This is quite an alarming developing story that not enough people are paying attention to. With thanks to Debi Evans for this information. In the segment starting at 47 mins on UK Column News (31 May 2023) Debi Evans discusses the new SKYCovion covid
What is the point of industry-funded ‘regulators’ such as the MHRA, FDA and TGA, which appear to be facilitators for exploiting mass populations with highly questionable products?
Wouldn’t we be much better off without these rogue ‘regulators’, and instead rely on ‘buyer beware’?
Evidently, there ARE no standards.
I decided in 2020 that I was never going to take another vaccine again in my life, and try to avoid any NHS treatments if at all possible, trying alternative medicine and remedies.
I have lost all trust and faith in health"care", the government and the International bodies such as the WHO, UN etc etc
I will also refuse a digital ID and CBDCs, no matter what the consequences.
Ah, another adjuvant candidate for the covid jabs - Squaline - although I understand it's been used in flu jabs.
Adjuvants are known in immunological circles as an immunologist's dirty little secret.
"The precise mechanism behind adjuvants is not fully understood". In other words they don't have a bloody clue.
They keep trying different ones, aluminium, mercury, formaldehyde, peanut oil that I'm aware of.
So, we have a huge problem with peanut allergy - nothing to do with the jabs of course.
Are we now going to have an epedemic of people allergic to sharks
More points to note about Skycovione: 1) the phase III data is only published as an abstract currently (just days ago https://www.ijidonline.com/article/S1201-9712(23)00473-3/pdf). Two doses, 4 weeks apart, data presented to timepoint 2 weeks after second dose only. And if they are censoring the outcomes using the CDC-recommended tactic of not classifying anyone as 'vaccinated' until 14 days after a dose, then the currently available public data is next to nought. 2) There's a GSK press release (https://www.gsk.com/en-gb/media/press-releases/sk-bioscience-and-gsk-s-adjuvanted-covid-19-vaccine-candidate-meets-coprimary-objectives-in-a-phase-iii-study/). 3) One of the recruiting countries was Ukraine. How can you enrol patients in a trial - and monitor for ICH-GCP standards being upheld - in a war-torn country??? 4) The Nature publication in rhesus macaques (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41541-023-00622-0) includes an author from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. 5) Adjuvants include squalene and polysorbate 80, so plenty of potential to see rates of anaphylaxis similar to those seen with Pfizer/Moderna (1/100,000 injections) or AZ covid vaccines (1.5/100,000 injections). So once again we have products being approved before phase III results are actually published. So no methods critique possible. No full manuscript. No results on clinicaltrials.gov yet: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05007951
One more question for June Raine...Did her various international meetings with, and funded by, Bill Gates, influence her decision making? (See from 14 mins 15 secs in this journalist's presentation of information from early 2022 about the planned transformation of the NHS to NHS-X, a digital service with one quarter of the current staff: https://www.onenewspage.com/video/20220201/14257177/Zed-Phoenix-The-exisitng-NHS-is-being-Destroyed.htm
I keep *trying* to discount the possibility that all this has been intentional -- maybe it was an accidental leak, maybe people/governments did just overreact -- but things like this make that delusion harder and harder to maintain.
Ms. Raine appears to be another Rochelle Wallensky. We all know what happened to her. Allegedly asked to step down? due to incompetent and dangerous decision making? MHRA, fda, what in god’s name are the people responsible for managing these agencies up to? Absolutely terrifying. Where are our lawmakers? There are a handful in the US fighting these agencies and asking for transparency. Another handful in the UK Parliament. Aaron Siri’s ICAHN and the Highwire have ongoing FOI requests as well as lawsuits against the government for damages done to the public with covid mandates. When will this end? Recently offered a biologic med for rheumatoid arthritis. Went home and did a little online digging. The IV infusion takes six hours. A 100 mg dose of steroid administered before the Biologic infusion. The infusion works by killing b cells, but can also kill RBC’s, platelets, and lymphocytes. At risk for more serious infections. I stopped there. Why do we, the patients have to use our best judgment when offered pharmaceutical treatments. What doctor thinks it is okay to destroy a pts b cells, platelets and rbc’s. What doctor thought it was okay to give a vaxx causing myocarditis, serious adverse events and death? Now June Raine has decided for all of us that this “new” covid vaxx is perfectly fine for people to take despite, once again, having no safety data for pregnant or breast feeding women nor people on immunotherapy. Efficacy? Long term safety? Something is seriously wrong. Best to decline until we know the full story.
The 'efficacy' was determined by inferring it from comparing antibody titres in Astra-Zeneca injected trial participants with those injected with SKYCovion. There was no control group of unvaccinated participants to give an estimate of the absolute effectiveness of the 'vaccine'. It was observed that antibody titres in SKYCovion injected patients were higher after dose 2 than the equivalent in Astra-Zeneca patients. So naturally, SKYC must be more effective than AZ, a 'vaccine' whose efficacy was already robustly determined. Stands to reason don't it! This is the quality of clinical evidence now accepted by the MHRA in order for it to authorise a pharmaceutical product, which effectively means that no pharmaceutical product henceforth authorised for use by the British public can be trusted to be safe and effective. It's time to stop getting 'vaccinated' or medicated with any new drugs licensed for use in the UK.
On the last American vagabond show, Ryan noticed that the shot had the same adverse effects as the control group.... Both around 14% adverse effects, hmm.
Hmm what is the placebo used?!?
In another document they were comparing the control and the shot and mentioned the technical name of the astra zeneca vaccine....
Yeah, the control in past trials were other vaccines, like meningitis shot.
In this case it looks to be the astra zeneca clot shot!
THAT'S NOT FKIN SCIENTIFIC!
MHRA's putting through molnupiravir and paxlovid was similarly suspect. The very populations they promoted their use in who might potentially have benefited from them were the very populations hardly studied at all in the trials!
Their just trying to rewrite history and do away with any prior "standards" they may have had in the past. Neferious malfeceant iatrogenicide imo.
Nope, not taking it, not even at 15 or 20 years unless you can (by then) show me some real safety data!
Appalling. It just seems so normal to them to be authorising dangerous products without any kind of scrutiny. In the future, perhaps this will be identified as some kind of group psychosis. Of course, they should be held to account and not let off the hook.
Of note that although the injury reports of thousands of drugs are profiled in their iDAPS, only the COVID vaccines are available in this format hinting that vaccines will be their core business model going forward.
No words. Except: thank you for reporting this.
SmPC here https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1159556/Skycovion_spc-doc.pdf
Approved by MHRA May 26th 2023.
SK Chemicals GmbH is the marketing authorisation holder. https://www.biospace.com/article/releases/sk-bioscience-receives-marketing-authorization-of-covid-19-vaccine-from-uk-mhra/
"SK bioscience is expanding its portfolio to secure its competitiveness in the endemic phase of the pandemic by developing 1) universal pan-sarbecovirus vaccines funded by CEPI, 2) polyvalent vaccines, and conducting the pre-clinical trials for 3) mRNA vaccine platform development funded by CEPI and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation."