Earlier this week we described the bias in the BBC Radio 4 programme attacking the speech by MP Andrew Bridgen on covid vaccine risks and benefits. Dr Joseph Fraiman - the first named author of the study that Bridgen referred to in his speech - saw the article and sent this message to us:
Let the BBC continue being the government's mouthpiece and bitches to big pharma. Each week fewer and fewer people listen to their radio stations or watch their TV programs. As someone said on here the other day, " the only way to make an effective complaint is cancel the television licence fee".
RFK Jr is suing the BBC over its 'Trusted News Initiative' campaign which is basically a conspiracy by the big MSM operators and Big Tech social media to censor and boycott independent news outlets in order to promote the official narrative on vaccines and Covid vaccines in particular. The claim is that the BBC has violated anti-trust laws. I hope his case succeeds. It's way past time that the BBC were taken down a peg or two; they have become far too big for their boots. They violate their own charter with impunity, yet the government still refuses to abolish the licence fee - most likely because the BBC now act as the government's propaganda mouthpiece.
This is so sad. Espescailly the use of Jews in this campaign makes me sad and angry. Harari made Israel burn, and he faces no responsibility, while media targets Briden and Netanyahu. Not fair.
These guys double-down when wrong and hope no one calls them out. To go with that back-of-the-napkin calculation, here's a "back-of-the-table-cloth" one:
Given how the BBC used to talk about balance in debate this is the most appalling example of the BBC as the mouthpiece of vested interest propaganda. This has killed people and continues to kill people for no benefit. That 1 in 800 seems ball-park for analyses in many countries over the last two years. I see Aseem Malhotra being bashed on Twitter again and again with the question - why doesn't the GMC strike him off? My guess is that the GMC know the truth and if there was a court case the data would be fully debated and the truth revealed, which the GMC would prefer not to expose.
My wife and I have stopped watching or listening to the BBC because of the clear bias in their reporting. and their failure to carry out any investigative journalism. Actually, when I was still viewing I complained using their complaints procedure---no point ,of course, so we have just switched off.
A couple of years ago, the then Sect of State for Health claimed that the jabs had saved 76,000 lives. What was the proof of that? They had taken the daily average all-mortality rate and extrapolated for a year, then subtracted the actual number who had actually died. The result was a 76000 drop. In the scale of things, neither unusual nor dramatic, but then claimed the jabs had saved that number of lives, without any evidence. Pfffft!!
I wouldn't bother writing a letter to an MP but I would recommend posting on their twitter page. Just write ,"As one of your consituents I do not support [ insert issue here]". No need for any explanation.
This story goes from bad to worse. I don't know what can be done about the BBC - it needs totally clearing out and restarting and that's not going to happen is it? The BBC, like the Guardian and the NYT, have been completely captured by the strange New Thinkers with their flexible relationship with the truth. The govt doesn't mind because the Beeb is dependent on it for it's existence. The public will carry on paying their licence and watching all the rubbish on TV and believing what those nice BBC presenters tell them. A handful of people not paying their licence makes no difference. Just like a handful of people writing angy letters to their MPs makes no difference (I did it for years - quite pointless). Probably it's time to get the pitchforks out, get angry and start behaving like the French (yeah, I know - not how the Brits behave).
I write to OFCOM every now and then when I think a MSM outlet has been untruthful or biased or just down right wrong in their reporting. This appears to come under the “down right wrong” category.
Let the BBC continue being the government's mouthpiece and bitches to big pharma. Each week fewer and fewer people listen to their radio stations or watch their TV programs. As someone said on here the other day, " the only way to make an effective complaint is cancel the television licence fee".
RFK Jr is suing the BBC over its 'Trusted News Initiative' campaign which is basically a conspiracy by the big MSM operators and Big Tech social media to censor and boycott independent news outlets in order to promote the official narrative on vaccines and Covid vaccines in particular. The claim is that the BBC has violated anti-trust laws. I hope his case succeeds. It's way past time that the BBC were taken down a peg or two; they have become far too big for their boots. They violate their own charter with impunity, yet the government still refuses to abolish the licence fee - most likely because the BBC now act as the government's propaganda mouthpiece.
Government minister says the vaccines saved tens of thousands of lives: Pure Soviet tractor stats.
This is so sad. Espescailly the use of Jews in this campaign makes me sad and angry. Harari made Israel burn, and he faces no responsibility, while media targets Briden and Netanyahu. Not fair.
Of course if we find some of the Excess Deaths are actually attributable to the jab then the claimed lives saved become rather negative!
Thank you (the authors) for this article, thank you MP Bridgen, thank you Dr Fraiman,and thank you Dr Campbell for the truth.
These guys double-down when wrong and hope no one calls them out. To go with that back-of-the-napkin calculation, here's a "back-of-the-table-cloth" one:
https://deepd1ve.substack.com/p/new-phenomenon-easily-debunkable
Given how the BBC used to talk about balance in debate this is the most appalling example of the BBC as the mouthpiece of vested interest propaganda. This has killed people and continues to kill people for no benefit. That 1 in 800 seems ball-park for analyses in many countries over the last two years. I see Aseem Malhotra being bashed on Twitter again and again with the question - why doesn't the GMC strike him off? My guess is that the GMC know the truth and if there was a court case the data would be fully debated and the truth revealed, which the GMC would prefer not to expose.
He needs a math lesson or two, lol. Plus love "ransomized trials" left in. It's the only thing that's accurate.
My wife and I have stopped watching or listening to the BBC because of the clear bias in their reporting. and their failure to carry out any investigative journalism. Actually, when I was still viewing I complained using their complaints procedure---no point ,of course, so we have just switched off.
A couple of years ago, the then Sect of State for Health claimed that the jabs had saved 76,000 lives. What was the proof of that? They had taken the daily average all-mortality rate and extrapolated for a year, then subtracted the actual number who had actually died. The result was a 76000 drop. In the scale of things, neither unusual nor dramatic, but then claimed the jabs had saved that number of lives, without any evidence. Pfffft!!
The BBC and the Health Minister should heed the old adage "stop digging when you are in a hole".
I wouldn't bother writing a letter to an MP but I would recommend posting on their twitter page. Just write ,"As one of your consituents I do not support [ insert issue here]". No need for any explanation.
Well done Norman et al. I never imagined this response.
This story goes from bad to worse. I don't know what can be done about the BBC - it needs totally clearing out and restarting and that's not going to happen is it? The BBC, like the Guardian and the NYT, have been completely captured by the strange New Thinkers with their flexible relationship with the truth. The govt doesn't mind because the Beeb is dependent on it for it's existence. The public will carry on paying their licence and watching all the rubbish on TV and believing what those nice BBC presenters tell them. A handful of people not paying their licence makes no difference. Just like a handful of people writing angy letters to their MPs makes no difference (I did it for years - quite pointless). Probably it's time to get the pitchforks out, get angry and start behaving like the French (yeah, I know - not how the Brits behave).
I write to OFCOM every now and then when I think a MSM outlet has been untruthful or biased or just down right wrong in their reporting. This appears to come under the “down right wrong” category.