39 Comments
Apr 24, 2023Liked by Martin Neil

Thank you for this Norman, will give it a watch now.

May I also alert you (if you're not already aware) to this talk by both Kate Bingham and June Raine, which is one of the most alarming things I've watched in the past year — https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xUQfzTqPUm4 [Raine starts at approx 30mins, and her presentation is unironically titled "From Watchdog to Enabler - Regulation in Covid and after"]

There is so much that is alarming in that talk, such as gems (horrors?) like: "We tore up the rulebook...". Excellent. Well, I mean it's not like we have the rule book for a reason or anything. It's not like we developed a bl**dy rule book because without one you can accidentally kill a lot of people FFS.

She notes that they knew that they could really only see risk and benefit once it's been rolled out, and that they were expecting a vast influx of reports of side effects. Well I would put to June that another way to get a grasp of the risk and benefit *before* roll out might be to conduct quality trials of a decent length, but perhaps I'm just a rube who doesn't properly understand how all this is supposed to work.

Next she shows the table of "parallel working" (ie not doing things in proper order) and she says "that can never be turned back now"... yes, because they want to use this accelerated pathway for all approvals going forward... great news.

Speaking about all the phases happening concurrently, she says "By the time we were able to look at the interim analysis, that was so exciting, we actually knew we were very close to an approval."

... Erm, lady, what? — How could you be almost at the point of approval WITHOUT even seeing the interim analysis? ...what if it was awful?

These people are dangerous muppets, and the self-congratulatory smugness with which she regales us of these horrors only makes it worse. She was given a Damehood for throwing all the safety guardrails into the nearest bin! No wonder she's smug.

Expand full comment
Apr 24, 2023Liked by Norman Fenton

Disgusting that these people are not acting in the public interest.

Even if their funding came from the public they would still be loyal to their former pharma masters.

Truly how can this have been allowed to have happened?

Expand full comment

Dr June Raine has a stunning ability to come across as completely normal when we are witnessing health product regulation for the nation being reduced to ashes. There are some more revelations to come out on my substack about the MHRA within a week or two, should be spicy! I haven't heard back from Perseus Group but remain hopeful. Hope my work fits their needs. Cheers Norman for this breathtaking video.

Expand full comment
Apr 24, 2023Liked by Norman Fenton

What a disgusting presentation by a posh hypocrite. Truly shocking stuff. All the revelations should have taken these poisons off the market.

Expand full comment

As communications (media) continue their rapid decentralization, away from government control, these government controlled institutions and agencies will lose what little credibility they have left. Apparently they do not see the rapidly approaching demise of their influence and authority. The gig is almost up.

Expand full comment

This is a truly shocking post. The MHRA has an appalling record as regards the approval of and the monitoring of the safety of the Covid vaccines. They didn't even bother to analyse the Pfizer clinical trial data prior to approval and when questioned, they claimed that PHE had done it, which PHE denied. It seems fairly obvious that June Raine and the MHRA have put public safety last and the corporate interests of Big Pharma first and in the process, have inflicted severe injury and death upon hundreds of thousands of people.

Expand full comment
Apr 24, 2023Liked by Norman Fenton

What a great post: your critique was devastating. I watched the video and could not believe what I was seeing and hearing when June Raine was presenting her report. I was struggling to recollect where I had seen a similar manner of presentation, and then it came to me: it was a headmistress reporting to a parent and teacher management board!

Expand full comment
Apr 24, 2023·edited Apr 24, 2023

It staggers me, far far removed from the cauldron of mendacity that warms this part of the public sector, that this horrendously condescending example of a "First Division" Civil Servant type can imagine that the serial bollux she spouts will not be noticed. FFS , she is bl***dy dangerous!!

It serves to put another nail in the coffin of the reputation of the UK public sector and its value to people. The Perseus report is just one of a ton of evidence that medicines regulatory agencies have used the populations they serve - hahaha - as some kind of guinea pig; have trampled established medical regulatory protocols ( I gather not entirely perfect but at the very least enabling a Safety Board to pull a drug which killed, say, people in the jabbed cohort less than 3 figures)

Raine reminds me of a guest presenter on Jackanory telling a tall tale to a group of children in syrupy tones - a fantasy tale designed to excite young children.....Jackanory vs CV19 EUA for experimental GT drugs that we all now know were ineffective, lethally and morbidly dangerous, with a massive list of adverse effects - and all this was known before she pressed the "Yes" button - what's is the difference?.

I am a serious anaphylaxis sufferer; two episodes , one extremely close to being fatal; the fact that the Pfizer documents released in the US as well as the US Justice department 552 pages of disclosures shred what she spouts means that she is either so deluded as to be not first for purpose or so deeply embedded with BigPharma as to be incapable of delivering her (former) drug regulatory role. I would love to be locked in a room with her to inform her of the consequences of her ignoring the lack of depth of the trials of these drugs, and also to ask her to explain how she could state that no shortcuts were taken to approve these experimental GT drugs that she must have known ( because , eg, Pfizer knew ) did not work - she would have one chance such that if she lied the trapdoor to hell would spring ....We in the UK are in very serious trouble not least because she is "in post"....all imho of course.

Expand full comment

All facets of government serve one purpose - more government.

Expand full comment

The MHRA is now UK’s Branch of the Pharmaceutical Industrial Complex Cartel

Expand full comment

Thank you Norman for yet another fabulous piece. This made me realise that a meme with 2 column table - name and the % of non-taxpayer funding - for the WHO, MHRA, FDA, CDC, UN? etc. (perhaps 5 "NGO"s) might get the message out to a broader audience still. The numbers are so shocking - up in the 80s - they chisel away even at the most defensive. Should your team have time in its packed schedule. Would be pleased to send on its way into the Telegram ether.

Expand full comment

No one should be taking any vaccine or giving them to your kids.

The MHRA, JCVI and regulators worldwide are compromised/bribed/rogue and are under control of the WHO, WEF, UN etc and still trying to push these lethal mRNA vaccines as a means for biomedical control with vaccine passports.

They will be back with scamdemic 2 and more lethal mRNA vaccines you can bet on it.

Expand full comment

Raine demonstrates so well the banality of evil.

Expand full comment

.

Dial-Up Modem:

If You Hold Your Phone

Next To A Heavily Vaccinated Tool

You Can Hear The AOL Dial-Up Sound/ Squawk.

Press #911

To Call Them An Ambulance.

Charges May Apply.

.

Expand full comment

Great expose`.

June Raine in the UK shows that we've come a long way from Dr. Herbert L. Ley, Jr. in the USA who, due to regulatory capture of the FDA by the late 1960s, was pushed out as the head of the FDA:

https://www.nytimes.com/1969/12/12/archives/dr-ley-leaving-us-service-today-ousted-fda-commissioner-rejects.html

Expand full comment

Let’s play “Question and answer” or, Riddle Me This for a moment, shall we? Good.

Why, oh, why, would so-called Regulators be willing and insistent upon allowing the Unsafe denigration of all that protected us well from poisons etc for so long? Being human, they are subject to the risk of Bad Medicines. Or are they?

And how do they consider themselves safe from chemtrail poisons?

Only the study of psychopathy may hold the answer. Or the “afraid of death” elitists have got it covered somehow. Thoughts appreciated!

Expand full comment