Nov 13·edited Nov 13Liked by Martin Neil, Norman Fenton
"electronic version of references" - Brilliant, every book with many references should do this. I often want to read a few and the chore of typing from text is a big deterrent. Maybe publishers should have a 'duty of care' for readers. Thank you.
Martin and Norman, I would LOVE to listen to an audio version of this! I find I "read" more when I can listen while doing other things such as driving. I would guess many others would like such as well. Any chance that could be created? If not, I will buy the book anyway, but it will take me much longer to get through it.
It's a lot of effort but an AI might manage a text to speech translation. At the moment we don't really have the available time to devote to it though.
Norman and Martin, thank you very much for the electronic references! Much much easier to get to the references … and so much more likely that people (including me) will do so. Much appreciated! Barry
You quote very many papers on radiographic diagnosis of Pneumonia in COVID. What percentage of these papers referred to the CDC EPIC studies? I have a hunch that those papers that were sponsored by the Chinese Communist Party, MODERNA, or Pfizer did not allow the CDC EPIC Study papers to be quoted.
The EPIC studies, published in 2015, were to date the best studies on the etiology of Pneumonia. In over 62% of cases, no Etiology could be determined. Moreover, the EPIC papers stress that PCR diagnosis of respiratory infections should not be done on nasopharyngeal or oropharyngeal swabs. These findings destroy the prevailing COVID-19 narrative.
"electronic version of references" - Brilliant, every book with many references should do this. I often want to read a few and the chore of typing from text is a big deterrent. Maybe publishers should have a 'duty of care' for readers. Thank you.
Martin and Norman, I would LOVE to listen to an audio version of this! I find I "read" more when I can listen while doing other things such as driving. I would guess many others would like such as well. Any chance that could be created? If not, I will buy the book anyway, but it will take me much longer to get through it.
It's a lot of effort but an AI might manage a text to speech translation. At the moment we don't really have the available time to devote to it though.
As someone who lost a loved one in a road accident: do not listen to complicated audio books while driving. Listen to good music instead. Please.
Norman and Martin, thank you very much for the electronic references! Much much easier to get to the references … and so much more likely that people (including me) will do so. Much appreciated! Barry
You quote very many papers on radiographic diagnosis of Pneumonia in COVID. What percentage of these papers referred to the CDC EPIC studies? I have a hunch that those papers that were sponsored by the Chinese Communist Party, MODERNA, or Pfizer did not allow the CDC EPIC Study papers to be quoted.
The EPIC studies, published in 2015, were to date the best studies on the etiology of Pneumonia. In over 62% of cases, no Etiology could be determined. Moreover, the EPIC papers stress that PCR diagnosis of respiratory infections should not be done on nasopharyngeal or oropharyngeal swabs. These findings destroy the prevailing COVID-19 narrative.