What is the point of industry-funded ‘regulators’ such as the MHRA, FDA and TGA, which appear to be facilitators for exploiting mass populations with highly questionable products?
Wouldn’t we be much better off without these rogue ‘regulators’, and instead rely on ‘buyer beware’?
I decided in 2020 that I was never going to take another vaccine again in my life, and try to avoid any NHS treatments if at all possible, trying alternative medicine and remedies.
I have lost all trust and faith in health"care", the government and the International bodies such as the WHO, UN etc etc
I will also refuse a digital ID and CBDCs, no matter what the consequences.
Jun 10, 2023·edited Jun 10, 2023Liked by Norman Fenton
Some suspect squalene in anthrax shots was responsible for Gulf War Syndrome. There was some evidence of dose tolerance testing in the vaccine contents and people with the syndrome tested positive for squalene antibodies. This was detailed in a book called Vaccine A.
Detergent is another adjuvant that has been added to the mix in another covid "vaccine". How many more bizarre substances can they get people to accept being injected into their bodies!!
More points to note about Skycovione: 1) the phase III data is only published as an abstract currently (just days ago https://www.ijidonline.com/article/S1201-9712(23)00473-3/pdf). Two doses, 4 weeks apart, data presented to timepoint 2 weeks after second dose only. And if they are censoring the outcomes using the CDC-recommended tactic of not classifying anyone as 'vaccinated' until 14 days after a dose, then the currently available public data is next to nought. 2) There's a GSK press release (https://www.gsk.com/en-gb/media/press-releases/sk-bioscience-and-gsk-s-adjuvanted-covid-19-vaccine-candidate-meets-coprimary-objectives-in-a-phase-iii-study/). 3) One of the recruiting countries was Ukraine. How can you enrol patients in a trial - and monitor for ICH-GCP standards being upheld - in a war-torn country??? 4) The Nature publication in rhesus macaques (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41541-023-00622-0) includes an author from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. 5) Adjuvants include squalene and polysorbate 80, so plenty of potential to see rates of anaphylaxis similar to those seen with Pfizer/Moderna (1/100,000 injections) or AZ covid vaccines (1.5/100,000 injections). So once again we have products being approved before phase III results are actually published. So no methods critique possible. No full manuscript. No results on clinicaltrials.gov yet: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05007951
One more question for June Raine...Did her various international meetings with, and funded by, Bill Gates, influence her decision making? (See from 14 mins 15 secs in this journalist's presentation of information from early 2022 about the planned transformation of the NHS to NHS-X, a digital service with one quarter of the current staff: https://www.onenewspage.com/video/20220201/14257177/Zed-Phoenix-The-exisitng-NHS-is-being-Destroyed.htm
Do you really need to ask that question when the answer is so obvious? June Raine is as corrupt as you can get. As evil as Josef Mengele, in fact she's worse!!
I keep *trying* to discount the possibility that all this has been intentional -- maybe it was an accidental leak, maybe people/governments did just overreact -- but things like this make that delusion harder and harder to maintain.
No coincidences here. I recommend this post with a dig into all-encompassing digital ID's that include vaccine and medical history rolled out in Africa over last 10 years as testing ground, Participants, planners, are the same culprits, of course.
I should clarify - I was in that predicament for about 6 months in 2021. Not thereafter. I have been unable to watch the BBC for many years as I've only had a TV and license for probably less than a year in the last 30!
No. The only way to end this insanity is to see it is clearly intentional and that they are trying to destroy us. WAKE UP FFS, THIS US WHY THEY'RE STILL GETTING AWAY W THIS!!! GROW A PAIR!
Ms. Raine appears to be another Rochelle Wallensky. We all know what happened to her. Allegedly asked to step down? due to incompetent and dangerous decision making? MHRA, fda, what in god’s name are the people responsible for managing these agencies up to? Absolutely terrifying. Where are our lawmakers? There are a handful in the US fighting these agencies and asking for transparency. Another handful in the UK Parliament. Aaron Siri’s ICAHN and the Highwire have ongoing FOI requests as well as lawsuits against the government for damages done to the public with covid mandates. When will this end? Recently offered a biologic med for rheumatoid arthritis. Went home and did a little online digging. The IV infusion takes six hours. A 100 mg dose of steroid administered before the Biologic infusion. The infusion works by killing b cells, but can also kill RBC’s, platelets, and lymphocytes. At risk for more serious infections. I stopped there. Why do we, the patients have to use our best judgment when offered pharmaceutical treatments. What doctor thinks it is okay to destroy a pts b cells, platelets and rbc’s. What doctor thought it was okay to give a vaxx causing myocarditis, serious adverse events and death? Now June Raine has decided for all of us that this “new” covid vaxx is perfectly fine for people to take despite, once again, having no safety data for pregnant or breast feeding women nor people on immunotherapy. Efficacy? Long term safety? Something is seriously wrong. Best to decline until we know the full story.
The 'efficacy' was determined by inferring it from comparing antibody titres in Astra-Zeneca injected trial participants with those injected with SKYCovion. There was no control group of unvaccinated participants to give an estimate of the absolute effectiveness of the 'vaccine'. It was observed that antibody titres in SKYCovion injected patients were higher after dose 2 than the equivalent in Astra-Zeneca patients. So naturally, SKYC must be more effective than AZ, a 'vaccine' whose efficacy was already robustly determined. Stands to reason don't it! This is the quality of clinical evidence now accepted by the MHRA in order for it to authorise a pharmaceutical product, which effectively means that no pharmaceutical product henceforth authorised for use by the British public can be trusted to be safe and effective. It's time to stop getting 'vaccinated' or medicated with any new drugs licensed for use in the UK.
MHRA's putting through molnupiravir and paxlovid was similarly suspect. The very populations they promoted their use in who might potentially have benefited from them were the very populations hardly studied at all in the trials!
It's a two-part product of PF-07321332 (2x150mg tablets) and ritonavir (1x100mg tablet). The ritonavir is an anti-HIV medicine and is supposed to 'boost' the effect of PF-07321332 by slowing its breakdown. It's given as separate pills. If the ritonavir isn't given correctly Pfizer indicates that the PF-07321332 will not reach sufficient levels in plasma to be effective. The European Medicines Agency hasn't yet authorised it, but has issued advice on it. As with molnupiravir, paxlovid is aimed at unhospitalised patients with at least one underlying condition putting them at risk of severe COVID-19 and is to be used within 5 days of onset of symptoms. As with molnupiravir, the patients enrolled in the trial were unvaccinated only and Pfizer has only reported interim results so far. The absolute risk of hospitalisation within 28 days of starting treatment was 1% (6/607) with paxlovid vs 6.7% (41/612) with placebo. No-one in the paxlovid arm died within 28 days of starting treatment vs. 10 in the placebo arm.
Safety issues with paxlovid
1) Due to interaction potential of PF-07321332 with other drugs that use the CYP3A clearance pathway, and of ritonavir with drugs using other pathways, it cannot be used concomitantly with a long list of drugs. The relevance of this is that either paxlovid could be rendered ineffective if used with these drugs (as it would be broken down more rapidly) or a raised level of the drug in the body could cause a serious or life-threatening reaction. I note that several of the drugs in this list may be those being used in a wide range of patients (e.g. certain strong analgesics, anti-angina medicine, certain anti-cancer agents, certain antibiotics, colchicine, antihistamines, anti-psychotics, ergot derivatives, sedatives/benzodiazepines (e.g. midazolam, triazolam, diazepam), phosphodiesterase inhibitors (including sildenafil and others), St. John's Wort (a herbal people use as anti-depressant), the anti-convulsant carbemazepine, anti-infectives and steroids. This will be particularly relevant in the elderly who will be more likely to be on additional drugs. However, also of note, is that several of these drugs are used in the proper treatment of the second phase of covid (e.g. colchicine, antihistamines and steroids).
2) It cannot be used in pregnant or lactating women as animal data suggest paxlovid affects growth of the foetus.
3) It is also not permitted to be used in people with severely reduced kidney or liver function (particularly relevant in the elderly but also for people with several chronic conditions). In people with moderately reduced kidney function, Pfizer indicates the dose has to be reduced to PF-07321332 (1x150mg tablets) and ritonavir (1x100mg tablet), but they indicate that this dose has not been tested clinically(!)
4) It cannot be used in people with problems with lactose: galactose intolerance, total lactase deficiency or glucose-galactose malabsorption
5) It cannot be used with sildenafil when used for pulmonary arterial hypertension.
6) Caution has to be taken in patients with liver diseases. Serious hepatotoxicity has been observed with ritonavir (hepatitis, jaundice).
7) There is a risk of HIV-1 resistance developing to HIV protease inhibitors in people with uncontrolled or undiagnosed HIV-1.
So, as for molnupiravir, paxlovid needs to be started very soon after symptoms start in order to be effective. It will therefore have similar practical issues unless GPs start answering their phones and seeing patients quickly. It will have further practical issues relating to drug-interactions in many patients, meaning that either paxlovid would be contra-indicated or the other drug would have to be halted while paxlovid was given. This may or may not be something that the treating physician would consider desirable.
Looking at the data for ritonavir, used to boost other agents, it has been associated with:
1) Preterm birth
2) In the elderly, where polypharmacy and comorbidities are common, in an HIV population being treated with ritonavir or other antiretroviral, a quarter (approx. 25%) of the >65 yr olds had drug-drug interactions. So my concern with paxlovid is that the main population who would potentially benefit from it may either be unable to use it or experience drug-drug interactions from it.
Just knowing the names of these poisons let alone all the technical garbage about them is a clear indication that you have too much invested in believing their insanity.
Appalling. It just seems so normal to them to be authorising dangerous products without any kind of scrutiny. In the future, perhaps this will be identified as some kind of group psychosis. Of course, they should be held to account and not let off the hook.
Of note that although the injury reports of thousands of drugs are profiled in their iDAPS, only the COVID vaccines are available in this format hinting that vaccines will be their core business model going forward.
Yes, thank you profoundly: moreover, the tone and manner of presentation of this substack also makes it one which can be recommended to people with confidence - well-reasoned with no ranting or wild theories. The same goes for your videos.
"SK bioscience is expanding its portfolio to secure its competitiveness in the endemic phase of the pandemic by developing 1) universal pan-sarbecovirus vaccines funded by CEPI, 2) polyvalent vaccines, and conducting the pre-clinical trials for 3) mRNA vaccine platform development funded by CEPI and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation."
What is the point of industry-funded ‘regulators’ such as the MHRA, FDA and TGA, which appear to be facilitators for exploiting mass populations with highly questionable products?
Wouldn’t we be much better off without these rogue ‘regulators’, and instead rely on ‘buyer beware’?
We'd be better off if they were all executed. Along w Billy G.
Evidently, there ARE no standards.
Except: “How much profit is this likely to drum up?”
I decided in 2020 that I was never going to take another vaccine again in my life, and try to avoid any NHS treatments if at all possible, trying alternative medicine and remedies.
I have lost all trust and faith in health"care", the government and the International bodies such as the WHO, UN etc etc
I will also refuse a digital ID and CBDCs, no matter what the consequences.
Me too! And there are more like us than we think ...
🙏
Ah, another adjuvant candidate for the covid jabs - Squaline - although I understand it's been used in flu jabs.
Adjuvants are known in immunological circles as an immunologist's dirty little secret.
"The precise mechanism behind adjuvants is not fully understood". In other words they don't have a bloody clue.
They keep trying different ones, aluminium, mercury, formaldehyde, peanut oil that I'm aware of.
So, we have a huge problem with peanut allergy - nothing to do with the jabs of course.
Are we now going to have an epedemic of people allergic to sharks
Some suspect squalene in anthrax shots was responsible for Gulf War Syndrome. There was some evidence of dose tolerance testing in the vaccine contents and people with the syndrome tested positive for squalene antibodies. This was detailed in a book called Vaccine A.
Detergent is another adjuvant that has been added to the mix in another covid "vaccine". How many more bizarre substances can they get people to accept being injected into their bodies!!
Good point. I fully agree, exposure to sharks after vaccination should be avoided. It would most definitely be detrimental to your health.
😂😂😂
More points to note about Skycovione: 1) the phase III data is only published as an abstract currently (just days ago https://www.ijidonline.com/article/S1201-9712(23)00473-3/pdf). Two doses, 4 weeks apart, data presented to timepoint 2 weeks after second dose only. And if they are censoring the outcomes using the CDC-recommended tactic of not classifying anyone as 'vaccinated' until 14 days after a dose, then the currently available public data is next to nought. 2) There's a GSK press release (https://www.gsk.com/en-gb/media/press-releases/sk-bioscience-and-gsk-s-adjuvanted-covid-19-vaccine-candidate-meets-coprimary-objectives-in-a-phase-iii-study/). 3) One of the recruiting countries was Ukraine. How can you enrol patients in a trial - and monitor for ICH-GCP standards being upheld - in a war-torn country??? 4) The Nature publication in rhesus macaques (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41541-023-00622-0) includes an author from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. 5) Adjuvants include squalene and polysorbate 80, so plenty of potential to see rates of anaphylaxis similar to those seen with Pfizer/Moderna (1/100,000 injections) or AZ covid vaccines (1.5/100,000 injections). So once again we have products being approved before phase III results are actually published. So no methods critique possible. No full manuscript. No results on clinicaltrials.gov yet: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05007951
Let's mandate that all clinical trials be done on the dirtbags that invent this garbage before ever given to anyone else.
One more question for June Raine...Did her various international meetings with, and funded by, Bill Gates, influence her decision making? (See from 14 mins 15 secs in this journalist's presentation of information from early 2022 about the planned transformation of the NHS to NHS-X, a digital service with one quarter of the current staff: https://www.onenewspage.com/video/20220201/14257177/Zed-Phoenix-The-exisitng-NHS-is-being-Destroyed.htm
Do you really need to ask that question when the answer is so obvious? June Raine is as corrupt as you can get. As evil as Josef Mengele, in fact she's worse!!
We are completely in agreement
I keep *trying* to discount the possibility that all this has been intentional -- maybe it was an accidental leak, maybe people/governments did just overreact -- but things like this make that delusion harder and harder to maintain.
For 2021 I was in that predicament. Firmly in the intentional camp now.
No coincidences here. I recommend this post with a dig into all-encompassing digital ID's that include vaccine and medical history rolled out in Africa over last 10 years as testing ground, Participants, planners, are the same culprits, of course.
https://liamsturgess.substack.com/
https://rumble.com/v2t5sfm-how-mastercard-saved-africa-microjourneys.html
What took you so long? Probably too much watching of the BBC and their medical and science editors with IPSWICH of rocking horses!!
I should clarify - I was in that predicament for about 6 months in 2021. Not thereafter. I have been unable to watch the BBC for many years as I've only had a TV and license for probably less than a year in the last 30!
No. The only way to end this insanity is to see it is clearly intentional and that they are trying to destroy us. WAKE UP FFS, THIS US WHY THEY'RE STILL GETTING AWAY W THIS!!! GROW A PAIR!
Ms. Raine appears to be another Rochelle Wallensky. We all know what happened to her. Allegedly asked to step down? due to incompetent and dangerous decision making? MHRA, fda, what in god’s name are the people responsible for managing these agencies up to? Absolutely terrifying. Where are our lawmakers? There are a handful in the US fighting these agencies and asking for transparency. Another handful in the UK Parliament. Aaron Siri’s ICAHN and the Highwire have ongoing FOI requests as well as lawsuits against the government for damages done to the public with covid mandates. When will this end? Recently offered a biologic med for rheumatoid arthritis. Went home and did a little online digging. The IV infusion takes six hours. A 100 mg dose of steroid administered before the Biologic infusion. The infusion works by killing b cells, but can also kill RBC’s, platelets, and lymphocytes. At risk for more serious infections. I stopped there. Why do we, the patients have to use our best judgment when offered pharmaceutical treatments. What doctor thinks it is okay to destroy a pts b cells, platelets and rbc’s. What doctor thought it was okay to give a vaxx causing myocarditis, serious adverse events and death? Now June Raine has decided for all of us that this “new” covid vaxx is perfectly fine for people to take despite, once again, having no safety data for pregnant or breast feeding women nor people on immunotherapy. Efficacy? Long term safety? Something is seriously wrong. Best to decline until we know the full story.
I think y'all need a good dose of testosterone.
The 'efficacy' was determined by inferring it from comparing antibody titres in Astra-Zeneca injected trial participants with those injected with SKYCovion. There was no control group of unvaccinated participants to give an estimate of the absolute effectiveness of the 'vaccine'. It was observed that antibody titres in SKYCovion injected patients were higher after dose 2 than the equivalent in Astra-Zeneca patients. So naturally, SKYC must be more effective than AZ, a 'vaccine' whose efficacy was already robustly determined. Stands to reason don't it! This is the quality of clinical evidence now accepted by the MHRA in order for it to authorise a pharmaceutical product, which effectively means that no pharmaceutical product henceforth authorised for use by the British public can be trusted to be safe and effective. It's time to stop getting 'vaccinated' or medicated with any new drugs licensed for use in the UK.
So, 'AZ was good, therefore SKYcovion must be double good' would sum it up?
Once one starts to reason from false premises any fantasy can be constructed.
And no control group at all? God help us!
MHRA's putting through molnupiravir and paxlovid was similarly suspect. The very populations they promoted their use in who might potentially have benefited from them were the very populations hardly studied at all in the trials!
For example, for paxlovid...
It's a two-part product of PF-07321332 (2x150mg tablets) and ritonavir (1x100mg tablet). The ritonavir is an anti-HIV medicine and is supposed to 'boost' the effect of PF-07321332 by slowing its breakdown. It's given as separate pills. If the ritonavir isn't given correctly Pfizer indicates that the PF-07321332 will not reach sufficient levels in plasma to be effective. The European Medicines Agency hasn't yet authorised it, but has issued advice on it. As with molnupiravir, paxlovid is aimed at unhospitalised patients with at least one underlying condition putting them at risk of severe COVID-19 and is to be used within 5 days of onset of symptoms. As with molnupiravir, the patients enrolled in the trial were unvaccinated only and Pfizer has only reported interim results so far. The absolute risk of hospitalisation within 28 days of starting treatment was 1% (6/607) with paxlovid vs 6.7% (41/612) with placebo. No-one in the paxlovid arm died within 28 days of starting treatment vs. 10 in the placebo arm.
Safety issues with paxlovid
1) Due to interaction potential of PF-07321332 with other drugs that use the CYP3A clearance pathway, and of ritonavir with drugs using other pathways, it cannot be used concomitantly with a long list of drugs. The relevance of this is that either paxlovid could be rendered ineffective if used with these drugs (as it would be broken down more rapidly) or a raised level of the drug in the body could cause a serious or life-threatening reaction. I note that several of the drugs in this list may be those being used in a wide range of patients (e.g. certain strong analgesics, anti-angina medicine, certain anti-cancer agents, certain antibiotics, colchicine, antihistamines, anti-psychotics, ergot derivatives, sedatives/benzodiazepines (e.g. midazolam, triazolam, diazepam), phosphodiesterase inhibitors (including sildenafil and others), St. John's Wort (a herbal people use as anti-depressant), the anti-convulsant carbemazepine, anti-infectives and steroids. This will be particularly relevant in the elderly who will be more likely to be on additional drugs. However, also of note, is that several of these drugs are used in the proper treatment of the second phase of covid (e.g. colchicine, antihistamines and steroids).
2) It cannot be used in pregnant or lactating women as animal data suggest paxlovid affects growth of the foetus.
3) It is also not permitted to be used in people with severely reduced kidney or liver function (particularly relevant in the elderly but also for people with several chronic conditions). In people with moderately reduced kidney function, Pfizer indicates the dose has to be reduced to PF-07321332 (1x150mg tablets) and ritonavir (1x100mg tablet), but they indicate that this dose has not been tested clinically(!)
4) It cannot be used in people with problems with lactose: galactose intolerance, total lactase deficiency or glucose-galactose malabsorption
5) It cannot be used with sildenafil when used for pulmonary arterial hypertension.
6) Caution has to be taken in patients with liver diseases. Serious hepatotoxicity has been observed with ritonavir (hepatitis, jaundice).
7) There is a risk of HIV-1 resistance developing to HIV protease inhibitors in people with uncontrolled or undiagnosed HIV-1.
So, as for molnupiravir, paxlovid needs to be started very soon after symptoms start in order to be effective. It will therefore have similar practical issues unless GPs start answering their phones and seeing patients quickly. It will have further practical issues relating to drug-interactions in many patients, meaning that either paxlovid would be contra-indicated or the other drug would have to be halted while paxlovid was given. This may or may not be something that the treating physician would consider desirable.
Looking at the data for ritonavir, used to boost other agents, it has been associated with:
1) Preterm birth
2) In the elderly, where polypharmacy and comorbidities are common, in an HIV population being treated with ritonavir or other antiretroviral, a quarter (approx. 25%) of the >65 yr olds had drug-drug interactions. So my concern with paxlovid is that the main population who would potentially benefit from it may either be unable to use it or experience drug-drug interactions from it.
Just knowing the names of these poisons let alone all the technical garbage about them is a clear indication that you have too much invested in believing their insanity.
Unhelpful comment: the information is highly useful. We won't get anywhere just ranting and raving.....
Useful for what? So you know which poison to take? Keep giving the murderers platforms, that's real smart.
Their just trying to rewrite history and do away with any prior "standards" they may have had in the past. Neferious malfeceant iatrogenicide imo.
Correct
Iatrogenocide, good one, perfect description.
Nope, not taking it, not even at 15 or 20 years unless you can (by then) show me some real safety data!
Not even then.
Probably a wise decision.
Appalling. It just seems so normal to them to be authorising dangerous products without any kind of scrutiny. In the future, perhaps this will be identified as some kind of group psychosis. Of course, they should be held to account and not let off the hook.
Of note that although the injury reports of thousands of drugs are profiled in their iDAPS, only the COVID vaccines are available in this format hinting that vaccines will be their core business model going forward.
Yes, appalling. More appalling is that anyone would give it a shred of credence.
As long as she does her old lady routine people will roll up their arms. Shame.
No words. Except: thank you for reporting this.
Yes, thank you profoundly: moreover, the tone and manner of presentation of this substack also makes it one which can be recommended to people with confidence - well-reasoned with no ranting or wild theories. The same goes for your videos.
SmPC here https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1159556/Skycovion_spc-doc.pdf
Approved by MHRA May 26th 2023.
SK Chemicals GmbH is the marketing authorisation holder. https://www.biospace.com/article/releases/sk-bioscience-receives-marketing-authorization-of-covid-19-vaccine-from-uk-mhra/
"SK bioscience is expanding its portfolio to secure its competitiveness in the endemic phase of the pandemic by developing 1) universal pan-sarbecovirus vaccines funded by CEPI, 2) polyvalent vaccines, and conducting the pre-clinical trials for 3) mRNA vaccine platform development funded by CEPI and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation."
Nuremberg 2.0
I guess crooks carry on committing crimes until brought to book .
Truly appalling.
Exactly