It is not about real scientific findings with true data to prove the validity of the findings. It is sadly about paid research to sway a particular point or agenda.
And also, even if it were the case that <there is no greater risk of developing heart inflammation after a Covid-19 vaccine than after other common vaccines, including the flu jab > it would be an unequivocal acknowledgment that vaccines can cause serious harm which often outweigh benefit. In which case, surely the BHF should be campaigning against the indiscriminate use of all vaccines rather than justifying the use of the Covid jab because they’re no worse than other equally dangerous products?
Yes, it's very similar to the tricks played by bigpharma when after robust trials they announce that the new vaccine is as safe as the placebo administered to the other cohort. This instills confidence - but what they don't tell you is that the placebo is very often just the old vaccine!
Thanks to the Israeli authors of "Turtles All the Way Down".
Between these and the EcoHealth Alliance appeal letters of the now fired Peter Daszak, the Lancet seems to be struggling to publish information that isn't rife with conflicts of interest.
💉Wow, absolutely disgusting. In this interview of a young Australian man with myocarditis, pharmacologist Dr Phillip Altman quotes a leading Sydney-based cardiologist who admitted to treating 100 cases of myocarditis caused by the Covid mRNA vaccine (to June 2023). There are more than a thousand practising cardiologists in Australia. If each of them had just 10 of these particular patients, we'd obviously be looking at around 10,000 cases of symptomatic myocarditis (in a population of 27 million). ⬇️
Similarly, 7 out of 9 doctors I saw for the shot injury know about the shots causing injuries. My ENT thinks it’s neurological. The increase in patients led them to this conclusion. The doctors are annoyed as they were given no guidance. If all of these doctors are seeing harmed patients, why has nothing been done? How can they continue to bury the injuries? This is totally unexplainable.
Thank you for this information. Many of the doctors took the shot themselves, so perhaps it’s partly an ongoing cognitive dissonance problem. If all mRNA jab mandates end, then the technology as a vaccine will eventually wind up I think, because no one in their right mind will want any.
Twenty five years ago, when I was a practicing physician, I dropped my subscriptions to JAMA and NEJM, because I noticed that the conclusions were not aligning with the results. This was before researchers had to reveal conflicts of interest. I looked up the various researchers of these idiotic conclusions and found that they were all getting money from Pharma or another health care entity that had a vested interest in the conclusion. As RFK has stated many times, this is a type of regulatory capture. I noticed this twenty five years ago and the vested interests have been busy in that twenty five years, spreading their money and influence. It has reached the point where EVERY major scientific journal is captured by vested interests. It also has reached the point where they not only draw ridiculously false and biased conclusions, but even fake data, censor accurate research and promote propaganda.
Where is the accountability for these crimes. People have died. Parents have lost children. Hockey associations and schools and businesses set policies on this information.
"there is no greater risk of developing heart inflammation after a Covid-19 vaccine than after other common vaccines, including the flu jab" If so, then I must conclude that ALL vaccines are unsafe.
Adding on: The Lancet also needs to revisit and pull the paper that claims to have documented the first person-to-person transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in the U.S. The Chicago couple was NOT a case of person-to-person transmission.
The Lancet has reached the end of its rope, as have many other so-called prestigious scientific journals. If they admit now they were wrong about “safe and effective” covid-19 vaccines, or other vaccines, people may begin to wonder what else they could have been wrong about…
They realize that if covid-19 vaccine or other vaccine can of worms is allowed to be opened, other cans of stinky worms will follow where at the end of this lies scientism - their untouchable and infallible god. It is their religion of scientism they are trying to protect run by priests in white lab coats…
Hmmmmm could USA ID money have been used to "help" support this endlessly worthy cause, the Lancet magazine? Nah, that would be a wicked conspiracy theory;
I saw a video where it was stated by a health care professional that the new mRNA technology would be so simple. Simple as editing part of the virus 🦠 and replacing with the new virus genetic info. Bam 💥 New Vaccine.
From what I can tell… they are tripling down on this technology.
Lancet is corrupt just like so many others, facts speak for themselves. Crimes against humanity. I’m starting to believe everyone that says there not a problem with Covid jabs have been paid off. No other reason,
There was also the concern raised a while ago on GBNews that a researcher in Oxford said she'd been asked to withold information about cardiac adverse events as covered in this open letter. Needless to say no investigation followed https://www.hartgroup.org/joint-open-letter-to-charity-commission/
It is not about real scientific findings with true data to prove the validity of the findings. It is sadly about paid research to sway a particular point or agenda.
lookat aztrials big pay off to get indemnity must be
And also, even if it were the case that <there is no greater risk of developing heart inflammation after a Covid-19 vaccine than after other common vaccines, including the flu jab > it would be an unequivocal acknowledgment that vaccines can cause serious harm which often outweigh benefit. In which case, surely the BHF should be campaigning against the indiscriminate use of all vaccines rather than justifying the use of the Covid jab because they’re no worse than other equally dangerous products?
Yes, it's very similar to the tricks played by bigpharma when after robust trials they announce that the new vaccine is as safe as the placebo administered to the other cohort. This instills confidence - but what they don't tell you is that the placebo is very often just the old vaccine!
Thanks to the Israeli authors of "Turtles All the Way Down".
Between these and the EcoHealth Alliance appeal letters of the now fired Peter Daszak, the Lancet seems to be struggling to publish information that isn't rife with conflicts of interest.
youmean pharma payoff
''In April 2022 The Lancet published a paper by Ling et al which came to the following conclusion based on their own meta-analysis of earlier papers:
''There is no greater risk of developing heart inflammation after a Covid-19 vaccine than after other common vaccines, including the flu jab.''
That maybe true but front-line healthcare workers with lived experience shared the following so who do you trust on safety etc?
-17% of 1000 staff suffered a serious adverse event from a flu 'vaccination.'
-17% of 1400 staff suffered a serious adverse event from a COVID 'vaccination.'
-30% of 4,500 staff do not agree COVID 'vaccines' are safe and effective.
-During winter season 2023 around 70% of ALL healthcare workers in Scotland declined BOTH COVID-19 AND flu 'vaccinations'.
‘'Numbers of excess deaths and cardiac events is extremely concerning. Risk of vaccine is far higher than COVID.’'
-NHS Front-Line worker on COVID 'vaccination'
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/national-survey-of-healthcare-workers?utm_source=publication-search
To me, that means no jab is safe. It is all about the probability.
💉Wow, absolutely disgusting. In this interview of a young Australian man with myocarditis, pharmacologist Dr Phillip Altman quotes a leading Sydney-based cardiologist who admitted to treating 100 cases of myocarditis caused by the Covid mRNA vaccine (to June 2023). There are more than a thousand practising cardiologists in Australia. If each of them had just 10 of these particular patients, we'd obviously be looking at around 10,000 cases of symptomatic myocarditis (in a population of 27 million). ⬇️
https://open.substack.com/pub/phillipaltman/p/interview-with-a-myocarditis-victim?r=20pd6j&utm_medium=ios
Similarly, 7 out of 9 doctors I saw for the shot injury know about the shots causing injuries. My ENT thinks it’s neurological. The increase in patients led them to this conclusion. The doctors are annoyed as they were given no guidance. If all of these doctors are seeing harmed patients, why has nothing been done? How can they continue to bury the injuries? This is totally unexplainable.
Thank you for this information. Many of the doctors took the shot themselves, so perhaps it’s partly an ongoing cognitive dissonance problem. If all mRNA jab mandates end, then the technology as a vaccine will eventually wind up I think, because no one in their right mind will want any.
Except my 4 couple friends who will line up for their 9th when available.
Twenty five years ago, when I was a practicing physician, I dropped my subscriptions to JAMA and NEJM, because I noticed that the conclusions were not aligning with the results. This was before researchers had to reveal conflicts of interest. I looked up the various researchers of these idiotic conclusions and found that they were all getting money from Pharma or another health care entity that had a vested interest in the conclusion. As RFK has stated many times, this is a type of regulatory capture. I noticed this twenty five years ago and the vested interests have been busy in that twenty five years, spreading their money and influence. It has reached the point where EVERY major scientific journal is captured by vested interests. It also has reached the point where they not only draw ridiculously false and biased conclusions, but even fake data, censor accurate research and promote propaganda.
Where is the accountability for these crimes. People have died. Parents have lost children. Hockey associations and schools and businesses set policies on this information.
"there is no greater risk of developing heart inflammation after a Covid-19 vaccine than after other common vaccines, including the flu jab" If so, then I must conclude that ALL vaccines are unsafe.
Adding on: The Lancet also needs to revisit and pull the paper that claims to have documented the first person-to-person transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in the U.S. The Chicago couple was NOT a case of person-to-person transmission.
Lancet Editors did not respond to my 29 April 2022 email at all. (Email image in article: https://www.woodhouse76.com/p/questioning-the-first-known-person)
Without transmission claims, of course, no PHEIC, no pandemic declaration, and certainly no shot would've been possible.
Thank you for making this very important point.
You're welcome. It's been nothing but lies from the very start.
Also worth remembering that there was no evidence of human-to-human transmission, and then there was, because China said so...or something. https://www.woodhouse76.com/p/memory-lane-14-january-2020
Thank goodness for a TEST, right??? ;-)
Criminals.
The Lancet has reached the end of its rope, as have many other so-called prestigious scientific journals. If they admit now they were wrong about “safe and effective” covid-19 vaccines, or other vaccines, people may begin to wonder what else they could have been wrong about…
They realize that if covid-19 vaccine or other vaccine can of worms is allowed to be opened, other cans of stinky worms will follow where at the end of this lies scientism - their untouchable and infallible god. It is their religion of scientism they are trying to protect run by priests in white lab coats…
"flawed"? You guys are too kind.
Hmmmmm could USA ID money have been used to "help" support this endlessly worthy cause, the Lancet magazine? Nah, that would be a wicked conspiracy theory;
I saw a video where it was stated by a health care professional that the new mRNA technology would be so simple. Simple as editing part of the virus 🦠 and replacing with the new virus genetic info. Bam 💥 New Vaccine.
From what I can tell… they are tripling down on this technology.
Lancet is corrupt just like so many others, facts speak for themselves. Crimes against humanity. I’m starting to believe everyone that says there not a problem with Covid jabs have been paid off. No other reason,
Crimes against humanity even BEFORE any novel mRNA/DNA jabs were in arms?
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/newexclusiveannes-law-consultation?utm_source=publication-search
That’s how it went. Sickening. Medical freedom and all freedoms are gone. 🤬
Thankfully not gone for good, not yet.
🤞🤞🤞
There was also the concern raised a while ago on GBNews that a researcher in Oxford said she'd been asked to withold information about cardiac adverse events as covered in this open letter. Needless to say no investigation followed https://www.hartgroup.org/joint-open-letter-to-charity-commission/