Prof. Fenton, if you could go back two decades, knowing then what you know now, what would you say to yourself and is there anything you would do differently?
Perhaps looking back through the retroscope is pointless, but perhaps not if there's still a chance to guide others who have decades to go in their careers and looking to make a difference.
Good stuff! You will soon need someone to follow you (and the other Martin fellow to follow you around chanting " Remember thou art mortal" haha! Loved the high colour charts in the first link!
Keep on articulating what we are all thinking in the credible way that you do. I think the biggest barrier is the bridge that the vast majority of social and alt-media plus politicians and the MSM have to cross to understand the value and messages of basic arithmetic, let alone maths, advanced maths and risk metrics
Well done for making the facts and the message more important than the "narrative"!
One minor point - aren't pigs and chickens, as well as beef and sheep, also threatened with extinction by the anti-human movement
thank you for sharing with the public your views on the health and climate crises we as humans may be facing and how we may be getting some of the facts wrong. Even beyond troubling viruses and carbon dioxide- the weakening of Earth's magnetic field, the increased cosmic rays consequently hitting our atmosphere at lower altitudes and causing higher precipitation at lower latitudes, strongly varying solar activity, etc., may be some precursors of even more dramatic events (it wouldn't be the first time in Earth's history). How to make humanity more resilient to the many potential crises to come, must weigh heavy on the policy makers' minds. How much transparency and how much obfuscation do we need to effectively implement possibly important (yet uncomfortable) societal changes? More importantly, are our current world view and our way of thinking (that have lead to a certain existential crisis even in fundamental physics) at all adequate to properly address these issues or are our attempts causing more harm than good? Late quantum physicist David Bohm may have given one of the best assessments in his books on the effects of and how to overcome our fragmented view that tries to divide and conquer and how to move toward a more (w)holistic way of living and understanding of our universe. Furthermore, it may be valid, in my eyes, just to simply ask the question: can the energy, coming from the sun, differentiating into each and every of us human beings and going through pretty much everything around us, organise differently than it currently does? Such a question, if asked sufficiently earnestly and left open for the most part, as the output would be ever changing, may, in turn, open the mind to provide for the empty canvass of possibilities on which a wholesome, higher organised system may appear of its own accord- an order, in which policy decisions may become close to irrelevant, and the beauty of complex life can naturally spread to the other planets and beyond. What would the statistical probability be?
Dear Norman, Thank you for your outstanding campaigning efforts against ongoing Covid and climate change skulduggery. I’m especially pleased that you are “tackling climate change”, to coin a phrase, as not many other professionals have taken this on. I have been campaigning against alleged man-made global warming for decades, long before Covid came along, obviously with zero success and for my efforts being labelled as an obsessive crank.
The globalists and their puppet politicians showed their true colours through their evil Covid “plandemic” and it is now as clear as day that they have been lying to us about almost everything, probably since the beginning of time. As you did in your Better Way presentation, I have pointed out the obvious parallels between the Covid narrative and the climate change narrative.
For personal reasons I recently withdrew from active campaigning although I have reserved the right to stage a comeback! You may be interested in my “final” post which I sub-titled “My Campaigning Swan Song”, kindly hosted by my colleague Joel Smalley: https://metatron.substack.com/p/covid-climate-change-agenda-2030.
I have admired your work on Covid, but I am flabbergasted and dismayed to see that your appropriate distrust of big Pharma is more than equaled by your love affair with big oil by promoting their propaganda and narrative that climate change is not real.
You presented absolutely zero evidence in your talk to indicate that the climate crisis is not existentially serious. For someone supposedly devoted to rigorous evidence. your talk was an utter embarrassment.
The CIA pharma military industrial complex are experimenting with self-assembling nanoparticles. Are they causing the massive bloodclots we have been seeing worldwide?
As I said elsewhere, Norman-you are a man of courage and integrity, your data keeps us out here in the game!
Here is what you missed on Sunday. Wonderful speakers. I am very sorry that I missed greeting you then, (did I send you this?) https://hughmccarthy.substack.com/p/our-day-at-the-better-way-conference
Brilliant work as per usual, you must be busier now you have "retired" than ever before?
Thank you, thank you, thank you from a dispirited and very disgusted heretic. May the force be with you, Professor Fenton.
Prof. Fenton, if you could go back two decades, knowing then what you know now, what would you say to yourself and is there anything you would do differently?
Perhaps looking back through the retroscope is pointless, but perhaps not if there's still a chance to guide others who have decades to go in their careers and looking to make a difference.
.
I've Come To The Conclusion
Ex Post Facto
That The Vaccinated People
Are Exactly The People
That I Would Have Wanted To Take It.
.
Good stuff! You will soon need someone to follow you (and the other Martin fellow to follow you around chanting " Remember thou art mortal" haha! Loved the high colour charts in the first link!
Keep on articulating what we are all thinking in the credible way that you do. I think the biggest barrier is the bridge that the vast majority of social and alt-media plus politicians and the MSM have to cross to understand the value and messages of basic arithmetic, let alone maths, advanced maths and risk metrics
Well done for making the facts and the message more important than the "narrative"!
One minor point - aren't pigs and chickens, as well as beef and sheep, also threatened with extinction by the anti-human movement
Wonderful to see this, thank you.
Thank you Professor Norman Fenton.
UK COLUMN PATRICK MOORE
“WE ARE IN AN ICE AGE”
Sensible Environmentalism—Patrick Moore
https://www.ukcolumn.org/video/sensible-environmentalism-patrick-moore
.
The Vaccinated Are To Be Judged By The Sickness
Of Their Behavior In Society Among Us.
Their Physical Suffering Is Not The Issue.
Their Own Government
Used Their Own Minds Against Them.
If You're Not On That
Your Own Government
Will Use Them Against You.
.
Dear Professor Fenton,
thank you for sharing with the public your views on the health and climate crises we as humans may be facing and how we may be getting some of the facts wrong. Even beyond troubling viruses and carbon dioxide- the weakening of Earth's magnetic field, the increased cosmic rays consequently hitting our atmosphere at lower altitudes and causing higher precipitation at lower latitudes, strongly varying solar activity, etc., may be some precursors of even more dramatic events (it wouldn't be the first time in Earth's history). How to make humanity more resilient to the many potential crises to come, must weigh heavy on the policy makers' minds. How much transparency and how much obfuscation do we need to effectively implement possibly important (yet uncomfortable) societal changes? More importantly, are our current world view and our way of thinking (that have lead to a certain existential crisis even in fundamental physics) at all adequate to properly address these issues or are our attempts causing more harm than good? Late quantum physicist David Bohm may have given one of the best assessments in his books on the effects of and how to overcome our fragmented view that tries to divide and conquer and how to move toward a more (w)holistic way of living and understanding of our universe. Furthermore, it may be valid, in my eyes, just to simply ask the question: can the energy, coming from the sun, differentiating into each and every of us human beings and going through pretty much everything around us, organise differently than it currently does? Such a question, if asked sufficiently earnestly and left open for the most part, as the output would be ever changing, may, in turn, open the mind to provide for the empty canvass of possibilities on which a wholesome, higher organised system may appear of its own accord- an order, in which policy decisions may become close to irrelevant, and the beauty of complex life can naturally spread to the other planets and beyond. What would the statistical probability be?
Arise SIR Norman Fenton! Leading truth warrior! Now Media Star!
OK, we have now determined that Professor Fenton is very popular with the ladies...! :)
https://rumble.com/v2utwg6-the-plan.html?mref=6zof&mrefc=5
Dear Norman, Thank you for your outstanding campaigning efforts against ongoing Covid and climate change skulduggery. I’m especially pleased that you are “tackling climate change”, to coin a phrase, as not many other professionals have taken this on. I have been campaigning against alleged man-made global warming for decades, long before Covid came along, obviously with zero success and for my efforts being labelled as an obsessive crank.
The globalists and their puppet politicians showed their true colours through their evil Covid “plandemic” and it is now as clear as day that they have been lying to us about almost everything, probably since the beginning of time. As you did in your Better Way presentation, I have pointed out the obvious parallels between the Covid narrative and the climate change narrative.
For personal reasons I recently withdrew from active campaigning although I have reserved the right to stage a comeback! You may be interested in my “final” post which I sub-titled “My Campaigning Swan Song”, kindly hosted by my colleague Joel Smalley: https://metatron.substack.com/p/covid-climate-change-agenda-2030.
I have admired your work on Covid, but I am flabbergasted and dismayed to see that your appropriate distrust of big Pharma is more than equaled by your love affair with big oil by promoting their propaganda and narrative that climate change is not real.
You presented absolutely zero evidence in your talk to indicate that the climate crisis is not existentially serious. For someone supposedly devoted to rigorous evidence. your talk was an utter embarrassment.
The CIA pharma military industrial complex are experimenting with self-assembling nanoparticles. Are they causing the massive bloodclots we have been seeing worldwide?
More here; https://wakeuppeople.substack.com/p/self-assembling-nanoparticles-causing