within 48 hours of the shot, including symptoms of thrombosis or hemolysis, the fact that marks under the yes, something was going on with his hematologic system and the only thing that had happened was 48 hours before, he got a toxic shot.
I'm so sorry. We're here with you and with all the vaccine injured. Love to you all.
* "A D-dimer test is a simple blood test that can help your healthcare provider determine if you may have a blood clotting condition. If you have a high level of D-dimer in your blood, your provider may have you undergo further blood tests and/or imaging procedures to determine a diagnosis."
**"A troponin test looks for certain types of the protein troponin, in your bloodstream. Those types of troponin only occur in heart muscle cells and only enter your blood because of heart muscle damage. That makes troponin invaluable in diagnosing heart attacks and other heart-related problems." See: https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diagnostics/22770-troponin-test
STEVE BANNON: How can we possibly have the FDA approving—and they seem like they're obsessed— to approve the vaccinations, the vaccines for the babies. Walk me through this. I don't understand how this could happen given all the information that's come out now, and I particularly don't understand the obsession, and it is an obsession they have, to get it into kids under five. Dr. Alexander.
DR. PAUL ALEXANDER: Hey Steve, once again, it's a real honor to be here. Look, let me get to the point. When we look at all of the data, we look at data out of Sweden, out of Germany, out of the UK, we look at data by Martin Makary Johns Hopkins, we look at all of the Nordic nations, we see that the risk of death in healthy children, young children, young infants even, is basically zero. In fact Sweden, Germany, and these places record no deaths in healthy children in this age group. Martin Makary's group Johns Hopkins showed us that, I want to be clear how I make this statement, in United States of America since the beginning of this pandemic, not one healthy child has gotten infected with covid and died.
In the United States of America, during covid, from day one to today, that's almost two and a half years, not one healthy child has gotten infected with covid and passed away. Period.
There is no data that Fauci, Francis Collins, Rochelle Walensky, anyone in the Biden administration, or anyone even in the prior Trump administration, has shown us. There weren't any child. This is reckless, this is dangerous what the FDA and CDC has done.
They have no data, Steve. And what they have done is, they are relying on trials and studies that are very suboptimal and methodologically flawed. They are deliberately undersize, in terms of the sample size being small, and they deliberately shorten the duration of followup. So you, the reader, don't realize that they cannot detect safety signals because the duration of followup is so short, the safety effects can't emerge. So what they are doing is deceiving and misleading the public. And they are using crazy procedures like immunobridging. They are not looking at the patient important outcomes that you as a parent, you as grandparents, need to know.
Does this vaccine, let me be clear, does the Pfizer Moderna vaccine cut the risk of hospitalization or death or ICU? Patient important hard outcomes. There is no study that Pfizer Moderna has done, none, as of this moment, to show that these vaccines are effective in reducing hospitalizations or death. What they have done is they've run studies on antibodies, which means nothing to us because antibodies are not a proxy for immunity. So right now we are being misguided and misled with this flawed, and I actually say fraudulent, studies.
What the FDA has done here and the CDC is wrong. And I want to go on record Steve by saying, this is the hill that parents must battle on. This is the hill that parents must be prepared, must prepared to wage their largest battle. No child should be given these vaccines. Absolutely none. There's no basis. Your child is at zero risk, statistical zero risk, of severe illness or death from covid. You stand up and you say no.
How Can these folks be described anything other than Heartless sinister monstrous bastards! Sorry Dr Fenton, how else can these folks be described when they know? If you know , They Know too.
Why would the FDA do this? Well, the study paper they release is a form of major damage control; it only talks about myocarditis rates (with obviously low figures). You can sense how rushed it is, as the conclusion is contradictory and makes no sense; evidence of harms is somehow proof of safety.
In contrast, The Daily Beagle article is significantly more damning - it includes the fatality rates for myocarditis, contrasted against the SARS-CoV-2 fatality rate for children, with a backdrop of evidence that mRNA shots don't prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection taken from Pfizer's own legal disclaimers.
The Daily Beagle research does have one limitation, but it means the FDA's position is actually worse: the myocarditis fatality rate is just the rate of death within the first year of getting myocarditis. Meaning the fatality rate from myocarditis is most likely higher than what The Daily Beagle reports.
Naturally, if the FDA were going to pick out of the two options, they're going to pick the option to gaslight the public by announcing myocarditis exists but insisting the harms prove it is somehow safe.
It reminds me of this quote from the Simpsons:
Mapple employee: "Sir, it's not even turned on yet."
Homer: "But it's glowing!"
Mapple employee: "The light confirms that it's off."
How you have the patience to reason about a thing so unreasonable as democide/ iatrogenocide is beyond me. And it's beyond the killers as well. I hear a great wailing, for all the children whose parents are slowly coming to the realization they have failed in their job to protect their children from murder.
Maybe now is a good time to recall how the paper on myocarditis in young boys post jab by Peter McCullough and Jessica Rose was pulled by a major science journal after a major pfsience journal put the pressure on them. Can't have the truth in print. Especially in the era of COVID.
This is very distressing. Does the FDA have no qualified, ethical, statisticians? The underlying premise of the FDA is to ensure safety and efficacy of products/drugs provided/dispensed to the American public—it is NOT to serve the interests of whatever administration is in place. A thorough bi-partisan investigation must be made.
Please see below my email to Australian Health Department Secretary Brendan Murphy, sent on 24 February 2021:
Professor Murphy
You recently assured Australians that the Pfizer and AstraZeneca vaccine products have "gone through the normal, full range of regulatory approvals for our vaccines...we have been able to do the full, safe, regulatory approval...we have not cut any corners" and "...we decided that to get the confidence of the people in Australia, because we had no community transmission, we were not going to do anything other than our full normal registration process", during an interview with Leigh Sales on the ABC's 7.30 program on 3 February 2021. (See copy of transcript attached.)
Your statements were in response to Leigh Sales' questions "...what is your message to any Australian who might be legitimately worried thinking, "This has happened all pretty quickly. I'm sort of worried. Is it going to be safe to have a vaccine? What is your official advice on that?" (My emphasis.)
Professor Murphy, I suggest your 'official advice' on this matter is misleading because in fact both the Pfizer and and AstraZeneca vaccine products have only been given 'provisional' approval by the TGA. This has not been made clear to the Australian public.
The TGA provisional approval statement for both the Pfizer COMIRNATY[1] and COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca[2] vaccine products states: (See copies attached.)
"Provisional approval of this vaccine is valid for two years and means it can now be legally supplied in Australia. The approval is subject to certain strict conditions, such as the requirement for (Pfizer/AstraZeneca) to continue providing information to the TGA on longer term efficacy and safety from ongoing clinical trials and post market assessment. (Pfizer COMIRNATY/COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca) has been shown to prevent COVID- 19 however it is not yet known whether it prevents transmission or asymptomatic disease." (My emphasis.)
Professor Murphy, I again suggest you have misled Australians about the TGA approval for the Pfizer and AstraZeneca vaccine products.
These vaccine products have not been fully approved, and it is not yet known whether they prevent transmission or asymptomatic disease.
The Pfizer and AstraZeneca vaccine products are provisionally approved for two years, and the TGA will be relying on manufacturer supplied data to judge the longer term efficacy and safety from ongoing clinical trials and post-market assessment. 'Post-market assessment' indicates people being vaccinated in the community are now part of the clinical trials assessing these vaccine products - are people being informed they are part of a vaccine clinical trial? Are these people giving their consent to being involved in a vaccine clinical trial with these provisionally approved vaccine products?
It's on the record I have brought this matter to your attention Professor Murphy, as witnessed by other members of the COVID-19 Vaccines and Treatments for Australia - Science and Industry Technical Advisory Group copied on this email.
This email will be forwarded to Prime Minister Scott Morrison, Health Minister Greg Hunt and other parties. Sincerely
Elizabeth Hart
Independent person investigating the over-use of vaccine products and conflicts of interest in vaccination policy
See this link to original email: COVID-19 vaccines are NOT fully approved by the TGA:
Yet another reason I am grateful to you, Professor Fenton, is the way that you've catalyzed my thinking on weaponized category error as foundational to statistical legerdemain.
Executive decisionmaking is utterly reliant on aggregated data extracted from accounting practice. Having encountered the suboptimal results of decisions based on categorical distortions of accounting data, over decades, I've wrestled with attempts to provide actionable illustrations of this paradigm, in order to improve the quality of reporting and the resulting management decisions.
The primary difficulty has been illustration of the way in which miscategorization at the level of basic recordkeeping constitutes inception of feedback loops that perpetuate distortion. Were it entirely mathematical, presentation would be straightforward, however challenging it may be to communicate the information to those with short attention spans.
I've been watching you ever more closely, because of your demonstrated ability to render data analysis meaningful across differentiated domains. I have few lasting disappointments regarding my educational path, but one of them is that I did not have or create an opportunity to become your student.
It's very kind of you and Professor Neil to share your knowledge so accessibly as you have here and in your other publications. The good that you do will live beyond the span of your earthly tenure.
Stunning. This will not stop until there are consequences - as in death - for the perpetrators. Thie people involved in this are anit-Humankind and are psychopaths. They cannot be rehabilaiated. Period.
Another criticism of this FDA "it's safe in kids!" retrospective study is that the prospective evidence which does exist (adult Israeli health care workers with 50%-plus increase in troponin levels from the jab) indicates the possibility of universal (100%) harm to high risk groups like teenage males aged 16-17. I write about this here:
The FDA are liars. It has been clear for over 2 years that the shots are unnecessary in children, ineffective in any case, and very, very dangerous. It is not possible to explain their malfeasance as incompetence.
Thank you for blogging on this.
The testimonies of post-jab heart damage in children are just piling up. Here's one I transcribed just the other day:
Dr. Chris Shoemaker and Dan Hartman in Honour of Sean Hartman
Filmed September 3, 2022, at a rally before a vigil march in Toronto, Canada
clip
https://drshoemakercovidtruth.com/hot-topics/
Full-length video from Free Speech Media
"No More Shots, Let's Follow Denmark's Lead! 09/03/22"
https://rumble.com/v1ijlnz-no-more-shots-lets-follow-denmarks-lead-090322.html
(in the full-length video the transcript starts at 8:58)
TRANSCRIPT
DR. CHRIS SHOEMAKER: I'm proud of my last name but I'm also proud of the fact that almost all of my patients and almost all of the mothers and fathers of my patients, you know, call me Dr. Chris. So I can be called either, there are my two names, Chris is my first name, Shoemaker is my last name, and it's a real honor to be here with everybody.
Well, ah, in the very near future I'd like to ask a wonderful man to come forward and stand with me. His name is Dan Hartman. He's here in the crowd. I would welcome him coming up to be with me in the next couple of minutes or seconds. And it is at this time that we will put a face to the sadness of what vaccine injury is.
Vaccine injury, when given to people who don't need it, and no one under the age of 18 needed this shot, no one. And they were all likely to have bad things happen because their immune system is so strong at that age. That's the reason that Denmark has canceled the shot for the future. If this dear gentleman and family had been living in Denmark, to be honest, his son would be alive because there is no mandating of the shot for children in Denmark. They could get them, but they were not mandated for activities, social, physical education or otherwise.
Smart people other there in Denmark. Morons over here in Canada. Morons! Who don't know that you should not vaccinate babies and children.
[clapping]
And I pass the microphone to my dear friend Dan Hartman. God bless you, Dan.
DAN HARTMAN: Thank you, Doctor Chris.
DR. CHRIS SHOEMAKER: Great honor. [inaudible]
DAN HARTMAN: My boy loved hockey. It was his whole life. He was playing ever since he was a little kid. It's all he ever thought about. It was his love and passion. To keep playing hockey, he had to get a vaccine. Sean's biggest fear in life was needles. He was terrified of them. And if he would have had the choice, he wouldn't have taken a needle.
On August 25th, he got vaccinated. On August 29th he went to the hospital, to emergency. He had brown circles around his eyes, he was vomiting, had a very sore shoulder, and a rash. And the doctor sent him home with the medical equivalent of Advil. He didn't do a d-dimer test,* he didn't do a tropanin test.** I filed a complaint against this doctor with the CPSO*** for not doing his job. Two little blood tests that he could have done that might have saved my son's life. They found him not guilty.
So he went to hockey on August, on September 26th. Went to play hockey with his friends. On the morning of September 27th he was, he was found dead on the floor beside his bed. My perfectly healthy son, who had no underlying conditions, was gone.
They did an autopsy and the cause of death was unascertained. Sorry, we don't know why he died.
I want to know why my son isn't here. He was perfectly healthy. There was nothing wrong with him. He faced his biggest fear, which was needles, and it took his life. And I want someone to tell me the damned truth, why my son isn't alive anymore.
This man next to me has been a doctor for over 45 years, he's worked in emergency for 25 years, so when you needed his help, you went and saw a man like this. You trusted him. So now the world needs to trust what he's saying because he's just trying to help. And that's what a doctor does.
My days are absolute torture now. I just cry 15 times a day. And it's hard to even exist. I want the truth about these vaccines.
Every other country in the world is admitting to vaccine deaths. Not Canada. I haven't heard of one.
Is that what we're going to do? We're just going to pretend it's not killing anybody? Really?
If someone could say, I'm sorry, Mr. Hartman, your son died from the vaccine, then I can grieve my son. But not until that day.
Thank you, doctor.
[clapping]
DR. CHRIS SHOEMAKER [taking the microphone]: Based on the medical history, I can say to you, your son was killed by the vaccine. Immediate symptoms within 48 hours of the shot, including symptoms of thrombosis or hemolysis, the fact that marks under the yes, something was going on with his hematologic system and the only thing that had happened was 48 hours before, he got a toxic shot.
I'm so sorry. We're here with you and with all the vaccine injured. Love to you all.
[clapping]
Thank you Dan.
5:33
[END]
# # #
TRANSCRIBER'S NOTES:
For more about Dr. Chris Shoemaker visit https://drshoemakercovidtruth.com/
* "A D-dimer test is a simple blood test that can help your healthcare provider determine if you may have a blood clotting condition. If you have a high level of D-dimer in your blood, your provider may have you undergo further blood tests and/or imaging procedures to determine a diagnosis."
See: https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diagnostics/22045-d-dimer-test
**"A troponin test looks for certain types of the protein troponin, in your bloodstream. Those types of troponin only occur in heart muscle cells and only enter your blood because of heart muscle damage. That makes troponin invaluable in diagnosing heart attacks and other heart-related problems." See: https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diagnostics/22770-troponin-test
*** College of Surgeons and Physicians of Ontario
https://www.cpso.on.ca/en
The folks are Lying Monsters. What a Tyranny. Not even showing Mercy to children.
Relatedly:
Dr. Paul Alexander: ‘Not One Healthy Child Has Of Died' In US Since Beginning Of Pandemic
Bannon's War Room
https://rumble.com/v18ue4m-dr.-alexander-not-one-healthy-child-has-of-died-in-us-since-beginning-of-pa.html
June 17, 2022
TRANSCRIPT - BRIEF EXCERPT
STEVE BANNON: How can we possibly have the FDA approving—and they seem like they're obsessed— to approve the vaccinations, the vaccines for the babies. Walk me through this. I don't understand how this could happen given all the information that's come out now, and I particularly don't understand the obsession, and it is an obsession they have, to get it into kids under five. Dr. Alexander.
DR. PAUL ALEXANDER: Hey Steve, once again, it's a real honor to be here. Look, let me get to the point. When we look at all of the data, we look at data out of Sweden, out of Germany, out of the UK, we look at data by Martin Makary Johns Hopkins, we look at all of the Nordic nations, we see that the risk of death in healthy children, young children, young infants even, is basically zero. In fact Sweden, Germany, and these places record no deaths in healthy children in this age group. Martin Makary's group Johns Hopkins showed us that, I want to be clear how I make this statement, in United States of America since the beginning of this pandemic, not one healthy child has gotten infected with covid and died.
[TRANSCRIBER'S NOTE: see <https://palexander.substack.com/p/makary-the-flimsy-evidence-behind>
which references this research]
I want to say it again so the public can hear it.
In the United States of America, during covid, from day one to today, that's almost two and a half years, not one healthy child has gotten infected with covid and passed away. Period.
There is no data that Fauci, Francis Collins, Rochelle Walensky, anyone in the Biden administration, or anyone even in the prior Trump administration, has shown us. There weren't any child. This is reckless, this is dangerous what the FDA and CDC has done.
They have no data, Steve. And what they have done is, they are relying on trials and studies that are very suboptimal and methodologically flawed. They are deliberately undersize, in terms of the sample size being small, and they deliberately shorten the duration of followup. So you, the reader, don't realize that they cannot detect safety signals because the duration of followup is so short, the safety effects can't emerge. So what they are doing is deceiving and misleading the public. And they are using crazy procedures like immunobridging. They are not looking at the patient important outcomes that you as a parent, you as grandparents, need to know.
Does this vaccine, let me be clear, does the Pfizer Moderna vaccine cut the risk of hospitalization or death or ICU? Patient important hard outcomes. There is no study that Pfizer Moderna has done, none, as of this moment, to show that these vaccines are effective in reducing hospitalizations or death. What they have done is they've run studies on antibodies, which means nothing to us because antibodies are not a proxy for immunity. So right now we are being misguided and misled with this flawed, and I actually say fraudulent, studies.
What the FDA has done here and the CDC is wrong. And I want to go on record Steve by saying, this is the hill that parents must battle on. This is the hill that parents must be prepared, must prepared to wage their largest battle. No child should be given these vaccines. Absolutely none. There's no basis. Your child is at zero risk, statistical zero risk, of severe illness or death from covid. You stand up and you say no.
# # #
TRANSCRIBER'S NOTES:
More info about Dr Paul Alexander at
https://www.drpaulalexander.com/
Dr. Alexander's Substack:
https://palexander.substack.com/
How Can these folks be described anything other than Heartless sinister monstrous bastards! Sorry Dr Fenton, how else can these folks be described when they know? If you know , They Know too.
The FDA totally screwed the pooch on this issue. So did just about everyone else for that matter. We are on our own until the house gets cleared out.
http://thedoctorsreport.net/2021/05/covid-19-review-we-crossed-the-line/
What Fenton & Co might find really eyebrow raising is the FDA released this study the *exact* same day The Daily Beagle published the article on why the mRNA shots harm children (May 22: https://thedailybeagle.substack.com/p/proving-the-mrna-shots-harm-children).
Why would the FDA do this? Well, the study paper they release is a form of major damage control; it only talks about myocarditis rates (with obviously low figures). You can sense how rushed it is, as the conclusion is contradictory and makes no sense; evidence of harms is somehow proof of safety.
In contrast, The Daily Beagle article is significantly more damning - it includes the fatality rates for myocarditis, contrasted against the SARS-CoV-2 fatality rate for children, with a backdrop of evidence that mRNA shots don't prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection taken from Pfizer's own legal disclaimers.
The Daily Beagle research does have one limitation, but it means the FDA's position is actually worse: the myocarditis fatality rate is just the rate of death within the first year of getting myocarditis. Meaning the fatality rate from myocarditis is most likely higher than what The Daily Beagle reports.
Naturally, if the FDA were going to pick out of the two options, they're going to pick the option to gaslight the public by announcing myocarditis exists but insisting the harms prove it is somehow safe.
It reminds me of this quote from the Simpsons:
Mapple employee: "Sir, it's not even turned on yet."
Homer: "But it's glowing!"
Mapple employee: "The light confirms that it's off."
How you have the patience to reason about a thing so unreasonable as democide/ iatrogenocide is beyond me. And it's beyond the killers as well. I hear a great wailing, for all the children whose parents are slowly coming to the realization they have failed in their job to protect their children from murder.
Maybe now is a good time to recall how the paper on myocarditis in young boys post jab by Peter McCullough and Jessica Rose was pulled by a major science journal after a major pfsience journal put the pressure on them. Can't have the truth in print. Especially in the era of COVID.
Why are children having Covid jabs - they’re not at risk of Covid!!!
Why is anyone being pressed, and even MANDATED, to have these worse than useless jabs?
These are UNNECESSARY medical interventions.
Why on earth has the medical ‘profession’ engaged in this gross exploitation of people around the world?
This is a medical ethics catastrophe of ginormous proportions.
This is very distressing. Does the FDA have no qualified, ethical, statisticians? The underlying premise of the FDA is to ensure safety and efficacy of products/drugs provided/dispensed to the American public—it is NOT to serve the interests of whatever administration is in place. A thorough bi-partisan investigation must be made.
They lie to our faces.
People were lied to about the vaccines…
Please see below my email to Australian Health Department Secretary Brendan Murphy, sent on 24 February 2021:
Professor Murphy
You recently assured Australians that the Pfizer and AstraZeneca vaccine products have "gone through the normal, full range of regulatory approvals for our vaccines...we have been able to do the full, safe, regulatory approval...we have not cut any corners" and "...we decided that to get the confidence of the people in Australia, because we had no community transmission, we were not going to do anything other than our full normal registration process", during an interview with Leigh Sales on the ABC's 7.30 program on 3 February 2021. (See copy of transcript attached.)
Your statements were in response to Leigh Sales' questions "...what is your message to any Australian who might be legitimately worried thinking, "This has happened all pretty quickly. I'm sort of worried. Is it going to be safe to have a vaccine? What is your official advice on that?" (My emphasis.)
Professor Murphy, I suggest your 'official advice' on this matter is misleading because in fact both the Pfizer and and AstraZeneca vaccine products have only been given 'provisional' approval by the TGA. This has not been made clear to the Australian public.
The TGA provisional approval statement for both the Pfizer COMIRNATY[1] and COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca[2] vaccine products states: (See copies attached.)
"Provisional approval of this vaccine is valid for two years and means it can now be legally supplied in Australia. The approval is subject to certain strict conditions, such as the requirement for (Pfizer/AstraZeneca) to continue providing information to the TGA on longer term efficacy and safety from ongoing clinical trials and post market assessment. (Pfizer COMIRNATY/COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca) has been shown to prevent COVID- 19 however it is not yet known whether it prevents transmission or asymptomatic disease." (My emphasis.)
Professor Murphy, I again suggest you have misled Australians about the TGA approval for the Pfizer and AstraZeneca vaccine products.
These vaccine products have not been fully approved, and it is not yet known whether they prevent transmission or asymptomatic disease.
The Pfizer and AstraZeneca vaccine products are provisionally approved for two years, and the TGA will be relying on manufacturer supplied data to judge the longer term efficacy and safety from ongoing clinical trials and post-market assessment. 'Post-market assessment' indicates people being vaccinated in the community are now part of the clinical trials assessing these vaccine products - are people being informed they are part of a vaccine clinical trial? Are these people giving their consent to being involved in a vaccine clinical trial with these provisionally approved vaccine products?
It's on the record I have brought this matter to your attention Professor Murphy, as witnessed by other members of the COVID-19 Vaccines and Treatments for Australia - Science and Industry Technical Advisory Group copied on this email.
This email will be forwarded to Prime Minister Scott Morrison, Health Minister Greg Hunt and other parties. Sincerely
Elizabeth Hart
Independent person investigating the over-use of vaccine products and conflicts of interest in vaccination policy
See this link to original email: COVID-19 vaccines are NOT fully approved by the TGA:
https://vaccinationispolitical.files.wordpress.com/2021/02/covid-19-vaccines-are-not-fully-approved-by-the-tga.pdf
Yet another reason I am grateful to you, Professor Fenton, is the way that you've catalyzed my thinking on weaponized category error as foundational to statistical legerdemain.
Executive decisionmaking is utterly reliant on aggregated data extracted from accounting practice. Having encountered the suboptimal results of decisions based on categorical distortions of accounting data, over decades, I've wrestled with attempts to provide actionable illustrations of this paradigm, in order to improve the quality of reporting and the resulting management decisions.
The primary difficulty has been illustration of the way in which miscategorization at the level of basic recordkeeping constitutes inception of feedback loops that perpetuate distortion. Were it entirely mathematical, presentation would be straightforward, however challenging it may be to communicate the information to those with short attention spans.
I've been watching you ever more closely, because of your demonstrated ability to render data analysis meaningful across differentiated domains. I have few lasting disappointments regarding my educational path, but one of them is that I did not have or create an opportunity to become your student.
It's very kind of you and Professor Neil to share your knowledge so accessibly as you have here and in your other publications. The good that you do will live beyond the span of your earthly tenure.
Stunning. This will not stop until there are consequences - as in death - for the perpetrators. Thie people involved in this are anit-Humankind and are psychopaths. They cannot be rehabilaiated. Period.
Another criticism of this FDA "it's safe in kids!" retrospective study is that the prospective evidence which does exist (adult Israeli health care workers with 50%-plus increase in troponin levels from the jab) indicates the possibility of universal (100%) harm to high risk groups like teenage males aged 16-17. I write about this here:
https://deepd1ve.substack.com/p/vrmi-vaccine-related-myocardial-injury