I have written this before, but as a veterinary surgeon we have difficulty getting ventilation pressures right in our patients. It is easy to cause damage by high pressure and at the same time low pressures won’t get oxygen where it is needed. This is even more of a problem in damaged (infected) lungs.
But at the time I thought my esteemed colleagues in the human profession clearly were much better than we were....turns out they weren’t...
Early intervention was denied, media suppressed voices, tried and true options denied, informed choice squashed, hospitals took money for murder, doctors & nurses silent, crimes against humanity!
So, if I've understood this correctly, population wide ventilation was chosen as less likely to risk exposure to any subsequent litigation, regardless of the adverse consequences.
This whole covid/lockdown saga just gets better and better; who'd have guessed, before 2020, that well established public health standards, common sense, candour and respect for personal autonomy would have been consigned to the political lost and found, along with much of the world's economy, the crucial wellbeing of children,young adults ,the productive workforce ,social stability ,trust and freedom?
If China wanted to conduct hybrid warfare wouldn’t it make sense to use the contract to manufacture Pfizer vaccines to add adulterants and a SV promoter for good measure. Particularity ones that attacked the genome and caused cancers? Then despite vaccine production in China (by Fosun Pharmaceuticals) ensure the Chinese government bans the use of this product on Chinese citizens. This factual sequence of events should tell everyone there is something seriously wrong. around the entire COVID story. China also promoted the lockdowns and now the ventilators. Good grief if I didn’t know better it would appear as if we are under attack by China and from elements within western leadership.
I posted on the last article the NIH policy and ventilation wasn't the recommended treatment. NIH policy on ventilation for Covid is appropriate for healthcare settings. Both articles state that China was following US policy on ventilation without providing any evidence of it. I provided evidence of US policy. I decided to dig a little deeper on this and I found the W.H.O. policy on treating Covid. Taken directly from their policy. What makes it worse is the title of their guidance. Clinical management of severe acute respiratory infection (SARI) when COVID-19 disease is suspected. Not confirmed, just suspected. These are the people that want control of the entire worlds pandemic response.
Remark 1: Although the majority of people with COVID-19 have uncomplicated or mild illness (81%), some will develop severe illness requiring oxygen therapy (14%) and approximately 5% will require intensive care unit treatment. Of those critically ill, most will require mechanical ventilation (2, 10). The most common diagnosis in severe COVID-19 patients is severe pneumonia.
As I said last time, you will have to look at individual facilities and where they got their policies from to decide to do this. It wasn't the USA's national Covid policy to just put people on ventilator's. With all the players involved with China interests, W.H.O. interests and everything else going on. I am not quite sure what the intent is here. Someone purchased all the ventilators in the US government on bad information as well and got kick backs somewhere along the way.
They only used the ventilators on unvaccinated people so they drown in there own fluids...the vaccinated got ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine and left the hospital around 2 days later
I have written this before, but as a veterinary surgeon we have difficulty getting ventilation pressures right in our patients. It is easy to cause damage by high pressure and at the same time low pressures won’t get oxygen where it is needed. This is even more of a problem in damaged (infected) lungs.
But at the time I thought my esteemed colleagues in the human profession clearly were much better than we were....turns out they weren’t...
The ventilators were forced on people- and pure murder by many. I'll never forget the testimony of that nurse from Queens NY
Early intervention was denied, media suppressed voices, tried and true options denied, informed choice squashed, hospitals took money for murder, doctors & nurses silent, crimes against humanity!
So, if I've understood this correctly, population wide ventilation was chosen as less likely to risk exposure to any subsequent litigation, regardless of the adverse consequences.
This whole covid/lockdown saga just gets better and better; who'd have guessed, before 2020, that well established public health standards, common sense, candour and respect for personal autonomy would have been consigned to the political lost and found, along with much of the world's economy, the crucial wellbeing of children,young adults ,the productive workforce ,social stability ,trust and freedom?
If China wanted to conduct hybrid warfare wouldn’t it make sense to use the contract to manufacture Pfizer vaccines to add adulterants and a SV promoter for good measure. Particularity ones that attacked the genome and caused cancers? Then despite vaccine production in China (by Fosun Pharmaceuticals) ensure the Chinese government bans the use of this product on Chinese citizens. This factual sequence of events should tell everyone there is something seriously wrong. around the entire COVID story. China also promoted the lockdowns and now the ventilators. Good grief if I didn’t know better it would appear as if we are under attack by China and from elements within western leadership.
I posted on the last article the NIH policy and ventilation wasn't the recommended treatment. NIH policy on ventilation for Covid is appropriate for healthcare settings. Both articles state that China was following US policy on ventilation without providing any evidence of it. I provided evidence of US policy. I decided to dig a little deeper on this and I found the W.H.O. policy on treating Covid. Taken directly from their policy. What makes it worse is the title of their guidance. Clinical management of severe acute respiratory infection (SARI) when COVID-19 disease is suspected. Not confirmed, just suspected. These are the people that want control of the entire worlds pandemic response.
Remark 1: Although the majority of people with COVID-19 have uncomplicated or mild illness (81%), some will develop severe illness requiring oxygen therapy (14%) and approximately 5% will require intensive care unit treatment. Of those critically ill, most will require mechanical ventilation (2, 10). The most common diagnosis in severe COVID-19 patients is severe pneumonia.
As I said last time, you will have to look at individual facilities and where they got their policies from to decide to do this. It wasn't the USA's national Covid policy to just put people on ventilator's. With all the players involved with China interests, W.H.O. interests and everything else going on. I am not quite sure what the intent is here. Someone purchased all the ventilators in the US government on bad information as well and got kick backs somewhere along the way.
https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/clinical-management-of-novel-cov.pdf
They only used the ventilators on unvaccinated people so they drown in there own fluids...the vaccinated got ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine and left the hospital around 2 days later
Most of the dead by the ventilators was in Australia if im not mistaken
At least you’re finally not blaming China. They were smarter and did not use the mRNA vaccines