I recently provided the following statement to support a case concerned with informed consent relevant to the vaccination and masking of children and young adults. I can confirm, based on my own and close colleagues’ research since March 2020, the following relevant to <the case>:
It was known from the beginning that the disease called ‘Covid’ was of little or no threat to the general population.
Why was there a ‘vaccine solution’ for the population at large?
I raised this matter in a BMJ rapid response published in March 2020, asking ‘Is it ethical to impede access to natural immunity? The Case of SARS-CoV2’[1], and also in emails to Andrew Pollard, Chair of the UK Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI), and Chief Investigator on the Oxford/AstraZeneca Covid-19 vaccine trials[2]; and emails to Patrick Vallance and Chris Whitty, UK scientific and medical advisers.[3]
phrase of consent permission granted in “full knowledge” of the possible consequences, typically that which is given by a patient to a doctor for treatment with knowledge of the possible risks and benefits.
"written informed consent was obtained from each patient"
Do not think people were given any such information “before” any vaccination.
My brother was given a tiny piece of paper AFTER he was jabbed on both occasions...the protocols are being twisted around... imagine being given the Miranda warning at a police station after you have given a full statement ... it’s too late to withhold consent.
Many thanks for the huge amount of work that must have gone in to that article. Well written, properly referenced, with great data to back up everything you say. That's how we know you are telling the truth unlike everything you hear in the MSM, which has no references and no data but they are of course completely certain!
Sep 9, 2023·edited Sep 9, 2023Liked by Martin Neil, Norman Fenton
"Manufactured consent" is more like it. And that's if there was even any pretense of consent at all. (Alas, even Noam Chomsky himself, who coined the term, had long since sold out in that regard.)
What a good article. Really needs to be published by the BBC so that all the unaware would learn how bad it has all been, and still is. Sadly, it's not going to be picked up by the mainstream media is it?
Norman, so sorry about your wife's condition. We had a close friend whose Parkinson's was, she believed, accelerated by the shot(s) that her children essentially forced her to get. Of course, it would be too painful for them to admit or even entertain that thought. She is with God now and her struggles are over.
We have another, younger, friend who keeps himself in good shape and was recently diagnosed with Parkinson's which seems to be progressing rapidly. His mother has it and has been living with it for quite awhile. Since there is a family history they won't entertain (to our knowledge) that the shots have anything to do with it.
That is the insidious nature of the effects of these shots - they exacerbate existing issues or exploit existing weaknesses. If someone, say Jimmy Buffet for example, already has some form of cancer and takes the shot then has sudden progression and death, it will not likely be attributed to damage inflicted by the shot.
Fantastic! If ever there was a reason to support a Substacker, this is it--I'm subscribing. What a tremendous amount of work this was, and summarized brilliantly. As a 30+ year pharma/biotech career person IN THE REGULATORY APPROVAL space (!), I watched in disbelief as each of my intelligent colleagues discarded their long-held cautious views and regulatory spidey-senses when it came to the COVID vaccines. They eventually ostracized me as a pariah who didn't know any better; the workplace (even through Zoom) became unbearable and I was forced to retire early just to save my sanity. This summary tells me I was right to trust my instincts--along with all of us brave individuals who also did. Keep up the great work!!
This is so useful, to have all the information collated into one succinct piece-think you.
There was never any informed consent, only blind trust intentionally manufactured through 24/7 fear propaganda and removal of liberties.
How are heads not rolling for the endlessly peddled lie at the time that there was informed consent?
Wow. You knocked it out of the park with this. Many thanks.
It was known from the beginning that the disease called ‘Covid’ was of little or no threat to the general population.
Why was there a ‘vaccine solution’ for the population at large?
I raised this matter in a BMJ rapid response published in March 2020, asking ‘Is it ethical to impede access to natural immunity? The Case of SARS-CoV2’[1], and also in emails to Andrew Pollard, Chair of the UK Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI), and Chief Investigator on the Oxford/AstraZeneca Covid-19 vaccine trials[2]; and emails to Patrick Vallance and Chris Whitty, UK scientific and medical advisers.[3]
1. https://www.bmj.com/content/368/bmj.m1089/rr-6
2.
- Why are people not at risk of covid-19 being pressed to have covid-19 injections? 17 August 2021: https://vaccinationispolitical.files.wordpress.com/2021/08/why-are-people-not-at-risk-of-covid-19-being-pressed-to-have-covid-19-injections.pdf
- Who initiated the plan to vaccinate the entire global population against SARS- CoV-2? 30 June 2021: https://vaccinationispolitical.files.wordpress.com/2021/06/who-initiated-the-plan-to-vaccinate-the-entire-global-population-against-sars-cov-2.pdf
3.
- Reckless and grossly irresponsible response to covid-19 - the UK in the thick of it. 28 July 2021: https://vaccinationispolitical.files.wordpress.com/2021/06/who-initiated-the-plan-to-vaccinate-the-entire-global-population-against-sars-cov-2.pdf
- The reaction to the SARS-CoV-2 virus is the most reckless and grossly irresponsible 'public health' response in history. 6 April 2021: https://vaccinationispolitical.files.wordpress.com/2021/04/sars-cov-2-virus-the-most-reckless-and-grossly-irresponsible-response.pdf
Thank you. Not just for this (which is excellent) but for your courage and integrity.
I too have been collecting reasons not to get injected https://substack.com/@garysharpe/note/c-39637184
Definition of informed consent...
phrase of consent permission granted in “full knowledge” of the possible consequences, typically that which is given by a patient to a doctor for treatment with knowledge of the possible risks and benefits.
"written informed consent was obtained from each patient"
Do not think people were given any such information “before” any vaccination.
My brother was given a tiny piece of paper AFTER he was jabbed on both occasions...the protocols are being twisted around... imagine being given the Miranda warning at a police station after you have given a full statement ... it’s too late to withhold consent.
They simply just don’t want to let the truth come out. We’ve been living in very strange and dark times.
Excellent reference resource. Bookmarking it now
Amazing,, everything in one place, great work.
I recommend people share this with their Politicians, Ministers, and Medics to simplify there lives and provide accurate information.
Many thanks for the huge amount of work that must have gone in to that article. Well written, properly referenced, with great data to back up everything you say. That's how we know you are telling the truth unlike everything you hear in the MSM, which has no references and no data but they are of course completely certain!
"Manufactured consent" is more like it. And that's if there was even any pretense of consent at all. (Alas, even Noam Chomsky himself, who coined the term, had long since sold out in that regard.)
What a good article. Really needs to be published by the BBC so that all the unaware would learn how bad it has all been, and still is. Sadly, it's not going to be picked up by the mainstream media is it?
Excellent work. el Professori!
Not just emeritus by meritus!
Should be available as evidence in trail proceedings globally.
You are a true servant of humanity.
Norman, so sorry about your wife's condition. We had a close friend whose Parkinson's was, she believed, accelerated by the shot(s) that her children essentially forced her to get. Of course, it would be too painful for them to admit or even entertain that thought. She is with God now and her struggles are over.
We have another, younger, friend who keeps himself in good shape and was recently diagnosed with Parkinson's which seems to be progressing rapidly. His mother has it and has been living with it for quite awhile. Since there is a family history they won't entertain (to our knowledge) that the shots have anything to do with it.
That is the insidious nature of the effects of these shots - they exacerbate existing issues or exploit existing weaknesses. If someone, say Jimmy Buffet for example, already has some form of cancer and takes the shot then has sudden progression and death, it will not likely be attributed to damage inflicted by the shot.
Fantastic! If ever there was a reason to support a Substacker, this is it--I'm subscribing. What a tremendous amount of work this was, and summarized brilliantly. As a 30+ year pharma/biotech career person IN THE REGULATORY APPROVAL space (!), I watched in disbelief as each of my intelligent colleagues discarded their long-held cautious views and regulatory spidey-senses when it came to the COVID vaccines. They eventually ostracized me as a pariah who didn't know any better; the workplace (even through Zoom) became unbearable and I was forced to retire early just to save my sanity. This summary tells me I was right to trust my instincts--along with all of us brave individuals who also did. Keep up the great work!!