26 Comments

The way they label anyone that dies shortly after the 'vaccine' as unvaccinated just shows you how well thought out this fraud and genocide is.

Expand full comment

The falsified stats are shocking, and clear evidence of shenanigans, however their only real use is in the [hopefully] court cases against all involved: unfortunately realisation of having been misled is not going to help anyone that did fall for the scam; there may be a lot of damage still to come.

As soon as I realised that the ladies in Waitrose, as well as all Newmarket stable staff, seemed to be surviving perfectly well I decided to do some simple research. First stops included John Iaonnidis [as "the statisticians' statistician"] and he, based upon a test case of a cruise ship full of elderly folk, anticipated a fatality similar to flu. Once we started to be beaten over the head with CPR testing I decided to have a look at the test and discovered that the inventor of this test basically said that it should on no account been used as a diagnostic tool. Anyone with any common sense ought to have already realised that covid stats that included "any death within [ originally 60?!] 28 days of a positive test" was a joke, whether or not they were aware of Kari Mullis's warning regarding diagnoses. Without going full conspiracy theorist on Fauci, Mullis's scathing opinion of him was interesting.

When Boris Zaza [Godfather 3 reference!] came out with the wizzard wheeze that, although vaccines are normally several years in developement, "our scientists" had brilliantly produced one at the drop of the hat, and that he had decided to absolve them from the normal responsibility for anything going wrong, Anyone With The Brains Of A Rabbit ought to have said "leave me out".

About that stage Michael Yeadon and many other eminent, independent, scientists strongly condemned the vaccination plan. They were all quickly canceled. Yeadon went so far as to say "although not a religious man I cannot help feeling that we are in the presence of great evil". The falsification of data recorded here seem to make that dramatic opinion inarguable!

Expand full comment

Well done chaps!

May the force be with you (and the farce be defeated before it decimates the population!)

All the best

Peter

Expand full comment
author

Thanks Peter!

Expand full comment

Great. I started my substack based on some feedback I got from Prof. Fenton, so I am very glad to see you guys are finally here too.

Expand full comment

The defintions smackdown after 4 mins lays out the scam. There was no pandemic, there was a planned genocide of the elderly/vulnerable aka eugenics culmunating in mass experimental mRNA injections for all human beings on Earth, we can only surmise the intention is not a good one is it ?

https://su.figshare.com/articles/preprint/Fertility_declines_near_the_end_of_the_COVID-19_pandemic_Evidence_of_the_2022_birth_declines_in_Germany_and_Sweden/20975611

''there is a strong association between the onset of vaccination programmes and the fertility decline nine months after of this onset. The fertility decline in the first months of 2022 in Germany and Sweden is remarkable.''

Expand full comment

I think the calculation around 16:30 is in error. Fenton has previously blogged about this calculation:

https://probabilityandlaw.blogspot.com/2021/05/important-caveats-to-pfizer-vaccine.html

If I understand correctly, his calculations estimating the overall testing rates in the vaccinated versus unvaccinated in that Israel study seem to equate a particular subgroup of "vaccinated and tested people" with *all* "vaccinated and tested people".

In any case, I would think it would be easy for the study authors to report the total PCR counts in vaccinated versus unvaccinated, which they did not. Their COI's probably explain why.

Good to see this substack starting. There is sure to be a lot more engagement.

Expand full comment
author

David: The problem is that the Lancet paper did not provide the explicit numbers and I think what we did was a reasonable estimate based on the information they did provide

Expand full comment

The production facility BNT then purchased was the Behringwerke in Marburg. The Behringwerke was previously owned by IG Farben: the conglomerate that produced the Zyklon B used to exterminate Jews at Auschwitz. The Behringwerke and the experimental vaccine program were at the center of the first Nuremberg trial or "Doctors Trial" that gave rise to the Nuremberg Code.

https://twitter.com/EdV1694/status/1538530338384883712?s=20&t=Zt37Yp8a-YvYAzysApjPRA

Expand full comment
author

I thought history rhymed but never repeated but I must be wrong. You'd think their PR advisors might have picked up on this unfortunate coincidence(?)

Martin

Expand full comment

A lot of the modelling papers that I've read are total garbage. After seeing justifications of the reproduction rate in the Kermack-McKendrick as proportional to the probability that an individual is susceptible - a probability also valid for exponential growth - I decided to make my own model.

Game of tag anyone? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XhlR6lVSZoo

Expand full comment

“Totalitarian propaganda establishes a world fit to compete with the real one, whose main handicap is that it is not logical, consistent, and organized.” - Hannah Arendt

Once you get people to assent to a world that makes no sense you can get them to do anything. That's precisely what the Covid Cult is: it competes with the real world. Strategy of tension, mass mind manipulation, a psychological operation, the general population hypnotised right in front of your eyes.

Covid-19 is the biggest money laundering/racketeering scheme in the history of this country.

99% of people falsely certified as having ‘died from covid’ actually died from their preexisting conditions being exacerbated by mass medical malpractice and ‘public health’ despotism, the other 1% simply died of old age.

From the CDC itself 7/16/21:

“Of the 540,667 hospitalized coronavirus patients included in the study, 80,174 died during the observation period (March 2020 to March 2021). A whopping 99.1% of the patients who died had at least one pre-existing condition, with just 740 having no prior condition on record. Most patients who "died from COVID" had multiple pre-existing conditions, with just 2.6% suffering from only one condition, compared to 32.3% who had two to five preexisting conditions, 39.1% who had six to ten, and 25.1% who have more than ten pre-existing conditions.”

Translation: No one has "died from Covid" as “Covid” is nothing more than a fraudulent PCR result plus a nebulous clinical re-branding of cold, “flu” and many other disease conditions.

Article from Feb. 2020:

“What exactly counts as a Covid-19 death?”

To fully understand what a Covid death is- and what it isn’t- it is essential to understand the radical, and to this day unexplained, changes made in how deaths would be recorded, starting in the Spring of 2020. For the last two decades, standardized cataloging of mortality statistics has been in place, as outlined in the CDC’s Medical Examiners’ & Coroners’ Handbook on Death Registration and Fetal Death Reporting and the CDC’s Physicians’ Handbook on Medical Certification of Death.

The arrival of Covid-19 would usher in a new manner of recording mortality.

On March 24th, 2020, the National Vital Statistics System (NVSS), under the direction of the CDC, issued ‘COVID-19 Alert No. 2’ to all physicians, medical examiners, and coroners as a guideline as to ‘how cause of death’ would now be reported on death certificates, exclusively for COVID-19.

https://healthfreedomdefense.org/counting-covid-deaths/

Expand full comment

Your conclusion that 'covid is nothing but a fraudulent pcr test' provides no explanation for the thousands of results confirming we observe a novel Gain-of-Function virus with nasty engineered epitopes.

Expand full comment

The fact that there is apparently no live isolate is very troubling especially cuss so many got and or died from it! Good old RT PCR test! So many need jail or worse!

Expand full comment

Sarah Kayat ANOTHER fraud cocaine addict ''doctor'' same with Amir Khan and others !! Sick sick individuals completely unable to accurately interpret drug trial data. Shocking !!

Expand full comment

CBDC's are integral in their C40 cities. Please read all the way to the end and review the 'consumptive interventions' planned in the c40 cities. You can search your country and city on the first data base/ website link. Learn about what a c40 city is. These organizations seem to link together. The Most Important link at the below. Please download as an attachment for your thorough consideration and spread the word intensively. https://www.globalcovenantofmayors.org/our-cities/ https://www.c40.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/2270_C40_CBE_MainReport_250719.original.pdf Every single city that is involved in this initiative the entire planet is listed. Do you know which cities are involved? But do you know they have a target about how much meat you should eat in C40 Cities? (hint by 2030 NONE. Go through the tables in the link and attachment for yourself) How many new clothes you can buy? hint: 3 a year is the aggressive target. Each link is searchable. Read to the end. Consider closely the consumption mitigation or intervention strategies. Personal Auto ownership? Yes. Vins governed. Your food? decided. Even the search terms are spooky; "our mayors" or "our cities" GLOBAL COVENANT OF MAYORS FOR CLIMATE AND ENERGY https://www.globalcovenantofmayors.org/our-cities/ search your city. Find out if its there. Notice anything about the cities missing. red states/blue states. By the time you read and consider all of this, those are the cities you'll want to move to. Think also that this is just slavery. NOW how? through FINANCIAL CONTROLS. What controls? CBDC. TAKE OUT CASH for your transactions all the time now. screw the points. screw the nudging you away from freedom. Has anyone heard of this? shouldn't we understand how they want to regulate the 'goods and services' consumed in their cities as it relates to climate change? This is also known as consumption mitigation and intervention strategies and involves food you eat/ energy/ clothes you're allowed to purchase. (explore c40 website, you'll see what initiatives, which companies support this!!!) As an aside how would the Strong Mayors Act in Ontario recently passed fit in with this? Since Mayor Tory is one of "our mayors". Are there new Strong mayor legislations happening in your state? look they haven't brainwashed everyone on burgers. and how about pets? if you get 0kg of meat. do you think you keep your pets. USE THESE TWO THINGS TO WEDGE OPEN PEOPLES BRAINS. they're coming for fido and the cheeseburger HARD. and refuse digital id and digital currency or go that way. https://www.globalcovenantofmayors.org/our-cities/ search your city. Find out if it's there. But move to C40 the more aggressive brand to truly see what a C40 city is. C40 https://www.c40.org/about-c40/ https://www.c40.org/news/statement-by-the-c40-cities-steering-committee/ The commitment of our 97 cities representing 700 million residents to the Leadership Standards demonstrates the resolve of the world’s mayors to deliver the urgent action needed to tackle the climate crisis. In this unprecedented moment in human history, we know that we must act without hesitation to save our planet and create a more equitable, prosperous, and healthy future for our children and grandchildren. In the crucial years ahead, these Leadership Standards set us on a path to achieve a zero-carbon future, build meaningful and broad coalitions, and set a global model for cities around the world to follow suit. This work is grounded in the principles of the Global Green New Deal as the cornerstone of a green and just recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic and the foundation of global efforts to address the climate emergency. C40 Leadership Standards 2021-2024: "Plan. City has adopted a resilient and inclusive climate action plan aligned with the 1.5˚C ambition of the Paris Agreement, and updates it regularly; Deliver. In 2024, city remains on track to deliver its climate action plan, contributing to increased resilience, equitable outcomes and halving C40’s overall emissions by 2030; Mainstream. City uses the necessary FINANCIAL!!!!!!(MY EMPHASIS) regulatory and other tools at their disposal to address the climate crisis and mainstreams their equitable climate targets into the most impactful city decision-making processes; Innovate. City innovates and starts taking inclusive and resilient action to address emissions beyond the direct control of the city government, such as associated with goods and services consumed in their city; Lead. Mayor and the city demonstrate global climate leadership and inspire others to act in support of the Paris Agreement. These Leadership Standards will guide our collective action until at least 2024." did you know that c40 wants you to have 3 new articles of clothing; look at the life of the car; how much meat by 2030 you can eat in a C40 city (0kg on the aggressive target- you've got to dig in and understand this is an agenda that has you on a leash!) But who are the people that think you under their thumb to the point of food/car/flight/clothing consumption.. is theirs to control. Does it remind you of anything at all. What does it make you think of when you review this. Fedex likes and supports this. You can search which companies are involved in supporting this. Decide if they deserve your business. Is Post Media covering this? https://www.c40.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/2270_C40_CBE_MainReport_250719.original.pdf Look at the tables for 'consumptive interventions'; Table 6 for instance tells you that these c40 cities believe they can dictate how many flights you should be able to have by 2030; Table 6.6.1? how many people can own vehicles; There's a table for how many kg of meat you can eat in these c40 cities. Aggressive target? 0kg. 2030 is 7 years away. Do you have a kid? a grand kid? should they taste burgers? or no. It's their mitt year this year? or will you get them underwear. We need a revolt on this absurdity. Please use your platform to get this to every city politician, state politician, federal politician. Thank-you.

Expand full comment

The original, generations-long definition of “vaccine” must be taken back in 2023.

Expand full comment

Wa ha ha, the symphony of decreasing numbers was totally brilliant, I laughed like crazy. As soon as the "mediatic crisis" began, the inconsistencies befan. There was the famous retracted paper of the Indian team who claimed they had found a strange HIV like sequence insertion, then Dr. Montagnier said the same thing on French TV, then the young Chinese woman who said it was a lab engineered virus, at about that time the superb team of Daszak, Zheng-Li and Baric took the stage and did a great show, and all that time the usual prophylaxis never showed up, the CDC changed the definition of pandemic, doctors started to speak out against, others said long term was dead because this was a new technology... WHAT??? Serious side effects began appearing, I couldn't visit my 93 y/o mom, I felt like a criminal, then I saw Burla say the first two shots were useless, the disappeared liability, the contradictions, the restrictions, and still doctors were saying long term? What long term? AHHHH, COULD SOMEONE PLEASE EXPLAIN HOW THEY GOT RID OF THE VACCINE CAUSED CYTOKINE STORMS THAT KILLED 8 KIDS IN THE 60s????

Expand full comment

The truth will prevail

Expand full comment

Almost 80...I pray that I live long enough to see Fauci and others in prison or worse!

Expand full comment