It might seem like a minor point but getting names of people attached to these documents rather than departments is vital as liability can then be attached to a person, this will cause a great deal of stress for those concerned, demand a name🤝👍
The utilitarian calculus is always applied by individuals. These individuals create and impose policies and procedures. Invariably, they seek the plausible deniability afforded by preserving their anonymity.
Anyone who has suffered the unfortunate necessity of clearing a building of an invasion of sewer rats will have observed that it's always the younger and less experienced rats that are initially found in the traps. Those who are relatively inexperienced with rodent behavior will assume that the first wave of full traps denotes success, and will end their rodent control initiative prematurely. The older and more cautious rats then remain free to repopulate in preparation for the next invasion.
The key to ridding one's home of disease-carrying rodents, lies in identifying and isolating the vermin with whom the invasion originated.
I keep feeling that were living in the Terry Gilliam film "Brazil"
As to the rats , they scurry about in the shadows and most people don't want to acknowledge there existence and all the people that took the product don't want to accept it was something other than they thought and choose not to see the rats scurrying around there feet.
Getting the furry ones out the sewers will not be easy ,they have an elaborate layer and have spent many years mastering there skills of subterfuge and deception.
On the contrary, one can be sure that they will not experience the least distress.
Everyone involved in the AZ debacle was honoured: Dames and Knights the lot of them.
So, can we really imagine that they will be facing up to their liability for the deaths and injuries in the future?
They have the stamp of full approval from HMG and the Establishment.
We must be realistic: justice will not be done, particularly as MP's - who theoretically could move to clean this up - are, almost universally, with a handful of honourable exceptions, so supine and conforming to the agenda.
I think the west is in for a terrible time my thoughts are find a country (state) with a small population, good climate and a high level of self sufficiency.Things will keep deteriorating as that's what the people in the shadows want👍
Aug 2, 2023·edited Aug 2, 2023Liked by Norman Fenton
"An astonishing 53% of all those in the study reported at least one ADR (POST VAX adverse drug reaction)!"
Us proud Conspiracy theorists will automatically realise that if 53% KNOW OF their Adverse Drug Reactions to the useless but potentially deadly injection' how many are not even aware?
How many have no idea they have unknowingly suffered an Adverse Reaction? Perhaps, delayed reaction, life-threatening or perhaps terminal! That could increase the number of ADRs to over 70%.
Then add the unknown (and therefore unreported) consequences for the unborn baby! It's totally insane and ridiculous to even consider taking these deadly jabs.
'NO LIABILITY' for Pfizer et al, tells us all we need to realise that this deadly depopulating crap must be avoided at all costs!
"Point 26 in the report states “Given the volume of pregnant women enrolled in the YCVM, we have an important future data source to support continuous and long term monitoring of pregnancy outcomes and will provide an update to the VBR in due course.” Yet the MHRA is still refusing to publish the results of these outcomes two years later,"
I think we all know that if the information was supporting their position it would have been quickly brought out and widekly broadcast. It must be really bad if they are taking this long to try and spin it.
The JCVI made the recommendation that pregnant women should receive Pfizer or Moderna along with the rest of the population in April 2021, based on the very dubious v-safe pregnancy register study carried out in the US. I presume that the MHRA pregnancy study was ongoing at the time, but was effectively made redundant (at least for Moderna and Pfizer vaccines) by the JCVI's decision in April. So did the MHRA actually bother to continue to collect data (their communications suggest they did) but was the outcome not favourable with respect to the decision already made by the government to promote the vaccine as 'safe and effective' for pregnant women?
Hi Norman did you ever get the pregnancy data? I strongly suspect the report was released in late Feb-early March 22 where there was a mysterious data entry surge, just like there was a mysterious surge in late June-July 21 at the time of the vaccine monitor report. The surge in March is alarming btw!
I read alot of the NHS info on the product at the time it was released and with regards to pregnancy ,it just kept saying that the data was not available or the trials not completed ,as to safe&effective it was a marketing slogan nothing more and some of the newspapers were "advertising" the shots as a "promotion" this was done in the telegraph but they changed the wording in later editions but I have seen this more than once.They new from day one that the product did not stop transmission and did not meet the criteria for a vaxcine it is an inoculation.
The article echoes this but differs in one extremely important aspect although it nails the point about what - and when - constitutes a spontaneous abortion.
So whilst the MHRA are still "hiding" the relevant data, does it really matter when you read through the above - IMHO, not a medical professional, NOT ONE JOT - the damning evidence has been "in plain sight" for 2+ years!!!
Any reliance placed upon the study from the US is highly suspect and very disturbing - but that would have been the case 2 + years ago. The UK NHS - in the form of individual NHS Trusts - has covered up the huge increase in foetal deaths where the Mother was jabbed - why else would these NHS Trusts have taken over the registration of the death, arranged for the cremation of the cadaver - destroying the evidence before an autopsy? It is a massive unreported scandal that continues - Cheryl, please contact John O'Looney to corroborate this if you have not done so already. Should anyone consider this a "conspiracy theory", JOL knows and MOH is NHS non clinical working in this sphere where highly educated (?) clinical Obs/GoBs medics are STILL insisting pregnant mothers have theses jabs - medical malpractice suits await if someone/some people have the balls to sue - the RC's and the medical trades unions are ignoring these trial data so no help there.
In case this is forgotten, Raine is the criminal who deliberately interfered in how UK medics could treat their patients by the - non - approval of IVM as an early treatment AV for CV19 sufferers; her quango actively participated in the confiscation by UK Border Force of IVM imported in to the UK by individuals; her corrupt management of an equally corrupt UK quango, heavily influenced sorry compromised by money from Bill Gates meant that because SHE did not mandate the repurposed IVM as an effective AV , SHE could grant EUA to Pfizer Biontech/Moderna et al - and in so doing she broke the law (and just like Alison Rose she does not give a f***.) - we all know now that effective repurposed AV and others drugs existed and were used very effectively by medics worldwide at the time she granted EUA status to the mRNA disasters - why has she not been arrested?
Equally she is so emboldened by the power she wields she now regards the MHRA as her personal fiefdom - calling it a drug enabler says it all, especially when it will now use approval processes from other, non UK , jurisdictions to grant approval to new (eg, mRNA, LNP delivered, both known to be toxic to humans ) drugs - with even less testing than the so called anti SARS COV2 drugs which we all know did not work as trumpeted.
Aug 2, 2023·edited Aug 2, 2023Liked by Norman Fenton
Back in August 2021 I had a lengthy back 'n forth email conversation with Medsafe here in NZ (I would imagine this is the equivalent to your MHRA) about the claim made on our Ministry of Health website that these products were perfectly safe for pregnant and lactating women (and their babies). I asked how they were able to make such a claim, given that at that stage there still wouldn't have been a post-vaccination completed pregnancy let alone a period of lactation. Even the "sponsor's" (Pfizer) information sheet made it clear that they did not yet have information to make any statement about safety amongst that cohort. Med"safe" provided me with links to various studies, but they were either not completed or hadn't even started! The only completed study they pointed me to was on rats. In the end I couldn't get a clear answer out of them and I gave up.
I have a screen shot for advice to expecting mother's (astra zeneca Aug 2021) the advice was to speak with your doctor and seek guidance before taking the product and it was listed as not suitable for under 18s at that time.
Digressing slightly.....even more horrifying is that here in NZ they were about to MANDATE it for just about everyone over the age of 12. They of course claimed it was a choice, but if the alternative is complete ostracising from society, jobs etc, then it's hardly a choice. Things got so bad that anyone 12 years old and over was unable to enter our little local library, swimming pool, public buildings, play on sports teams, get a haircut, go to the cinema, earn a living etc etc if they had not been jabbed at least twice. It was an horrendous time. I will never feel the same about this country I live in :(
Sounds like much of Europe. There was a short video of elderly lady in Italy who was refused to enter the tram because she didn't have a quaxxiine passport. There also was an article from Sweden in December 2021 where a 99 year old Granny wanted to hear her great-granddaughter sing at the Lucia celebration, but she was refused to enter the church even though she was quaxxinated but she didn't have the necessary qr code, so she had to wait outside in the car with another family member.
Remember, we're all in this together and the narrative said "Save Grandma".
The UK govern/mente were instrumental in the lockdown approach that was shared with X and current colonies, the UK wants to be a global leader in deregulated pharma and Johnson was our boy , Dominic Cummings was also likely a major player.The city of London needed a new revenue stream💉💉💉💉💉💉💉💉💉💉😷🤝🍻
They started off so well, looking like they weren't going to follow the craziness going on elsewhere. Then it seems Chris Whitty was uplifted by aliens and given a brain transplant, coming back with a view totally the opposite of what he espoused in a presentation on May 11th 2020. All very weird.
Hedley Reece helped set up the UK 💉💉💉💉supply chain and he was manouvered out his job, I think a cabal of UK nutjobs and financial backers saw the UK has a regulation free state on the edge of europe.
Global money laundering, war (UKraine, Johnson was heavily involved along with some russian oligarchs) and dodgy pharmaceutical products was the way forward. they wrote a book available online "Britania unchained" one of the authors is Dominic raab who has the IQ of a sponge.The whole thing was a staged event, we were watching a film in real time, the bodies lying in the streets of China was a staged event to creat fear , all done to push the product
It must have been horrific there. I felt bad enough being excluded from cafés , restaurants, concert halls etc but i could go to shops - not that I wanted to. I was ‘lucky’ that being British I could escape back to Britain where despite the madness I was still allowed a semi-normal life. What upset me so much was that so few of the vaccinated thought that this discrimination was wrong. Certainly left a bitter taste in my mouth!
This happened in many places. I live in Canada, and we experienced similar draconian restrictions. Now, however we are just supposed to ignore what happened and move on, while our institutions are still hopelessly corrupt and in bed with the pharmaceuticals. In Canada, Ivermectin is still seized at the border and they are now clamping down on alternative medicines. The pandemic may be over, but medical tyranny is getting worse.
I suspect they were just following " orders". It is astonishing to realize just how incompetent some of these public health people are. Many are also cowards, and they will not speak up when they see wrongdoing.
This is very revealing. Near the beginning of the vax campaign, the MHRA replied to my FOI asking for injury report numbers of other vaccine rollouts to demonstrate that as per their statement for the Covid vaccine, the vast report numbers "are not unusual". They failed to provide this data (ofc!) but they admitted one of the reasons the high numbers weren't considered unusual was because of the 1 in 10 ADR rate in the Pfizer trial and so theoretically there could have been way more yellow cards had everyone reported.
Because the true ADR rate found is 39% for the Pfizer vaccine in the YCVM (raising even more questions), they lied again. People are not just mysteriously reporting more, it is because the product is injurious. They have no boundary for numbers to change from usual to unusual. They even admitted this in their FOI response amongst other absurdities.
Their rationale for purging use of their general under reporting formula for the Covid vaccines has also been obliterated. They had the data. Differences are minimal.
MHRA condensed response: "We will release the data if and when we choose. If you don't like it, take a hike. All data parameters and conclusions used in the study will be subject to "agency scrutiny," assuring a truthful and trusted response. Don't bother contacting us, we'll contact you."
It does make one think that the need to hide facts and true outcomes, is perhaps not unrelated to the big Pharma financing and lobbying. It also adds credibility to the more extreme conspiracy theories of world depopulation. Scary stuff indeed.
Not theories at all. Kissinger report explicitly pushes depop. Limits to Growth is a forerunner to Agenda 21 / 30. The bioweapons have been long planned.
I recently contacted ONS about the very much delayed statistics on live births for 2022. They told me the data would be released on August 17th. I would very like an expert opinion on these numbers when they are released.
They’ll probably give Cheryl a date for release in 75 years just like the FDA tried!! Their data must be damning against the mRNA jabs otherwise they’d be shouting it from the rooftops about how great they are! Safe and effective right???!!!! Not!!!
As you can see from the UK Covid death data dashboard, once the vaccines were deployed at the start of 2021, deaths fell drastically and, despite repeated Covid outbreaks, have remained low.
Indeed, research by Imperial College London, published in the Lancet Infectious Diseases journal, suggests 19.8 million deaths were prevented overall because of the vaccine. Lead author, Dr Oliver Watson, said nearly 7.5 million deaths were prevented in countries covered by the Covax scheme, which provided access to vaccines and tests to poorer countries.
Every vaccine used in the UK is subject to extensive approval by the independent Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. The MHRA are also required to monitor the use of the vaccines to ensure their benefits outweigh any risks.
While misinformation and disinformation continue to try and dilute empirical facts rigorously tested by the MHRA, there is no doubt that vaccination has been the world’s most effective tool against coronavirus.
Of course, I recognise that there can be side effects with any vaccine but, thankfully, serious incidents such as Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis have been rare."
Excerpt from my MP's recent reply to one of my previous challenges-( I asked her to study the Perseus report).
I have been exchanging emails with my MP, a senior doctor, for over 2 years, but she is adamant, as will be noted above, that the jabs are saving millions of lives.
It will last as long as their careers in Parliament, and beyond, depend on it.....
In the case of the medics, it should additionally be borne in mind that they too were influenced by the fear psy op; the early medical training that makes vaccines unquestionably good things; and the personal humiliation (and fear?) which would result from facing reality.
In the case of people like Raine et al, we have to assume that, in possession of all the figures, and therefore fully aware of the great harm they are causing and are likely to cause in the next 'pandemic', they believe they are serving some higher goal: national health defence in an age of bio-warfare? Advancing the cause of Science which has been held back by traditional restrictions and moral scruples?
Certainly, in public they don't look as if they feel aware of having anything to be ashamed of. Being payed off by Big Pharma lacks sufficient explanatory substance, in my view.
Dame June may believe she is helping build a better world: always the most dangerous and ruthless people, as the 20thc amply demonstrated.
"I have been exchanging emails with my MP, a senior doctor, for over 2 years, but she is adamant, as will be noted above, that the jabs are saving millions of lives." and I bet does not cite one scintilla of credible evidence - just as does my MP ( in the thick of factchecking blx and UK Intelligence led surveillance/social media stalking - "you know who you are" if he sees this haha ) when he trots out the "safe and effective" rubbish.
All this failure to release attitude has a positive side in the sense that when, and I mean when, (think bigtobacco) the tide turns it will be another string to the bow of litigation lawyers.
Maybe they should take legal advice on the implications of this as opposed to taking too much notice of "suggestions" from government officials who will never be accountable.
Someone should perhaps remind them that they will be. Just following orders won't wash.
The problem with overall ADR rates is that they are not particularly meaningful in themselves. After all, a stiff arm after injection qualifies as an ADR and who didn’t get one of those? However, the real scandal here is that the MHRA, after publicly boasting a new culture of enablement, thinks it not in the public’s best interest to fully disclose the results of the safety monitoring of pregnant women at the earliest possible opportunity. And when maximum transparency is of the essence, obvious concerns are glibly dismissed by reference to a previous public statement. Is such indolence really in the public interest? Does creating an information vacuum that will inevitably be filled with concerned speculation really qualify as the actions of a public-serving body?
Yes I agree the ADR numbers don’t mean much in isolation. But I found it remarkable that they made no attempt to highlight the serious events and also no mention of deaths of which we know there were some even certified as AZ before end of June 2021
It might seem like a minor point but getting names of people attached to these documents rather than departments is vital as liability can then be attached to a person, this will cause a great deal of stress for those concerned, demand a name🤝👍
OK then. The names of the members of the Pharmacovigilance Expert Advisory Group (PEAG). Jamie Coleman, Darren Ashcroft, Ann Daly, Dan Hawcutt, Ian Douglas, Karen Miller, Alana Adams, Richard FitzGerald, Patricia McGettigan, Madeleine Wang & Reecha Sofat: https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/commission-on-human-medicines/about/membership
Thank you but with regards to letters/emails from government agencies there is generally a response from the agency with no name attached to it 🤝
"demand a name"
Just so.
The utilitarian calculus is always applied by individuals. These individuals create and impose policies and procedures. Invariably, they seek the plausible deniability afforded by preserving their anonymity.
Anyone who has suffered the unfortunate necessity of clearing a building of an invasion of sewer rats will have observed that it's always the younger and less experienced rats that are initially found in the traps. Those who are relatively inexperienced with rodent behavior will assume that the first wave of full traps denotes success, and will end their rodent control initiative prematurely. The older and more cautious rats then remain free to repopulate in preparation for the next invasion.
The key to ridding one's home of disease-carrying rodents, lies in identifying and isolating the vermin with whom the invasion originated.
I keep feeling that were living in the Terry Gilliam film "Brazil"
As to the rats , they scurry about in the shadows and most people don't want to acknowledge there existence and all the people that took the product don't want to accept it was something other than they thought and choose not to see the rats scurrying around there feet.
Getting the furry ones out the sewers will not be easy ,they have an elaborate layer and have spent many years mastering there skills of subterfuge and deception.
🐈🐈🐈🐈🐈🐈🤝
On the contrary, one can be sure that they will not experience the least distress.
Everyone involved in the AZ debacle was honoured: Dames and Knights the lot of them.
So, can we really imagine that they will be facing up to their liability for the deaths and injuries in the future?
They have the stamp of full approval from HMG and the Establishment.
We must be realistic: justice will not be done, particularly as MP's - who theoretically could move to clean this up - are, almost universally, with a handful of honourable exceptions, so supine and conforming to the agenda.
I think the west is in for a terrible time my thoughts are find a country (state) with a small population, good climate and a high level of self sufficiency.Things will keep deteriorating as that's what the people in the shadows want👍
"An astonishing 53% of all those in the study reported at least one ADR (POST VAX adverse drug reaction)!"
Us proud Conspiracy theorists will automatically realise that if 53% KNOW OF their Adverse Drug Reactions to the useless but potentially deadly injection' how many are not even aware?
How many have no idea they have unknowingly suffered an Adverse Reaction? Perhaps, delayed reaction, life-threatening or perhaps terminal! That could increase the number of ADRs to over 70%.
Then add the unknown (and therefore unreported) consequences for the unborn baby! It's totally insane and ridiculous to even consider taking these deadly jabs.
'NO LIABILITY' for Pfizer et al, tells us all we need to realise that this deadly depopulating crap must be avoided at all costs!
Mick from Hooe (UK) Unjabbed to live longer!
"Point 26 in the report states “Given the volume of pregnant women enrolled in the YCVM, we have an important future data source to support continuous and long term monitoring of pregnancy outcomes and will provide an update to the VBR in due course.” Yet the MHRA is still refusing to publish the results of these outcomes two years later,"
I think we all know that if the information was supporting their position it would have been quickly brought out and widekly broadcast. It must be really bad if they are taking this long to try and spin it.
Thanks both, excellent work as always.
The JCVI made the recommendation that pregnant women should receive Pfizer or Moderna along with the rest of the population in April 2021, based on the very dubious v-safe pregnancy register study carried out in the US. I presume that the MHRA pregnancy study was ongoing at the time, but was effectively made redundant (at least for Moderna and Pfizer vaccines) by the JCVI's decision in April. So did the MHRA actually bother to continue to collect data (their communications suggest they did) but was the outcome not favourable with respect to the decision already made by the government to promote the vaccine as 'safe and effective' for pregnant women?
https://climatecontrarian.wordpress.com/2021/05/09/daily-mail-promotes-highly-dubious-claim-that-the-vaccines-are-safe-for-pregnant-women/
I suspect the MHRA stopped collecting the data in July 2021
Hi Norman did you ever get the pregnancy data? I strongly suspect the report was released in late Feb-early March 22 where there was a mysterious data entry surge, just like there was a mysterious surge in late June-July 21 at the time of the vaccine monitor report. The surge in March is alarming btw!
I read alot of the NHS info on the product at the time it was released and with regards to pregnancy ,it just kept saying that the data was not available or the trials not completed ,as to safe&effective it was a marketing slogan nothing more and some of the newspapers were "advertising" the shots as a "promotion" this was done in the telegraph but they changed the wording in later editions but I have seen this more than once.They new from day one that the product did not stop transmission and did not meet the criteria for a vaxcine it is an inoculation.
The article echoes this but differs in one extremely important aspect although it nails the point about what - and when - constitutes a spontaneous abortion.
This was published by The Expose here:
https://expose-news.com/2021/11/07/cdc-scientists-admit-they-did-manipulate-study-data-to-show-the-covid-19-vaccines-are-safe-for-pregnant-women/
The NZ doctors study is here:
https://cf5e727d-d02d-4d71-89ff-9fe2d3ad957f.filesusr.com/ugd/adf864_2bd97450072f4364a65e5cf1d7384dd4.pdf
So whilst the MHRA are still "hiding" the relevant data, does it really matter when you read through the above - IMHO, not a medical professional, NOT ONE JOT - the damning evidence has been "in plain sight" for 2+ years!!!
Any reliance placed upon the study from the US is highly suspect and very disturbing - but that would have been the case 2 + years ago. The UK NHS - in the form of individual NHS Trusts - has covered up the huge increase in foetal deaths where the Mother was jabbed - why else would these NHS Trusts have taken over the registration of the death, arranged for the cremation of the cadaver - destroying the evidence before an autopsy? It is a massive unreported scandal that continues - Cheryl, please contact John O'Looney to corroborate this if you have not done so already. Should anyone consider this a "conspiracy theory", JOL knows and MOH is NHS non clinical working in this sphere where highly educated (?) clinical Obs/GoBs medics are STILL insisting pregnant mothers have theses jabs - medical malpractice suits await if someone/some people have the balls to sue - the RC's and the medical trades unions are ignoring these trial data so no help there.
In case this is forgotten, Raine is the criminal who deliberately interfered in how UK medics could treat their patients by the - non - approval of IVM as an early treatment AV for CV19 sufferers; her quango actively participated in the confiscation by UK Border Force of IVM imported in to the UK by individuals; her corrupt management of an equally corrupt UK quango, heavily influenced sorry compromised by money from Bill Gates meant that because SHE did not mandate the repurposed IVM as an effective AV , SHE could grant EUA to Pfizer Biontech/Moderna et al - and in so doing she broke the law (and just like Alison Rose she does not give a f***.) - we all know now that effective repurposed AV and others drugs existed and were used very effectively by medics worldwide at the time she granted EUA status to the mRNA disasters - why has she not been arrested?
Equally she is so emboldened by the power she wields she now regards the MHRA as her personal fiefdom - calling it a drug enabler says it all, especially when it will now use approval processes from other, non UK , jurisdictions to grant approval to new (eg, mRNA, LNP delivered, both known to be toxic to humans ) drugs - with even less testing than the so called anti SARS COV2 drugs which we all know did not work as trumpeted.
Back in August 2021 I had a lengthy back 'n forth email conversation with Medsafe here in NZ (I would imagine this is the equivalent to your MHRA) about the claim made on our Ministry of Health website that these products were perfectly safe for pregnant and lactating women (and their babies). I asked how they were able to make such a claim, given that at that stage there still wouldn't have been a post-vaccination completed pregnancy let alone a period of lactation. Even the "sponsor's" (Pfizer) information sheet made it clear that they did not yet have information to make any statement about safety amongst that cohort. Med"safe" provided me with links to various studies, but they were either not completed or hadn't even started! The only completed study they pointed me to was on rats. In the end I couldn't get a clear answer out of them and I gave up.
I have a screen shot for advice to expecting mother's (astra zeneca Aug 2021) the advice was to speak with your doctor and seek guidance before taking the product and it was listed as not suitable for under 18s at that time.
Digressing slightly.....even more horrifying is that here in NZ they were about to MANDATE it for just about everyone over the age of 12. They of course claimed it was a choice, but if the alternative is complete ostracising from society, jobs etc, then it's hardly a choice. Things got so bad that anyone 12 years old and over was unable to enter our little local library, swimming pool, public buildings, play on sports teams, get a haircut, go to the cinema, earn a living etc etc if they had not been jabbed at least twice. It was an horrendous time. I will never feel the same about this country I live in :(
Sounds like much of Europe. There was a short video of elderly lady in Italy who was refused to enter the tram because she didn't have a quaxxiine passport. There also was an article from Sweden in December 2021 where a 99 year old Granny wanted to hear her great-granddaughter sing at the Lucia celebration, but she was refused to enter the church even though she was quaxxinated but she didn't have the necessary qr code, so she had to wait outside in the car with another family member.
Remember, we're all in this together and the narrative said "Save Grandma".
The UK govern/mente were instrumental in the lockdown approach that was shared with X and current colonies, the UK wants to be a global leader in deregulated pharma and Johnson was our boy , Dominic Cummings was also likely a major player.The city of London needed a new revenue stream💉💉💉💉💉💉💉💉💉💉😷🤝🍻
They started off so well, looking like they weren't going to follow the craziness going on elsewhere. Then it seems Chris Whitty was uplifted by aliens and given a brain transplant, coming back with a view totally the opposite of what he espoused in a presentation on May 11th 2020. All very weird.
Hedley Reece helped set up the UK 💉💉💉💉supply chain and he was manouvered out his job, I think a cabal of UK nutjobs and financial backers saw the UK has a regulation free state on the edge of europe.
Global money laundering, war (UKraine, Johnson was heavily involved along with some russian oligarchs) and dodgy pharmaceutical products was the way forward. they wrote a book available online "Britania unchained" one of the authors is Dominic raab who has the IQ of a sponge.The whole thing was a staged event, we were watching a film in real time, the bodies lying in the streets of China was a staged event to creat fear , all done to push the product
It must have been horrific there. I felt bad enough being excluded from cafés , restaurants, concert halls etc but i could go to shops - not that I wanted to. I was ‘lucky’ that being British I could escape back to Britain where despite the madness I was still allowed a semi-normal life. What upset me so much was that so few of the vaccinated thought that this discrimination was wrong. Certainly left a bitter taste in my mouth!
This happened in many places. I live in Canada, and we experienced similar draconian restrictions. Now, however we are just supposed to ignore what happened and move on, while our institutions are still hopelessly corrupt and in bed with the pharmaceuticals. In Canada, Ivermectin is still seized at the border and they are now clamping down on alternative medicines. The pandemic may be over, but medical tyranny is getting worse.
Interesting to note our dates are the same and the NHs info mirrored what you state👍
And we share rats as well🥴
I don't think there is an end date for the completion of the human trials so the rats should be safe🐀🐀🐀🐀🐀🐀🐀🐀🐀🐀🐀🐀🐀🐀🐀🐀🤞
🤞🤝🐀🐀🐀🐀🐀🚀
I suspect they were just following " orders". It is astonishing to realize just how incompetent some of these public health people are. Many are also cowards, and they will not speak up when they see wrongdoing.
This is very revealing. Near the beginning of the vax campaign, the MHRA replied to my FOI asking for injury report numbers of other vaccine rollouts to demonstrate that as per their statement for the Covid vaccine, the vast report numbers "are not unusual". They failed to provide this data (ofc!) but they admitted one of the reasons the high numbers weren't considered unusual was because of the 1 in 10 ADR rate in the Pfizer trial and so theoretically there could have been way more yellow cards had everyone reported.
Because the true ADR rate found is 39% for the Pfizer vaccine in the YCVM (raising even more questions), they lied again. People are not just mysteriously reporting more, it is because the product is injurious. They have no boundary for numbers to change from usual to unusual. They even admitted this in their FOI response amongst other absurdities.
Their rationale for purging use of their general under reporting formula for the Covid vaccines has also been obliterated. They had the data. Differences are minimal.
Thanks for this superb post!
There is a total conflict of interest, I assume designed to be the case. The MHRA dare not bite the hands that feed it.
https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2023-01-09/119065
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/freedom-of-information-responses-from-the-mhra-week-commencing-21-june-2021/freedom-of-information-request-on-whether-the-mhra-receives-funding-from-the-bill-and-melinda-gates-foundation-foi-21-624
MHRA condensed response: "We will release the data if and when we choose. If you don't like it, take a hike. All data parameters and conclusions used in the study will be subject to "agency scrutiny," assuring a truthful and trusted response. Don't bother contacting us, we'll contact you."
Those understanding slavery have lost all trust in the "government health agencies." Speaking of oxymorons.
It does make one think that the need to hide facts and true outcomes, is perhaps not unrelated to the big Pharma financing and lobbying. It also adds credibility to the more extreme conspiracy theories of world depopulation. Scary stuff indeed.
Not theories at all. Kissinger report explicitly pushes depop. Limits to Growth is a forerunner to Agenda 21 / 30. The bioweapons have been long planned.
If anyone finds a link between the MHRA and a eugenics group, that will be big news.
. . . Big news that would never be reported in 'the news'.
I recently contacted ONS about the very much delayed statistics on live births for 2022. They told me the data would be released on August 17th. I would very like an expert opinion on these numbers when they are released.
Interesting. They never gave Cheryl a date. When did they tell you that?
A few days ago. This was ONS though, not MHRA
Ah yes. This will be completely different data to the MHRA monitored group. And like al the ONS covid data it will be unreliable.
They’ll probably give Cheryl a date for release in 75 years just like the FDA tried!! Their data must be damning against the mRNA jabs otherwise they’d be shouting it from the rooftops about how great they are! Safe and effective right???!!!! Not!!!
Please review the links I posted above - the "stats" are already in the public domain and have been so for more than 2 years...
As you can see from the UK Covid death data dashboard, once the vaccines were deployed at the start of 2021, deaths fell drastically and, despite repeated Covid outbreaks, have remained low.
Deaths from COVID in UK
Source GOV.UK Coronavirus (COVID-19) in the UK
Image
Indeed, research by Imperial College London, published in the Lancet Infectious Diseases journal, suggests 19.8 million deaths were prevented overall because of the vaccine. Lead author, Dr Oliver Watson, said nearly 7.5 million deaths were prevented in countries covered by the Covax scheme, which provided access to vaccines and tests to poorer countries.
Every vaccine used in the UK is subject to extensive approval by the independent Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. The MHRA are also required to monitor the use of the vaccines to ensure their benefits outweigh any risks.
While misinformation and disinformation continue to try and dilute empirical facts rigorously tested by the MHRA, there is no doubt that vaccination has been the world’s most effective tool against coronavirus.
Of course, I recognise that there can be side effects with any vaccine but, thankfully, serious incidents such as Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis have been rare."
Excerpt from my MP's recent reply to one of my previous challenges-( I asked her to study the Perseus report).
I have been exchanging emails with my MP, a senior doctor, for over 2 years, but she is adamant, as will be noted above, that the jabs are saving millions of lives.
It's the standard response every MP seems to send no matter how much evidence their constituents provide to the contrary in their letters.
From a senior doctor as well; how much longer will this ostrich syndrome last I wonder?
It will last as long as their careers in Parliament, and beyond, depend on it.....
In the case of the medics, it should additionally be borne in mind that they too were influenced by the fear psy op; the early medical training that makes vaccines unquestionably good things; and the personal humiliation (and fear?) which would result from facing reality.
In the case of people like Raine et al, we have to assume that, in possession of all the figures, and therefore fully aware of the great harm they are causing and are likely to cause in the next 'pandemic', they believe they are serving some higher goal: national health defence in an age of bio-warfare? Advancing the cause of Science which has been held back by traditional restrictions and moral scruples?
Certainly, in public they don't look as if they feel aware of having anything to be ashamed of. Being payed off by Big Pharma lacks sufficient explanatory substance, in my view.
Dame June may believe she is helping build a better world: always the most dangerous and ruthless people, as the 20thc amply demonstrated.
"I have been exchanging emails with my MP, a senior doctor, for over 2 years, but she is adamant, as will be noted above, that the jabs are saving millions of lives." and I bet does not cite one scintilla of credible evidence - just as does my MP ( in the thick of factchecking blx and UK Intelligence led surveillance/social media stalking - "you know who you are" if he sees this haha ) when he trots out the "safe and effective" rubbish.
Joke MP
All this failure to release attitude has a positive side in the sense that when, and I mean when, (think bigtobacco) the tide turns it will be another string to the bow of litigation lawyers.
Maybe they should take legal advice on the implications of this as opposed to taking too much notice of "suggestions" from government officials who will never be accountable.
Someone should perhaps remind them that they will be. Just following orders won't wash.
They have started releasing FOIA data in the USA. First link is from FDA and second is from CDC from trial data from manufacturers.
https://daily.news.uncoverdc.com/link.php?AGENCY=mri&M=902981&N=4813&L=4387&F=H&drurl=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cudW5jb3ZlcmRjLmNvbS8yMDIzLzA3LzI0L21vZGVybmEtc3Bpa2V2YXgtdHJpYWwtZGF0YS1zaG93LXNlcmlvdXMtYWR2ZXJzZS1ldmVudHMtYW5kLWRlYXRoP3V0bV9jb250ZW50PUNPVEF5T1RneA==&hash=589da0b14d09829d068af1b07553d18624a09d36bafdc612d6a1575a0eba81de
https://daily.news.uncoverdc.com/link.php?AGENCY=mri&M=902981&N=4851&L=4440&F=H&drurl=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cudW5jb3ZlcmRjLmNvbS8yMDIzLzA3LzI3L2ljYW4tZm9pYS1tb2Rlcm5hLWRhdGEtc2hvd3MtYWxhcm1pbmctbG90LXNwZWNpZmljLWRhdGEtb24tbXJuYS1zaG90cz91dG1fY29udGVudD1DT1RBeU9UZ3g=&hash=ee9887bd76fbcee940dcab55f65e5f9f3912fcaf3fa089977d5bf67b27beca39
Last time I checked there was a noob from EY sitting on the MHRA board with a background in digital ID, implementation and rollout.
I'd like to invite the MHRA board for a drink at my local... The Rope and Lamp-post... Trebles all round.
The problem with overall ADR rates is that they are not particularly meaningful in themselves. After all, a stiff arm after injection qualifies as an ADR and who didn’t get one of those? However, the real scandal here is that the MHRA, after publicly boasting a new culture of enablement, thinks it not in the public’s best interest to fully disclose the results of the safety monitoring of pregnant women at the earliest possible opportunity. And when maximum transparency is of the essence, obvious concerns are glibly dismissed by reference to a previous public statement. Is such indolence really in the public interest? Does creating an information vacuum that will inevitably be filled with concerned speculation really qualify as the actions of a public-serving body?
Yes I agree the ADR numbers don’t mean much in isolation. But I found it remarkable that they made no attempt to highlight the serious events and also no mention of deaths of which we know there were some even certified as AZ before end of June 2021
"We will release no (damning) report before its time" - with apologies to Paul Masson and Orson Welles.