My issue with Marc's bolus theory is that it is one part of the picture, albeit an important one, but it allows a simple narrative to explain the harms which those who negligently pushed this crap into people can latch onto as some sort of “excuse” (“if only they’d have aspirated everything would have been OK”), when the truth is much more complex.
For one thing, as you acknowledge, though IV injection may be particularly dangerous, aspiration does not in any case eliminate it from happening so the danger exists whatever the injection methodology.
Then there's the fact that even if the bolus theory was correct it would only account for a subset of the harms. It is (IMO) inconceivable that something incredibly dangerous is then made acceptably safe by avoiding a blood vessel.
The immune dysfunction in particular would logically seem not to depend on this.
One small correction, the whole aspiration question comes down to the WHO recommending in 2004 following Plotkin and Orenstein's Paediatric vaccination paper of the same year to the National health bodies around the world, most National bodies simply took the easy option and applied it to ALL IM injections.
When I had my AZ jab the retired Dr. was more than happy to aspirate when I asked for him to do so, and delivered the dose slowly having proven the location, he commented he was more than happy to do so as that's what he'd done with IM throughout his career. The young 'administrator' supervising however tried to object to it being done that way, and called the vaccination centre manager over to admonish the Dr. for not following the protocol.
Thank you for posting this Professor Fenton - and for constantly keeping us abreast of the latest theories and numbers. Amongst all this complexity, we are so grateful that people such as yourself commit to and sacrifice inordinate amount of time and temerity for us and for future generations. These groundbreaking theories have the potential to save lives immediately, but more importantly also if deemed so incredibly unsafe, the potential to bring these dangerous products and programs to an end . Everyone needs to watch these videos and if they decide it has merit, speak out and save our children and loved ones.
The separate Pfizer and Moderna "gold standard" randomized clinical trials BOTH had a 15-17% increase in non-COVID deaths, and specifically a 40-50% increase in cardiovascular-related deaths, with vaccine versus placebo. These excess deaths almost all occurred AFTER 1 month post-vaccine.
As a scientist with lots of experience in medical research, I strongly believe that the BIGGEST MISTAKE "our side" has made is paying little or no attention to these truly atrocious mortality results in the two "gold standard" clinical trials, which show that the mRNA vaccines are INHERENTLY unsafe. The net mortality impact of the mRNA vaccines in the two clinical trials was "4 killed for every 3 saved".
For those who want to hear counterarguments to Marc Girardot's bolus theory, I made a thread on Twitter in October 2022 covering the most important points:
"Lack of aspiration in relation to side effects incidence and intravenous injection lottery are bogus arguments, in my opinion. The package itself is ultimately what matters."
It is perfectly possible that the vaccines are dangerous to various systems over the long term, but bad administration generates damage appear sooner and concentrated over the cardiovascular system.
I am really concerned about this theory being perpetuated, it ignores so much that is already known about how the injection causes harm and it allows the idea that if only they aspirated the needle first, all would be fine...that is absolutely not the case.
FACT: the CEO of BioNTech stated categorically that the "vaccine" delivery mechanisms were engineered to allow them to ESCAPE the muscle site and to go everywhere in the human body. This has nothing to do with aspiration. The encapsulated molecules - BY DESIGN! - wind up everywhere. The particles have been found in 21 different organs.
Those who are succumbing within hours to the effects of the jabs are clearly experiencing some type of anaphylactic allergic response to one or more of the largely unknown components (the PEG would be a prime candidate) as no conceivable mechanism related to gene editing or mRNA could explain the rapidity.
The fact that similar adverse reactions occur in actual COVID cases, as well as with vaccines, points to a different mechanism. The mechanism is related to crosstalk occurring between spike protein and G-protein-coupled-receptors (GPCR), most likely involving pathways regulated by Gq/11.
This was pointed out sometime ago by a GP who posted a video detailing his principled objection to so called "vaccines" and other SARS COV2/CV19 matters. I did not understand this when I was jabbed - and I can testify that aspiration was NOT performed.
After extensive research and wide reading by YT, I then asked myself : "Why on this earth would a jab be administered to counter a respiratory viral infection ( as was hammered into us relentlessly ) ...into a muscle in the arm?"
Are we now to understand that an intravenous jab, inducing a malign pharmacokinetic effect, was a deliberate act or medical incompetence? Given that it was known pre EUA that these jabs caused Myocarditis and worse, and Javed's refusal to mandate aspiration, to whom do I direct my no win no fee medical negligence suit?
Clearly aspiration would make a difference, but there is also the lymph system to spread the amazing lipid nanotech to all organs of the body with the dangerous synthetic mRNA protected for God knows how long.
I'm an old nurse, and I was taught to aspirate every time, full stop. Even if they had asked me not to aspirate I would have...it's automatic. And I agree that bolus is not likely to be the only (or even major) cause of harm. As with so many (if not all) things, it's probably multifactorial.
Of course, it was part of the insanity that they were inviting amateurs to administer and I pointed out in the September 2020 consultation that a high percentage of US vaccine court payouts were for arm injuries
My issue with Marc's bolus theory is that it is one part of the picture, albeit an important one, but it allows a simple narrative to explain the harms which those who negligently pushed this crap into people can latch onto as some sort of “excuse” (“if only they’d have aspirated everything would have been OK”), when the truth is much more complex.
For one thing, as you acknowledge, though IV injection may be particularly dangerous, aspiration does not in any case eliminate it from happening so the danger exists whatever the injection methodology.
Then there's the fact that even if the bolus theory was correct it would only account for a subset of the harms. It is (IMO) inconceivable that something incredibly dangerous is then made acceptably safe by avoiding a blood vessel.
The immune dysfunction in particular would logically seem not to depend on this.
One small correction, the whole aspiration question comes down to the WHO recommending in 2004 following Plotkin and Orenstein's Paediatric vaccination paper of the same year to the National health bodies around the world, most National bodies simply took the easy option and applied it to ALL IM injections.
When I had my AZ jab the retired Dr. was more than happy to aspirate when I asked for him to do so, and delivered the dose slowly having proven the location, he commented he was more than happy to do so as that's what he'd done with IM throughout his career. The young 'administrator' supervising however tried to object to it being done that way, and called the vaccination centre manager over to admonish the Dr. for not following the protocol.
Thank you for posting this Professor Fenton - and for constantly keeping us abreast of the latest theories and numbers. Amongst all this complexity, we are so grateful that people such as yourself commit to and sacrifice inordinate amount of time and temerity for us and for future generations. These groundbreaking theories have the potential to save lives immediately, but more importantly also if deemed so incredibly unsafe, the potential to bring these dangerous products and programs to an end . Everyone needs to watch these videos and if they decide it has merit, speak out and save our children and loved ones.
The separate Pfizer and Moderna "gold standard" randomized clinical trials BOTH had a 15-17% increase in non-COVID deaths, and specifically a 40-50% increase in cardiovascular-related deaths, with vaccine versus placebo. These excess deaths almost all occurred AFTER 1 month post-vaccine.
Pfizer: https://www.nejm.org/doi/suppl/10.1056/NEJMoa2110345/suppl_file/nejmoa2110345_appendix.pdf – Table S4
Moderna: https://www.nejm.org/doi/suppl/10.1056/NEJMoa2113017/suppl_file/nejmoa2113017_appendix.pdf – Table S26
As a scientist with lots of experience in medical research, I strongly believe that the BIGGEST MISTAKE "our side" has made is paying little or no attention to these truly atrocious mortality results in the two "gold standard" clinical trials, which show that the mRNA vaccines are INHERENTLY unsafe. The net mortality impact of the mRNA vaccines in the two clinical trials was "4 killed for every 3 saved".
For those who want to hear counterarguments to Marc Girardot's bolus theory, I made a thread on Twitter in October 2022 covering the most important points:
"Lack of aspiration in relation to side effects incidence and intravenous injection lottery are bogus arguments, in my opinion. The package itself is ultimately what matters."
https://twitter.com/B33Mello/status/1580291132826656768
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1580291132826656768.html
It is perfectly possible that the vaccines are dangerous to various systems over the long term, but bad administration generates damage appear sooner and concentrated over the cardiovascular system.
I am really concerned about this theory being perpetuated, it ignores so much that is already known about how the injection causes harm and it allows the idea that if only they aspirated the needle first, all would be fine...that is absolutely not the case.
Perhaps the problem is that the wrong aspirations were and are being used: Big Pharma has aspirations for ever more power and wealth.
FACT: the CEO of BioNTech stated categorically that the "vaccine" delivery mechanisms were engineered to allow them to ESCAPE the muscle site and to go everywhere in the human body. This has nothing to do with aspiration. The encapsulated molecules - BY DESIGN! - wind up everywhere. The particles have been found in 21 different organs.
Those who are succumbing within hours to the effects of the jabs are clearly experiencing some type of anaphylactic allergic response to one or more of the largely unknown components (the PEG would be a prime candidate) as no conceivable mechanism related to gene editing or mRNA could explain the rapidity.
The fact that similar adverse reactions occur in actual COVID cases, as well as with vaccines, points to a different mechanism. The mechanism is related to crosstalk occurring between spike protein and G-protein-coupled-receptors (GPCR), most likely involving pathways regulated by Gq/11.
This was pointed out sometime ago by a GP who posted a video detailing his principled objection to so called "vaccines" and other SARS COV2/CV19 matters. I did not understand this when I was jabbed - and I can testify that aspiration was NOT performed.
After extensive research and wide reading by YT, I then asked myself : "Why on this earth would a jab be administered to counter a respiratory viral infection ( as was hammered into us relentlessly ) ...into a muscle in the arm?"
Are we now to understand that an intravenous jab, inducing a malign pharmacokinetic effect, was a deliberate act or medical incompetence? Given that it was known pre EUA that these jabs caused Myocarditis and worse, and Javed's refusal to mandate aspiration, to whom do I direct my no win no fee medical negligence suit?
Clearly aspiration would make a difference, but there is also the lymph system to spread the amazing lipid nanotech to all organs of the body with the dangerous synthetic mRNA protected for God knows how long.
I really enjoyed the interview with John Campbell, and it makes intuitive sense.
I'm an old nurse, and I was taught to aspirate every time, full stop. Even if they had asked me not to aspirate I would have...it's automatic. And I agree that bolus is not likely to be the only (or even major) cause of harm. As with so many (if not all) things, it's probably multifactorial.
Of course, it was part of the insanity that they were inviting amateurs to administer and I pointed out in the September 2020 consultation that a high percentage of US vaccine court payouts were for arm injuries
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/response-to-the-british-government-proposal-to-roll-out-a-covd-19-vaccine-before-christmas/
I was also at pains to point out the adenovirus problem associated with AZ, J&J etc.
https://www.ageofautism.com/2022/04/british-regulator-stalls-clot-ingredients-covid-injections.html
It is highly illustrative of the gung-ho criminal mentality but I don’t really believe it is more than the tip of the iceberg.
I struggle with the "one size fits all approach" and it does an excellent job of removing the product from the equation.